Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Efficacy of Individualized Dietary Advice in Improving Diet Quality and Cardiovascular Health (NCT NCT03854461)

NCT ID: NCT03854461

Last Updated: 2025-08-17

Results Overview

Dietary quality will be assessed using an online version of the Prime Diet Quality Score (PDQS). Foods are classified as healthy and unhealthy. Points are assigned according to the following criteria: 0-1 serving/wk (0 point) compared with 2-3 servings/wk (1 point) compared with ≥4 servings/wk (2 points) for the healthy food groups. Scoring is reversed and points deducted for the unhealthy food groups. Points for each food group are summed to give an overall score. The PDQS has 21 food groups and ranges from 0 to 42 total score (scores on a scale), with a higher score indicating a better diet quality.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

162 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline and six months

Results posted on

2025-08-17

Participant Flow

Recruitment took place between December 2021 and November 2022 at both Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland and University College Dublin, Republic of Ireland sites.

As n=12 participants who were enrolled onto the study were not contactable afterwards to arrange baseline (Month 0) study visits, n=162 participants in total were enrolled to account for losses identified early in data collection process before baseline visit. N=150 completed baseline (Month 0) visits but n=1 participant was discovered to be ineligible at baseline visit and was removed. Therefore n=149 completed baseline visits and were randomised.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Educational Material
Participants will be given written educational material to encourage dietary change towards a better quality diet. Educational material will be adapted from resources used in previous dietary intervention studies.
Personalised Dietary Advice and Educational Material
Participants will also be given the educational material, but will be encouraged to make dietary change using individualized recommendations incorporating food markers of specific components of a high quality diet. Food markers of diet quality will be used to develop an algorithm to deliver personalized dietary advice. Based on biomarker data, a system of categorization of biomarker status will be developed, alongside dietary advice related to this biomarker categorization, and decision trees created, as previously described in the Food4Me study, to ensure standardized delivery of advice within this intervention arm.
Overall Study
STARTED
74
75
Overall Study
COMPLETED
63
56
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
11
19

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Educational Material
n=74 Participants
Participants will be given written educational material to encourage dietary change towards a better quality diet. Educational material will be adapted from resources used in previous dietary intervention studies.
Personalised Dietary Advice and Educational Material
n=75 Participants
Participants will also be given the educational material, but will be encouraged to make dietary change using individualized recommendations incorporating food markers of specific components of a high quality diet. Food markers of diet quality will be used to develop an algorithm to deliver personalized dietary advice. Based on biomarker data, a system of categorization of biomarker status will be developed, alongside dietary advice related to this biomarker categorization, and decision trees created, as previously described in the Food4Me study, to ensure standardized delivery of advice within this intervention arm.
Total
n=149 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
48.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 • n=74 Participants
50.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=75 Participants
49.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=149 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
51 Participants
n=74 Participants
55 Participants
n=75 Participants
106 Participants
n=149 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants
n=74 Participants
20 Participants
n=75 Participants
43 Participants
n=149 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Prime Diet Quality Score
14.9 PDQS score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9 • n=74 Participants
16.1 PDQS score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 • n=75 Participants
15.5 PDQS score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 • n=149 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and six months

Population: Primary outcome was assessed via questionnaire. At Month 6 some participants completed questionnaire only (including primary outcome) but not visits (secondary outcomes; whilst some participants completed visits only (secondary outcomes) but not questionnaires (primary outcome).

Dietary quality will be assessed using an online version of the Prime Diet Quality Score (PDQS). Foods are classified as healthy and unhealthy. Points are assigned according to the following criteria: 0-1 serving/wk (0 point) compared with 2-3 servings/wk (1 point) compared with ≥4 servings/wk (2 points) for the healthy food groups. Scoring is reversed and points deducted for the unhealthy food groups. Points for each food group are summed to give an overall score. The PDQS has 21 food groups and ranges from 0 to 42 total score (scores on a scale), with a higher score indicating a better diet quality.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Difference in Mean Change Between Groups (Xtreg) (95% CI)
n=119 Participants
Dietary intake was assessed using an online version of the Prime Diet Quality Score (PDQS). Foods were classified as healthy and unhealthy. Points were assigned according to the following criteria: 0-1 serving/wk (0 point) compared with 2-3 servings/wk (1 point) compared with ≥4 servings/wk (2 points) for the healthy food groups. Scoring will be reversed and points deducted for the unhealthy food groups. Points for each food group will be then summed to give an overall score. The PDQS has 21 food groups and ranges from 0 to 42 total points. Difference in mean change in PDQS between education and comparator groups between Months 0 and 6 was the primary outcome.
Difference in Mean Change in Prime Diet Quality Score Between Groups Between Months 0 and 6
1.22 Units on a scale
Interval -0.51 to 2.95

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and six months

Questionnaire to assess number of units consumed weekly

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and six months

Questionnaire to assess usual medication use (drug name, dose and frequency of use)

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and six months

Physical activity using an accelerometer; data to be used will be total step count

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and six months

Weight will be measured in kg using calibrated scales.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and six months

Waist and hip circumference will be measured in cm according to standardised operating procedures using a tape measure.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and six months

Height will be measured in metres using a stadiometer.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and six months

Body composition (% body fat) will be measured using bioelectrical impedence (Bodystat 1500).

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and six months

Blood pressure will be measured twice from the right arm, using an automated Omron sphygmomanometer, with the participant sitting quietly for at least five minutes.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and six months

Serum lipids (total cholesterol, HDL-C, and TG) and whole blood HbA1c will be assessed by enzymatic assays (Randox Ltd, Crumlin, NI and Glen Bio, Antrim, NI) on an I-Lab 600 auto-analyzer. LDL-C will be calculated.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and six months

The following biomarkers will be used to assess nutritional status response to the dietary intervention: red meat - methylhistidines and carnosine; white meat - TMAO, guanidoacetate, anserine; fruit and vegetables -- proline betaine, isothiocyanates, S-methyl-L-cysteine sulfoxide, and tartaric acid; wholegrains - alkylresorcinols; coffee - phenolic acids, N-methylpyridinium, trigonelline, 2-furoylglycine; SSBs -- formate, citrulline, taurine, and isocitrate) red meat- methylhistidines; oily fish- omega-3 index; fruit and vegetables- total carotenoids and proline betaine; wholegrain- alkylresorcinols.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and six months

Sample handling and nucleic acid purifications will be performed following an established protocol. Illumina DNA-seq libraries with fragment length of \~300 bp will be generated as previously described, with Pippen prep size selection. For RNA-seq, 5ug of RNA will be enriched for mRNA and subjected to strand-specific cDNA synthesis using established protocols. Paired-end sequencing (e.g. 150x150 nt) will be performed on the Illumina HiSeq platform.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

Personalised Dietary Advice and Educational Material

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Educational Material

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Prof. Jayne Woodside

Queen's University Belfast

Phone: +44 (0)28 9097 8942

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place