Trial Outcomes & Findings for Post Stroke Walking Kinematics Using the Honda Walking Assist Robotic Exoskeleton (NCT NCT03828214)

NCT ID: NCT03828214

Last Updated: 2023-03-07

Results Overview

Difference in affected leg maximum knee flexion angle (initial swing to midswing) between conditions Kinematic Analysis of Gait will be obtained using a Qualisys 8-camera motion capture system. Sample rate 120 Hz. A modified Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli (IOR) gait marker set (\~40 markers) applied bilaterally.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

11 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Gait kinematics were measured in each of 4 conditions during one 2-hour session for each participant.

Results posted on

2023-03-07

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Walking
In this study a single group of participants were observed in each of 4 conditions: control walking (CI), HWA walking (C2), Aftereffect (C3), and Late aftereffect (C4)
Overall Study
STARTED
11
Overall Study
COMPLETED
11
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Walking
n=11 Participants
In this study a single group of participants were studied during one session in each of 4 conditions: control walking (CI), HWA walking (C2), Aftereffect (C3), and Late aftereffect (C4)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=11 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants
n=11 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants
n=11 Participants
Age, Continuous
67.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 • n=11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
n=11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants
n=11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
11 Participants
n=11 Participants
Height
163 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=11 Participants
weight
81 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.2 • n=11 Participants
Stroke affected side was left
9 Participants
n=11 Participants
Time post stroke
7.3 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4 • n=11 Participants
Fugl-meyer Assessment
30.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 • n=11 Participants
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
22.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 • n=11 Participants
Activities Specific Balance Confidence Scale
72.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.2 • n=11 Participants
Steps per day
2783 steps
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1512 • n=11 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Gait kinematics were measured in each of 4 conditions during one 2-hour session for each participant.

Population: For one participant data was not available for the C3 condition

Difference in affected leg maximum knee flexion angle (initial swing to midswing) between conditions Kinematic Analysis of Gait will be obtained using a Qualisys 8-camera motion capture system. Sample rate 120 Hz. A modified Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli (IOR) gait marker set (\~40 markers) applied bilaterally.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Walking
n=10 Participants
In this study a single group of participants were studied during one session in each of 4 conditions: control walking (CI), HWA walking (C2), Aftereffect (C3), and Late aftereffect (C4)
Gait Kinematics
C1
55.9 degrees
Standard Deviation 12.3
Gait Kinematics
C2
57.8 degrees
Standard Deviation 12.4
Gait Kinematics
C3
58.3 degrees
Standard Deviation 8.1
Gait Kinematics
C4
56.6 degrees
Standard Deviation 12.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Measured during swing phase of gait during each of 4 walking conditions during a single data collection session.

Population: There was a single group that participated in this within subject design study, here we compare the outcome parameter across the four conditions for this group.

Average max EMG of affected tibialis anterior muscle measured during swing phase for walking conditions using Delsys Tringo EMG sensors. Sample rate 2000Hz.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Walking
n=10 Participants
In this study a single group of participants were studied during one session in each of 4 conditions: control walking (CI), HWA walking (C2), Aftereffect (C3), and Late aftereffect (C4)
Lower Limb Electromyography (EMG)
C3
0.101 mV
Standard Deviation 0.064
Lower Limb Electromyography (EMG)
C1
0.115 mV
Standard Deviation 0.080
Lower Limb Electromyography (EMG)
C2
0.115 mV
Standard Deviation 0.077
Lower Limb Electromyography (EMG)
C4
0.119 mV
Standard Deviation 0.077

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Force data will be measured at a single time point (in one 2-hour session) for each participant in each of 4 conditions.

Population: n=9 for grf data 1 participant No HWA condition secondary to device slipping, 1 participant no clean force plate hits due to short step length.

2 Force platforms were used to quantify ground reaction forces at terminal stance for the affected lower limbs during gait. Sample rate 1200Hz.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Walking
n=9 Participants
In this study a single group of participants were studied during one session in each of 4 conditions: control walking (CI), HWA walking (C2), Aftereffect (C3), and Late aftereffect (C4)
Ground Reaction Force at Terminal Stance
C1
103 percentage of body weight
Standard Deviation 16
Ground Reaction Force at Terminal Stance
C2
105 percentage of body weight
Standard Deviation 9
Ground Reaction Force at Terminal Stance
C3
104 percentage of body weight
Standard Deviation 9
Ground Reaction Force at Terminal Stance
C4
105 percentage of body weight
Standard Deviation 10

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Stairs will be measured at a single time point (in one 2-hour session) for each participant

A timed test of the ability to ascend and descend stairs with our without a rail. For this study a flight of 7 stairs will be used. The means of two trials of ascending and descending will be recorded. (Flansbjer et al., 2005)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Walking
n=11 Participants
In this study a single group of participants were studied during one session in each of 4 conditions: control walking (CI), HWA walking (C2), Aftereffect (C3), and Late aftereffect (C4)
Stair Climbing Ascend/Descend Test
ascend (control)
7.03 seconds
Interval 4.2 to 11.0
Stair Climbing Ascend/Descend Test
decend (control)
7.61 seconds
Interval 4.0 to 10.5
Stair Climbing Ascend/Descend Test
ascend with HWA
7.10 seconds
Interval 4.0 to 11.0
Stair Climbing Ascend/Descend Test
descend with HWA
7.99 seconds
Interval 4.1 to 9.5

Adverse Events

Walking

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Alexandra Borstad

College of St. Scholastica

Phone: 614-395-1708

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER