Trial Outcomes & Findings for Post Stroke Walking Kinematics Using the Honda Walking Assist Robotic Exoskeleton (NCT NCT03828214)
NCT ID: NCT03828214
Last Updated: 2023-03-07
Results Overview
Difference in affected leg maximum knee flexion angle (initial swing to midswing) between conditions Kinematic Analysis of Gait will be obtained using a Qualisys 8-camera motion capture system. Sample rate 120 Hz. A modified Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli (IOR) gait marker set (\~40 markers) applied bilaterally.
COMPLETED
NA
11 participants
Gait kinematics were measured in each of 4 conditions during one 2-hour session for each participant.
2023-03-07
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Walking
In this study a single group of participants were observed in each of 4 conditions: control walking (CI), HWA walking (C2), Aftereffect (C3), and Late aftereffect (C4)
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Walking
n=11 Participants
In this study a single group of participants were studied during one session in each of 4 conditions: control walking (CI), HWA walking (C2), Aftereffect (C3), and Late aftereffect (C4)
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=11 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
4 Participants
n=11 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
7 Participants
n=11 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
67.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 • n=11 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
6 Participants
n=11 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=11 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
11 Participants
n=11 Participants
|
|
Height
|
163 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=11 Participants
|
|
weight
|
81 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.2 • n=11 Participants
|
|
Stroke affected side was left
|
9 Participants
n=11 Participants
|
|
Time post stroke
|
7.3 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4 • n=11 Participants
|
|
Fugl-meyer Assessment
|
30.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 • n=11 Participants
|
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
|
22.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 • n=11 Participants
|
|
Activities Specific Balance Confidence Scale
|
72.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.2 • n=11 Participants
|
|
Steps per day
|
2783 steps
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1512 • n=11 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Gait kinematics were measured in each of 4 conditions during one 2-hour session for each participant.Population: For one participant data was not available for the C3 condition
Difference in affected leg maximum knee flexion angle (initial swing to midswing) between conditions Kinematic Analysis of Gait will be obtained using a Qualisys 8-camera motion capture system. Sample rate 120 Hz. A modified Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli (IOR) gait marker set (\~40 markers) applied bilaterally.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Walking
n=10 Participants
In this study a single group of participants were studied during one session in each of 4 conditions: control walking (CI), HWA walking (C2), Aftereffect (C3), and Late aftereffect (C4)
|
|---|---|
|
Gait Kinematics
C1
|
55.9 degrees
Standard Deviation 12.3
|
|
Gait Kinematics
C2
|
57.8 degrees
Standard Deviation 12.4
|
|
Gait Kinematics
C3
|
58.3 degrees
Standard Deviation 8.1
|
|
Gait Kinematics
C4
|
56.6 degrees
Standard Deviation 12.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Measured during swing phase of gait during each of 4 walking conditions during a single data collection session.Population: There was a single group that participated in this within subject design study, here we compare the outcome parameter across the four conditions for this group.
Average max EMG of affected tibialis anterior muscle measured during swing phase for walking conditions using Delsys Tringo EMG sensors. Sample rate 2000Hz.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Walking
n=10 Participants
In this study a single group of participants were studied during one session in each of 4 conditions: control walking (CI), HWA walking (C2), Aftereffect (C3), and Late aftereffect (C4)
|
|---|---|
|
Lower Limb Electromyography (EMG)
C3
|
0.101 mV
Standard Deviation 0.064
|
|
Lower Limb Electromyography (EMG)
C1
|
0.115 mV
Standard Deviation 0.080
|
|
Lower Limb Electromyography (EMG)
C2
|
0.115 mV
Standard Deviation 0.077
|
|
Lower Limb Electromyography (EMG)
C4
|
0.119 mV
Standard Deviation 0.077
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Force data will be measured at a single time point (in one 2-hour session) for each participant in each of 4 conditions.Population: n=9 for grf data 1 participant No HWA condition secondary to device slipping, 1 participant no clean force plate hits due to short step length.
2 Force platforms were used to quantify ground reaction forces at terminal stance for the affected lower limbs during gait. Sample rate 1200Hz.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Walking
n=9 Participants
In this study a single group of participants were studied during one session in each of 4 conditions: control walking (CI), HWA walking (C2), Aftereffect (C3), and Late aftereffect (C4)
|
|---|---|
|
Ground Reaction Force at Terminal Stance
C1
|
103 percentage of body weight
Standard Deviation 16
|
|
Ground Reaction Force at Terminal Stance
C2
|
105 percentage of body weight
Standard Deviation 9
|
|
Ground Reaction Force at Terminal Stance
C3
|
104 percentage of body weight
Standard Deviation 9
|
|
Ground Reaction Force at Terminal Stance
C4
|
105 percentage of body weight
Standard Deviation 10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Stairs will be measured at a single time point (in one 2-hour session) for each participantA timed test of the ability to ascend and descend stairs with our without a rail. For this study a flight of 7 stairs will be used. The means of two trials of ascending and descending will be recorded. (Flansbjer et al., 2005)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Walking
n=11 Participants
In this study a single group of participants were studied during one session in each of 4 conditions: control walking (CI), HWA walking (C2), Aftereffect (C3), and Late aftereffect (C4)
|
|---|---|
|
Stair Climbing Ascend/Descend Test
ascend (control)
|
7.03 seconds
Interval 4.2 to 11.0
|
|
Stair Climbing Ascend/Descend Test
decend (control)
|
7.61 seconds
Interval 4.0 to 10.5
|
|
Stair Climbing Ascend/Descend Test
ascend with HWA
|
7.10 seconds
Interval 4.0 to 11.0
|
|
Stair Climbing Ascend/Descend Test
descend with HWA
|
7.99 seconds
Interval 4.1 to 9.5
|
Adverse Events
Walking
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER