Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy Study of Inhaled Carbon Monoxide to Treat Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) (NCT NCT03799874)

First recruited subject date was 9/30/2019 and last recruited subject was 4/5/2021. The study treatment was 3 days and follow up during 60 days during hospitalization and up to 6 months follow up. Screening was conducted in Intensive Care Units and qualifying subjects were consented by study physicians at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Duke University Hospital and New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital.

After consent. Subjects were randomized to either placebo or inhaled CO. Study procedures started the following day after randomization. The study recruited a total of 4 subjects and was closed due to low enrollment.

Safety and Efficacy Study of Inhaled Carbon Monoxide to Treat Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

Safety of inhaled CO, defined by the incidence of pre-specified administration-related AEs (as defined below) and spontaneously reported AEs through study day 7. 1. Acute MI within 48 hours of study drug administration 2. Acute cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within 48 hours of study drug administration 3. New onset atrial or ventricular arrhythmia requiring DC cardioversion within 48 hours of study drug administration 4. Increased oxygenation requirements defined as: an increase in FiO2 of ≥ 0.2 AND increase in PEEP ≥ 5 cm H2O within 6 hours of study drug administration 5. Increase in COHb ≥ 10% 6. Increase in lactate by ≥ 2 mmol/L within 6 hours of study drug administration

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) plasma levels will be measured by quantitative PCR of human NADH dehydrogenase 1. The number presented is the percentage average difference from beginning to end of treatment. Limited number of measurements prevents variance analyses; therefore we present the data from the subjects available in each group and report as "Mean" without standard deviation, where measures of dispersion cannot be calculated.

The Lung Injury Score (LIS) is a composite 4-point scoring system including the PaO2/FiO2, PEEP, quasi-static respiratory compliance, and the extent of infiltrates on the chest X-ray. Each of the four components is categorized from 0 to 4, where a higher number is worse. The total Lung Injury Score is obtained by dividing the aggregate sum by the number of components used. Previous randomized clinical trials in ARDS have shown that a decreased LIS correlates with improvement in lung physiology as well as important clinical outcomes including mortality and ventilator-free days (VFDs). The number presented is the average difference from beginning to end of treatment. The limited number of measurements prevent the variance and measures of dispersion calculations; therefore we present the average of data from the available subjects in each group and report as "Mean" without standard deviation, where measures of dispersion cannot be calculated.

PaO2/FiO2 will be measured daily on days 1-5 and days 1-7 in ventilated subjects. The limited number of measurements prevent the variance and measures of dispersion calculations; therefore we present the average of data from the available subjects in each group and report as "Mean" without standard deviation, where measures of dispersion cannot be calculated.

The oxygenation index will be measured on days 1-5 and on days 1-7 in ventilated subjects. Oxygenation index is calculated as (FiO2 X mean airway pressure)/PaO2. We provide change in Oi from baseline. Oi is only measured when subjects are ventilated, therefore not all timepoints are available. The limited number of measurements prevent the variance and measures of dispersion calculations; therefore we present the average of data from the available subjects in each group and report as "Mean" without standard deviation, where measures of dispersion cannot be calculated.

The dead space fraction will be measured days 1-3 and days 1-7 in ventilated subjects. We present change in dead space fraction between initial and final measurements that were available (measurements only taken while the subjects were intubated). The limited number of measurements prevent the variance and measures of dispersion calculations; therefore we present the average of data from the available subjects in each group and report as "Mean" without standard deviation, where measures of dispersion cannot be calculated.

Organ failure will be assessed using the SOFA score. SOFA scores will be assessed daily on days 1-5 and day 7, as the SOFA score has been shown to be a reliable prognostic indicator of outcomes in critically ill patients. To calculate the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, each of the six components (Respiratory, Coagulation, Liver, Cardiovascular, Central Nervous System, Renal) is categorized from 0-4, where a higher number is worse. The SOFA score (0-24) will be calculated by summing all six components. We present changes in SOFA score over the time of hospitalization, over the time of ICU admission (up to days 5 and 7 for the enrolled subjects). The limited number of measurements prevent the variance and measures of dispersion calculations; therefore we present the average of data from the available subjects in each group and report as "Mean" without standard deviation, where measures of dispersion cannot be calculated.

Cytokine plasma levels (eg. IL-1B) will be measured by ELISA daily on days 1-3 and on day 4. We report the absolute Mean Fluorescent Intensity (MFI) of each sample at pretreatment time point of day 4. Limited number of measurements prevents variance and measures of dispersion analyses; therefore we present the data from the subjects available in each group and report as "Number" without standard deviation, since measures of dispersion cannot be calculated.

Lipid mediators (LM) and specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs) will be measured in plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) based methods daily on days 1-3 and on day 4. The percentage change from baseline at day 1 to post treatment at day 4 is reported. A representative LM is shown (14-HDHA (14-hydroxy-4Z,7Z,10Z,12E,16Z,19Z-docosahexaenoic acid) is an oxidized metabolite of omega-3 docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)). Limited number of measurements prevents variance and measures of dispersion analyses; therefore we present the data from the subjects available in each group and report as "Number" without standard deviation, since measures of dispersion cannot be calculated.

Ventilator-free days to day 28 are defined as the number of days from the time of initiating unassisted breathing to day 28 after randomization, assuming survival for at least two consecutive calendar days after initiating unassisted breathing and continued unassisted breathing to day 28. If a subject returns to assisted breathing and subsequently achieves unassisted breathing to day 28, VFDs will be counted from the end of the last period of assisted breathing to day 28. Participants who do not survive to day 28 are assigned zero ventilator-free days. The limited number of measurements prevent the variance and measures of dispersion calculations; therefore we present the average of data from the available subjects in each group and report as "Mean" without standard deviation, where measures of dispersion cannot be calculated.

ICU-free days are the number of days that the patient is alive and free from ICU care within 28 days. Is calculated by subtracting the total number of days that the patient is free from the ICU from 28. Patients who die within 28 days are automatically assigned "0" ICU free days. We present data of ICU free days for enrolled subjects. The limited number of measurements prevent the variance and measures of dispersion calculations; therefore we present the average of data from the available subjects in each group and report as "Mean" without standard deviation, where measures of dispersion cannot be calculated.

Hospital-free days will be assessed on day 60. Hospital-free days are days alive post hospital discharge through day 60. Patients who die on or prior to day 60 are assigned zero hospital-free days. We present hospital free days at day 60. The limited number of measurements prevent the variance and measures of dispersion calculations; therefore we present the average of data from the available subjects in each group and report as "Mean" without standard deviation, where measures of dispersion cannot be calculated.

Mortality will be assessed on day 28 and day 60

Montreal Cognitive Assessment - Blind Version (MoCA-Blind) The MoCA-Blind is a remote adaptation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) used as a screening assessment for detecting cognitive impairment. It is administered via telephone interview. The MoCA-Blind assesses the following cognitive domains (points): - Attention (0-6) - Language: (0-3 (Repetition (0-2) and fluency (0-1)) - Abstraction (0-2) - Memory: Delayed recall (0-5) - Orientation (0-6) The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 22 points. Calculated as the sum of all domains. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive functioning (greater cognitive impairment). A score of 18 or above is within the normal range. Limited number of measurements prevents variance and measures of dispersion analyses; therefore we present the data from the subjects available in each group and report as "Number", since given measures of dispersion cannot be calculated.

The Hayling Sentence Completion Test assesses executive functioning (response initiation and inhibition), administered via telephone. With 30 sentence-completion items split into 2 sections (15 each). Sections: - 1: Response initiation (time to provide a contextually appropriate word). - 2: Response inhibition (time and error score for providing an unrelated word). Scores (response time and errors) from both sections are combined and converted to an age-adjusted standardized total score. Total combined standardized score ranges from 1-10: 1: Impaired 2: Abnormal 3: Poor 4: Low Average 5: Moderate Average 6: Average 7: High Average 8: Good 9: Superior 10: Very Superior Higher scores= Better executive functioning Lower scores= Greater impairment. Limited number of measurements prevents variance and measures of dispersion analyses; therefore we present the data from the subjects available in each group and report as "Number", since given measures of dispersion cannot be calculated.