The Impact of Nerve Cross Section Area on Sensory Block Onset

NCT03797235 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 15

Last updated 2020-05-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The study aims to describe a correlation between the nerve cross section and the sensory or motor block onset time. Therefore, different nerve cross sections with their Motor and sensory onset times are compared in order to find a correlation.

In the case of discovering a correlation, this could be translated into clinical practice, where a more tailored and individualized approach to performing peripheral nerve blocks would be possible, thus lowering the risks of adverse events occurring.

Conditions

  • Regional Anesthesia

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Dominant Arm

The volume of local anesthetic used for the block of the ulnar and median nerve will be 5 times the estimated 95% effective dose (ED 95 ) of LA needed to block the nerve relative to the nerve cross-sectional area. The ED 95 for the ulnar nerve has been elucidated to be 0,11ml/mm2. The same ED 95 will be used for the median nerve.

PROCEDURE

Non-dominant arm

The volume of local anesthetic used for the block of the ulnar and median nerve will be 5 times the estimated 95% effective dose (ED 95 ) of LA needed to block the nerve relative to the nerve cross-sectional area. The ED 95 for the ulnar nerve has been elucidated to be 0,11ml/mm2. The same ED 95 will be used for the median nerve.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Jose Aguirre

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • José Aguirre, PD Dr Med · Der Balgrist

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
64 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-01-19
Primary Completion
2019-06-20
Completion
2019-06-21

Countries

  • Switzerland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03797235 on ClinicalTrials.gov