Effect of Pupilometer Guided Analgesia on Postoperative Pain
NCT03794271 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 84
Last updated 2019-08-12
Summary
In this study, the investigators measure a pupil size every 5 minutes during the operation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. The investigators would compare the postoperative pain intensity between the group adjusted the anesthetic drug concentration based on the changes of the pupil (Pupil group) and the group based on the changes of a surgical pleth index (SPI group).
Conditions
- Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
- Anesthesia, General
- Reflex, Pupillary
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Pupilometer guided anesthesia
At least 10 min after anesthesia induction by target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil, baseline values for pupillary diameter is recorded before any surgical procedure. During the operation, propofol effect-site target concentration (Ce) is adjusted to maintain the bispectral index (BIS) value between 40 and 60. Remifentanil Ce is adapted every 5 min based on the changes of pupillary diameter. If the pupillary diameter is increased by more than 30% compared to baseline value, remifentanil concentration is increased by 0.5 ng/ml. If the pupillary diameter is maintained between 5 and 30 % change compared with baseline, remifentanil is not modified. In a case of pupillary diameter is decreased less than 5 % change of baseline, remifentanil concentration is decreased by 0.5 ng/ml.
- PROCEDURE
-
SPI guided anesthesia
During the operation, SPI value should be maintained between 20 and 50 by changing the infusion rate of remifentanil. Even if the SPI is maintained within the target range, the remifentanil infusion rate is increased by 0.5 ng/ml in a case of the SPI value suddenly arises by more than 10.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Eugene Kim, MD, PhD · Assistant professor
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-01-03
- Primary Completion
- 2019-05-09
- Completion
- 2019-05-10
Countries
- South Korea
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effect of Pulmonary Recruitment Maneuver (PRM) on Pain and Nausea After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT03026543 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine and Intraperitoneal Lidocaine Irrigation on Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01608373 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
COMPARISON OF INTRAOPERATIVE LOCAL ANESTHETIC APPLICATIONS IN POSTOPERATIVE PAIN MANAGEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY PATIENTS
NCT03790007 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Feasibility and Safety of a Three-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using a 2-mm Mini-Instrument
NCT01571479 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block Versus Intraperitoneal and Periportal Bupivacaine Infiltration in Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT06721039 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Spinal for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02768376 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Low-pressure vs Standard-pressure in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04146090 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic-Assisted Transversus Abdominus Plane Block Versus Intraperitoneal Irrigation of Local Anesthetic for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT06714279 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Evaluation of the Interest of the Instillation of Saline Intraperitoneally (INSI ) Versus Instillation of Naropin the Surgical Site Versus Lung Recruitment Maneuvers ( PVM ) in the Management of Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Ambulatory Care
NCT02819544 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Unilateral Laparoscopic TAP Block vs. Local Infiltration in Post-Cholecystectomy Analgesia
NCT07176299 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Quality of Recovery Under Low or Standard Pneumoperitoneum Pressure
NCT05040022 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01595165 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Multimodal Analgesia for Cholecystectomy
NCT04788654 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Lidocaine and Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT03620591 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Pain After Instillation Of Bupivacaine During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT07098429 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Postoperative Pain Results According to Pressure to Form Pneumoperitoneum
NCT04398810 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Chronic Abdominal Pain After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT06686875 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Comparison of Oblique Subcostal, Posterior or Dual Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04693156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Vitamin C on Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02553551 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Lidocaine Patch for Shoulder Pain in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02827136 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Quality of Recovery After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Comparing Opioid Free Analgesia Versus Opioid Free Anesthesia
NCT06343753 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Low-pressure Pneumoperitoneum on Pain and Inflammation Post Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04779515 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Quadratus Lumborum Block vs Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Post-cholecystectomy Analgesia
NCT03323684 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Implications of Different Analgesic Models on Inflammatory Markers After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04609033 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analgesic Efficacy of Adding Dexmedetomidine to Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Subcostal Transverse Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT07075913 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA