MedTrace Logo

Mechanochemical Ablation vs Thermal Ablation

NCT03722134 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 132

Last updated 2021-02-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Patients with GSV reflux were randomized to undergo either MOCA or thermal ablation with laser or radiofrequency. The main outcome measure was the occlusion rate of the GSV at one year.Patients with GSV reflux were randomized to undergo either MOCA or thermal ablation with laser or radiofrequency. The main outcome measure was the occlusion rate of the GSV at one and three years.

Conditions

  • Varicose Veins of Lower Limb

Interventions

PROCEDURE

MOCA

Great saphenous vein occlusion with a mechanochemical chateter which cause mechanical injury to vessel intima and gives sclerosant to the intima.

PROCEDURE

EVLA

Great saphenous vein occlusion with a thermal laser chateter

PROCEDURE

RFA

Great saphenous vein occlusion with a thermal radiofrequency chateter

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Helsinki University Central Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-01-31
Primary Completion
2020-12-31
Completion
2020-12-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03722134 on ClinicalTrials.gov