Post-Operative Outcomes of Low Thermal Dissection vs. Traditional Electrosurgery
NCT03711916 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2019-06-18
Summary
Low thermal dissection devices have been introduced as a tool to improve surgical outcomes. PlasmaBlade, a low thermal dissection device, has shown to be associated with effective cutting, and significantly lower temperature than traditional electrosurgical dissection device. Thus, low thermal devices would improve flap perfusion by decreasing the thermal injury resulted by the dissection. Looking into the use of low thermal devices in cases of mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction has not been documented. The aim of this study is to determine if there are clinical flap perfusion, surgical site drainage, and pain scores differences between mastectomy flaps created using low thermal dissection device and those done with the standard care of Bovie cautery in order to warrant a formal study.
Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Mastectomy
- Perfusion; Complications
- Hemostasis
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
PlasmaBlade 3.0S
PlasmaBlade (Medtronic) is approved by United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a low thermal dissection device that has shown to be associated with effective cutting, and significantly lower temperature than traditional electrosurgical dissection devices.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- collaborator INDUSTRY
-
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mehran Habibi, MD · Johns Hopkins Medicine Department of Surgery
-
Gedge D Rosson, MD · Johns Hopkins Medicine Department of Plastic, Reconstructive & Maxillofacial Surgery
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-03-17
- Primary Completion
- 2018-10-24
- Completion
- 2018-12-03
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Traditional Electrosurgery System Versus Low Thermal Tissue Dissection System for Total Mastectomy
NCT03167944 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Low Energy Dissection Vs. Electrocautery in Lumpectomy Shaved Surgical Margins
NCT03718442 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Intraoperative Pathway in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
NCT00543764 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
BENEFIT OF MECHANICAL ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING ON TOLERANCE OF ADIPOSE TISSUE TO ISCHEMIA REPERFUSION OF TYPE DIEP (DEEP INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC PERFORATOR) FREE FLAPS.
NCT05373069 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Perioperative Care of Breast Reconstruction With Latissimus Dorsi Flap and Tissue Expander: Early Discharge Protocol in a Day Surgery Setting
NCT02791672 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Immediate Axillary Plasty With a Pedicled Muscle Flap for Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prevention
NCT02318615 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Minimal Access Versus Conventional Latissimus Dorsi Flap Harvest for Breast Reconstruction
NCT06319157 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility and Safety of Single-Port Robotic-Assisted Deep Inferior Epigastric Pedicle Flap Harvest
NCT07222514 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of the Superficial Inferior Epigastric System in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flaps
NCT01464970 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
ciNPT in Autologous DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
NCT05907941 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Prototype Tri-modal Imaging Device for Breast Cancer
NCT02794064 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Retrospective and Prospective Evaluation of Scapulohumeral Comfort, Aesthetic Result and Quality of Life
NCT05316389 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Serratus and Parasternal Infrapectoral Block for Breast Surgery.
NCT03708302 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Interactive Design of Patient-Specific Molds for Tissue Shaping
NCT06711965 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Optimizing Decision Making About Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Patient-Centered Approach
NCT03346161 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Matrix Rotation Flap Versus Single Incision Lateral Sulcus Mammoplasty
NCT07022509 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy; Should we Preserve the Pectoral Fascia?
NCT05391763 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Symptom Management After Breast Cancer Surgery
NCT00686127 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Delayed-Immediate Breast Reconstruction
NCT00473122 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Preoperative Evaluation of 3D Reconstruction Tool for Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
NCT06071234 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Unilateral Secondary Breast Reconstruction Using a Muscle-sparing Pedicled Dorsal Flap After Breast Cancer
NCT06230250 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Secondary Breast Reconstruction With a Flap of Skin From the Back
NCT02169011 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Serratus Plane Block in Preventing Postoperative Pain of Mastectomy
NCT03615430 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Delaying the Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery (SIEA) Flap and Determining the Change in SIEA Diameter and Blood Flow
NCT01247129 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Mastectomy With Retention of the Nipple-areola Complex, Robot-assisted or Not, and / or Immediate or Seconday Reconstruction by Latissimus Dorsi Flap, Robot-assisted or Not.
NCT04457167 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA