Trial Outcomes & Findings for Design Validation of Senofilcon A With New UV-blocking Additive (NCT NCT03707821)

NCT ID: NCT03707821

Last Updated: 2019-12-05

Results Overview

Overall comfort was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patientexperience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

253 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

2-Week Follow-up Evlauation

Results posted on

2019-12-05

Participant Flow

A total of 253 subjects were enrolled into this study. Of those 2 subjects failed to meet all eligibility criteria and 251 subjects were dispensed a study lens. of the dispensed subjects 248 completed the study while 3 subjects were discontinued.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Test
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
Control
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes throughout the entire duration of the study.
Overall Study
STARTED
125
126
Overall Study
COMPLETED
123
125
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Test
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
Control
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes throughout the entire duration of the study.
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
0
1
Overall Study
Unsatisfactory Visual Response
1
0
Overall Study
Unsatisfactory Lens Fitting
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

Design Validation of Senofilcon A With New UV-blocking Additive

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Test
n=125 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
Control
n=126 Participants
All subjects dispensed the Control lens in both eyes throughout the entire duration of the study.
Total
n=251 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
30.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.59 • n=99 Participants
31.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.73 • n=107 Participants
31.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.67 • n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
85 Participants
n=99 Participants
84 Participants
n=107 Participants
169 Participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
40 Participants
n=99 Participants
42 Participants
n=107 Participants
82 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
11 Participants
n=107 Participants
21 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
115 Participants
n=99 Participants
109 Participants
n=107 Participants
224 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
125 Participants
n=99 Participants
126 Participants
n=107 Participants
251 Participants
n=206 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2-Week Follow-up Evlauation

Population: All subjects that completed the study without a major protocol deviation impacting a primary endpoint.

Overall comfort was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patientexperience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test
n=122 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
Control
n=124 Participants
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
Overall Comfort Score
64.7 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 21.33
62.6 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 23.38

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2-Week Follow-up Evaluation

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation impacting a primary endpoint.

Vision satisfaction in bright light was assessed using the individual item" I was satisfied with the quality of my vision in bright lighting" from the CLUE™ questionnaire. This item used the response scale, 1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3: Neither Agree nor Disagree, 4: Agree and 5: Strongly Agree. CLUE is the Contact Lens User Experience™ questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The Proportion of responses in each category were reported for each lens type.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test
n=122 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
Control
n=124 Participants
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting
Strongly Agree
30.3 Percentage of subjects
19.4 Percentage of subjects
Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting
Strongly Disagree
0 Percentage of subjects
0.8 Percentage of subjects
Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting
Agree
59.0 Percentage of subjects
58.1 Percentage of subjects
Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting
Neither Agree nor Disagree
6.6 Percentage of subjects
12.9 Percentage of subjects
Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting
Disagree
4.1 Percentage of subjects
8.1 Percentage of subjects

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2-Week Follow-up Evlauation

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation impacting a primary endpoint.

Distance visual acuity was assessed by eye using LogMAR visual acuity at 4 meters using an ETDRS chart under high illumination high contrast conditions (room illumination \> 400 lux and chart luminance 120-200 cd/m2) at the 2-week follow-up for each subject eye. Lower values of logMAR indicate better vision, where a score of 0.0 equates to 20/20 snellen vision. The average visual acuity for each lens was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test
n=244 eyes
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
Control
n=248 eyes
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
Distance Visual Acuity
-0.131 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.0913
-0.107 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.0861

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 2-Week Follow-up

Population: All subjects that were dispsensed a study lens.

Acceptable lens fit will be assessed at all study visits (scheduled and unscheduled) for each subject eye. Fit acceptance rate will be based on the lens fit acceptance of eyes wearing the Test lens only. Fit acceptance is a binary response where Y=1 if lens fit is acceptable and Y=0 otherwise. Unacceptable is defined as unacceptable if any one of the following criteria: * limbal exposure at primary gaze or with extreme eye movement; * edge lift; * excessive movement in primary up gaze; * insufficient movement in all three of the following conditions: primary gaze, up gaze, and push up test. Eyes with multiple unacceptable fitting events will be counted only once. Fit rates of the Control lens will also be collected but are not a primary endpoint.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test
n=250 eyes
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
Control
n=252 eyes
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
Contact Lens Fitting Acceptance Rate
99.2 Percentage of eyes
100 Percentage of eyes

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 2-Week Follow-up Evlauation

Population: All subjects that were dispensed a study lens.

Slit Lamp Findings (SLF) were assessed using a biomicroscope and was graded using the FDA grading scale (Grade: 0, 1,2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of findings and 1 to 4 representing successively worse findings (i.e. Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). Slit Lamp Findings will be assessed for each subject eye at all study visits (schedule and unscheduled). SLF is a binary response where Y=1 for at least one Grade 3 or 4 slit lamp finding. The percentage of eyes with Grade 3 or higher slit lamp findings will be analyzed and will include corneal infiltrates. Eyes with multiple events will be counted only once. The number of eyes with SLF with grade 3 or higher by lens was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test
n=250 eyes
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
Control
n=252 eyes
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
Number of Grade 3 or Higher Slit Lamp Findings
0 Number of eyes
0 Number of eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2-Week Follow-up Evlauation

Population: All subjects that completed the study without a major protocol deviation impacting a primary endpoint.

Overall handling was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patientexperience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test
n=122 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
Control
n=124 Participants
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
Overall Handling Score
70.9 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 17.24
68.7 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.55

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2-Week Follow-up Evlauation

Population: All subjects that completed the study without a major protocol deviation impacting a primary endpoint.

Overall quality of vision was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patientexperience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test
n=122 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
Control
n=124 Participants
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
Overall Quality of Vision Score
66.4 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 19.19
60.9 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 22.33

Adverse Events

Test

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Control

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

John Buch OD, MS, FAAO Sr. Principal Research Optometrist

Johnson & Johnson VIsion

Phone: 9044431707

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: GT60