Trial Outcomes & Findings for Design Validation of Senofilcon A With New UV-blocking Additive (NCT NCT03707821)
NCT ID: NCT03707821
Last Updated: 2019-12-05
Results Overview
Overall comfort was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patientexperience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
COMPLETED
NA
253 participants
2-Week Follow-up Evlauation
2019-12-05
Participant Flow
A total of 253 subjects were enrolled into this study. Of those 2 subjects failed to meet all eligibility criteria and 251 subjects were dispensed a study lens. of the dispensed subjects 248 completed the study while 3 subjects were discontinued.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Test
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
|
Control
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes throughout the entire duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
125
|
126
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
123
|
125
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Test
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
|
Control
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes throughout the entire duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Unsatisfactory Visual Response
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Unsatisfactory Lens Fitting
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Design Validation of Senofilcon A With New UV-blocking Additive
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Test
n=125 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
|
Control
n=126 Participants
All subjects dispensed the Control lens in both eyes throughout the entire duration of the study.
|
Total
n=251 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
30.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.59 • n=99 Participants
|
31.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.73 • n=107 Participants
|
31.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.67 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
85 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
84 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
169 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
40 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
82 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
115 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
109 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
224 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
125 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
126 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
251 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2-Week Follow-up EvlauationPopulation: All subjects that completed the study without a major protocol deviation impacting a primary endpoint.
Overall comfort was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patientexperience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test
n=122 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
|
Control
n=124 Participants
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Comfort Score
|
64.7 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 21.33
|
62.6 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 23.38
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2-Week Follow-up EvaluationPopulation: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation impacting a primary endpoint.
Vision satisfaction in bright light was assessed using the individual item" I was satisfied with the quality of my vision in bright lighting" from the CLUE™ questionnaire. This item used the response scale, 1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3: Neither Agree nor Disagree, 4: Agree and 5: Strongly Agree. CLUE is the Contact Lens User Experience™ questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The Proportion of responses in each category were reported for each lens type.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test
n=122 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
|
Control
n=124 Participants
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting
Strongly Agree
|
30.3 Percentage of subjects
|
19.4 Percentage of subjects
|
|
Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting
Strongly Disagree
|
0 Percentage of subjects
|
0.8 Percentage of subjects
|
|
Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting
Agree
|
59.0 Percentage of subjects
|
58.1 Percentage of subjects
|
|
Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting
Neither Agree nor Disagree
|
6.6 Percentage of subjects
|
12.9 Percentage of subjects
|
|
Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting
Disagree
|
4.1 Percentage of subjects
|
8.1 Percentage of subjects
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2-Week Follow-up EvlauationPopulation: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation impacting a primary endpoint.
Distance visual acuity was assessed by eye using LogMAR visual acuity at 4 meters using an ETDRS chart under high illumination high contrast conditions (room illumination \> 400 lux and chart luminance 120-200 cd/m2) at the 2-week follow-up for each subject eye. Lower values of logMAR indicate better vision, where a score of 0.0 equates to 20/20 snellen vision. The average visual acuity for each lens was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test
n=244 eyes
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
|
Control
n=248 eyes
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Distance Visual Acuity
|
-0.131 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.0913
|
-0.107 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.0861
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 2-Week Follow-upPopulation: All subjects that were dispsensed a study lens.
Acceptable lens fit will be assessed at all study visits (scheduled and unscheduled) for each subject eye. Fit acceptance rate will be based on the lens fit acceptance of eyes wearing the Test lens only. Fit acceptance is a binary response where Y=1 if lens fit is acceptable and Y=0 otherwise. Unacceptable is defined as unacceptable if any one of the following criteria: * limbal exposure at primary gaze or with extreme eye movement; * edge lift; * excessive movement in primary up gaze; * insufficient movement in all three of the following conditions: primary gaze, up gaze, and push up test. Eyes with multiple unacceptable fitting events will be counted only once. Fit rates of the Control lens will also be collected but are not a primary endpoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test
n=250 eyes
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
|
Control
n=252 eyes
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Contact Lens Fitting Acceptance Rate
|
99.2 Percentage of eyes
|
100 Percentage of eyes
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 2-Week Follow-up EvlauationPopulation: All subjects that were dispensed a study lens.
Slit Lamp Findings (SLF) were assessed using a biomicroscope and was graded using the FDA grading scale (Grade: 0, 1,2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of findings and 1 to 4 representing successively worse findings (i.e. Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). Slit Lamp Findings will be assessed for each subject eye at all study visits (schedule and unscheduled). SLF is a binary response where Y=1 for at least one Grade 3 or 4 slit lamp finding. The percentage of eyes with Grade 3 or higher slit lamp findings will be analyzed and will include corneal infiltrates. Eyes with multiple events will be counted only once. The number of eyes with SLF with grade 3 or higher by lens was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test
n=250 eyes
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
|
Control
n=252 eyes
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Grade 3 or Higher Slit Lamp Findings
|
0 Number of eyes
|
0 Number of eyes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2-Week Follow-up EvlauationPopulation: All subjects that completed the study without a major protocol deviation impacting a primary endpoint.
Overall handling was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patientexperience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test
n=122 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
|
Control
n=124 Participants
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Handling Score
|
70.9 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 17.24
|
68.7 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.55
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2-Week Follow-up EvlauationPopulation: All subjects that completed the study without a major protocol deviation impacting a primary endpoint.
Overall quality of vision was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patientexperience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test
n=122 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
|
Control
n=124 Participants
Subjects that wore the Control lens in both eyes during the entire duraiton of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Quality of Vision Score
|
66.4 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 19.19
|
60.9 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 22.33
|
Adverse Events
Test
Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
John Buch OD, MS, FAAO Sr. Principal Research Optometrist
Johnson & Johnson VIsion
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60