ROTEM Versus aPTT/PT in Pediatric Surgery

NCT03699813 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 45

Last updated 2018-10-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Hemocoagulation management in perioperative bleeding is nowadays based on standard coagulation testing: activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen, D-dimers, platelets. An interest about viscoelastic coagulation testing methods is rising - use of rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is mentioned in the newest European guidelines for hemostasis management. ROTEM has more advantages then standard tests. However, both tests have only grade 1C recommendation, and most of trials have been done on adults. The goal of the study is to compare a relationship between standard tests and ROTEM in pediatric patients in perioperative period to find out which test has better correlation with clinical status, to compare therapeutic strategies and time necessary for gain both of tests and to compare the difference in blood loss and blood products consumption in group treated by ROTEM versus standard tests. Reduced blood loss and amount of blood products transfusion is expected to be found in ROTEM group, representing lowering risk for the patient, all due to early evaluation of hemocoagulation and targeted therapy guided by ROTEM.

Conditions

  • Coagulation Defect; Bleeding

Interventions

OTHER

Comparison of two approaches to bleeding management

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Motol

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
5 Years
Max Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-02-02
Primary Completion
2018-09-15
Completion
2018-09-15

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03699813 on ClinicalTrials.gov