Trial Outcomes & Findings for Lay Health Worker Engage, Educate, and Encourage Patients to Share (NCT NCT03699748)
NCT ID: NCT03699748
Last Updated: 2023-07-07
Results Overview
Each patient will receive a quality of life survey (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey) at baseline and 4 months. We will measure the change in quality of life at baseline to 4 months. Scores for quality of life will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G), a 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of HRQOL in cancer patients: Physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Each question is a 5-point likert scale item. Scores range from 0-108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
COMPLETED
NA
160 participants
Change in Quality of Life from Baseline to 4 Months
2023-07-07
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
The control group arm participants receive usual care as provided by Unite Here Health and their local oncologists.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, including: education on early advance care planning, documenting goals of care, assessing symptoms, and coordinating community services (such as home health, home visits, and home hospice). The intervention arm participants also receive usual care as provided by Unite Here Health and their local oncologists.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
80
|
80
|
|
Overall Study
Completed Baseline Survey
|
80
|
80
|
|
Overall Study
Completed 4 Month Survey
|
74
|
71
|
|
Overall Study
Completed 12 Month Survey
|
59
|
57
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
58
|
57
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
22
|
23
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Lay Health Worker Engage, Educate, and Encourage Patients to Share
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=80 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
Total
n=160 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
58 years
n=99 Participants
|
58 years
n=107 Participants
|
58 years
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
|
37 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
42 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Non-binary
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
21 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
59 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
113 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
18 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
23 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
38 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
82 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
80 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
80 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
160 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Annual household income
< $25,000
|
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Annual household income
≥ $25,000 to $34,999.00
|
50 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
103 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Annual household income
≥ $35,000 to $49,999.00
|
20 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
City
Atlantic City, NJ
|
53 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
108 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
City
Chicago, IL
|
27 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Education Level
Less than high school
|
61 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
129 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Education Level
High school
|
15 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Education Level
2-year college or Bachelor degree
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Anatomic site of cancer diagnosis
Breast
|
22 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Anatomic site of cancer diagnosis
Gastrointestinal
|
16 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Anatomic site of cancer diagnosis
Genitourinary
|
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Anatomic site of cancer diagnosis
Lung
|
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Anatomic site of cancer diagnosis
Ovarian
|
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Anatomic site of cancer diagnosis
Malignant hematologic
|
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Anatomic site of cancer diagnosis
Head and Neck
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Anatomic site of cancer diagnosis
Other (skin, soft tissue, brain)
|
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Change in Quality of Life from Baseline to 4 MonthsPopulation: Participants who completed the survey at each respective time point are included in the analysis.
Each patient will receive a quality of life survey (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey) at baseline and 4 months. We will measure the change in quality of life at baseline to 4 months. Scores for quality of life will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G), a 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of HRQOL in cancer patients: Physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Each question is a 5-point likert scale item. Scores range from 0-108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=80 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Quality of Life Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey
Baseline
|
74.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.5
|
73.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.8
|
|
Patient Quality of Life Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey
Month 4
|
70.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.8
|
80.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Proportion of patients who strongly agree that decisions about their health care were theirs to make at 4 months post study enrollment.Population: At 4 Months, 74 (92.5%) in the control group and 71 (88.8%) in the intervention group completed this survey and 6 (7.5%) participants in the control group and 9 (11.3%) participants in the intervention group had died by the time of this assessment.
The validated Satisfaction with Decision (SWD) Survey was administered to all participants at 4 months after study enrollment. The SWD is a 6-item questionnaire, where respondents rate their agreement with 6 statements (e.g. "I am satisfied that I am adequately informed about the issues important to my decision") on a likert-type scale. Answer options were (1) Strongly Disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither Agree nor Disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly Agree. Responses to each item were averaged to give a score of 0 to 5 where 0 indicated lowest satisfaction and 5 indicated most satisfied with decision making. Scores for each group were averaged at 4 months after study enrollment. Results are expressed as a proportion of participants who responded "strongly agree" at 4 months post-enrollment on the SWD scale, which measured ratings of decision-making. Changes in the proportion of participants who responded "strongly agree" are reflected from baseline to 4 months post-enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=74 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=71 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Decision-Making Using the Satisfaction With Decision (SWD) Survey
|
23 Participants
|
64 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Proportion of patients who strongly agree that decisions about their health care were theirs to make at 12 months post study enrollment.Population: A total of 59 participants (73.8%) in the control group and 56 (70.0%) in the intervention group completed this survey question at 12-months post study enrollment; 21 (26.3%) participants in the control group and 23 (28.8%) participants in the intervention group had died at the time of the 12-month assessment.
The validated Satisfaction with Decision (SWD) Survey was administered to all participants at 12 months after study enrollment. The SWD is a 6-item questionnaire, where respondents rate their agreement with 6 statements (e.g. "I am satisfied that I am adequately informed about the issues important to my decision") on a likert-type scale. Answer options were (1) Strongly Disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither Agree nor Disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly Agree. Responses to each item were averaged to give a score of 0 to 5 where 0 indicated lowest satisfaction and 5 indicated most satisfied with decision making. Scores for each group are averaged at 12 months after study enrollment. Results are expressed as a proportion of participants who responded "strongly agree" at 12 months post-enrollment on the SWD scale, which measured ratings of decision-making. Changes in the proportion of participants who responded "strongly agree" are reflected from baseline to 12 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=59 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=56 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Decision-Making Using the Satisfaction With Decision Survey
|
16 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Change in Patient Activation Measure from baseline to 4 months post enrollment.Population: Missingness was only observed due to death among 6 (7.5%) participants in the control group and 9 (11.3%) participants in the intervention group who had died prior to the 4-month assessment.
Each patient will receive the 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) at 4 months after study enrollment. This is a validated measure from Insignia Health. Each item is rated on 4-point scale (1 strongly disagree to 4 strongly agree, with additional "not applicable" option). Higher scores indicate greater patient activation. For the PAM-13, minimum score is 0 and maximum is 100. Raw scores are converted into activation levels per the scoring guidelines by Insignia Health for: level 1 Disengaged and Overwhelmed, level 2 Becoming Aware but Still Struggling, level 3 Taking Action and Gaining Control, level 4 Maintaining Behaviors and Pushing Further. Scores for each group will be averaged at 4 months after study enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=74 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=71 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Activation Using the Patient Activation Measure Survey
Baseline
|
53.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.3
|
53.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.80
|
|
Patient Activation Using the Patient Activation Measure Survey
4 Months
|
53.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.1
|
65.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Change in Patient Activation Measure from baseline to 12 months post-enrollment.Population: Missingness was only observed due to death among 21 (26.3%) participants in the control group and 23 (28.8%) participants in the intervention group who had died prior to this 12-month assessment.
Each patient will receive the 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) at 12 months after study enrollment. This is a validated measure from Insignia Health. Each item is rated on 4-point scale (1 strongly disagree to 4 strongly agree, with additional "not applicable" option). Higher scores indicate greater patient activation. For the PAM-13, minimum score is 0 and maximum is 100 (highest level of activation). Raw scores are converted into activation levels per the scoring guidelines by Insignia Health for: level 1 Disengaged and Overwhelmed, level 2 Becoming Aware but Still Struggling, level 3 Taking Action and Gaining Control, level 4 Maintaining Behaviors and Pushing Further. Scores for each group will be averaged 12 months after study enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=58 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=57 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Activation Using the Patient Activation Measure Survey
|
57.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.8
|
77.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Health-related quality of life at 12 monthsPopulation: Participants who completed the survey at 12 months are included in the analysis.
Each patient will receive a quality of life survey (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey) at 12 months. Scores for quality of life will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey-General survey. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of HRQOL in cancer patients: Physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Each question is a 5-point likert scale item. Scores range from 0-108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=59 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=57 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Quality of Life Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey
|
73.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.6
|
84.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 months after patient enrollmentPopulation: All enrolled participants
Emergency Department Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=80 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Emergency Department Visit (Chart Review)
|
15 Emergency Department Visits
|
12 Emergency Department Visits
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months after patient enrollmentEmergency Department Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=80 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Emergency Department Visit (Chart Review)
|
24 Emergency Department Visits
|
27 Emergency Department Visits
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Last 30 days of life up to 12 months from patient enrollmentPopulation: Sample of 21 participants in the control group and 23 participants in the intervention group who died within 12 months of study enrollment.
Emergency Department Use will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who is deceased within 12 months of enrollment, looking at their ER visits during the last 30 days of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=21 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=23 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Emergency Department Visit (Chart Review)
|
3 Emergency Department Visits
|
1 Emergency Department Visits
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 months after patient enrollmentHospitalization use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=80 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hospitalization Visit (Chart Review)
|
16 Hospital Visits
|
32 Hospital Visits
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months after study enrollmentHospitalization use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=80 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hospitalization Visits (Chart Review)
|
50 Hospital Visits
|
33 Hospital Visits
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: last 30 days of lifePopulation: sample of 21 participants in the control group and 23 participants in the intervention group who died within 12 months of study enrollment
Hospitalization use will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who is deceased within12 months of enrollment, looking at their hospital visits during the last 30 days of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=21 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=23 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hospitalization Visits (Chart Review)
|
3 Hospital Visits
|
6 Hospital Visits
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 months after patient enrollmentAdvance Directive documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=80 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Advance Directive Documentation (Chart Review)
Baseline
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Advance Directive Documentation (Chart Review)
4 Months
|
15 Participants
|
46 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months after patient enrollmentAdvance Directive documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=80 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Advance Directive Documentation (Chart Review)
|
55 Participants
|
72 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 months after patient enrollmentPhysician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=80 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (Chart Review)
|
5 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months after patient enrollmentPhysician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=80 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (Chart Review)
|
13 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 months after patient enrollmentGoals of Care documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=80 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Goals of Care Documentation (Chart Review)
|
10 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months after patient enrollmentGoals of Care documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=80 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Goals of Care Documentation (Chart Review)
|
23 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months after patient enrollmentTotal Costs of Care will be evaluated by review of claims data from time of enrollment until 12 months post-enrollment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=80 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Total Costs of Care
|
153,980.60 US Dollars
|
72,585.06 US Dollars
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Last 30 days of life up to 12 months from patient enrollmentPopulation: sample of 21 participants in the control group and 23 participants in the intervention group who died within 12 months of study enrollment.
Total Costs of Care during the last 30 days of life will be evaluated by review of claims data from the 30 days preceding death for those patients who become deceased within 12 months of study enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=21 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=23 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Total Costs of Care End of Life
|
6,211 US Dollars
|
5,471 US Dollars
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 months after patient enrollmentPalliative Care Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=80 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Palliative Care Use (Chart Review)
|
5 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months after patient enrollmentPalliative Care Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=80 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Palliative Care Use (Chart Review)
|
13 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: last 30 days of lifePopulation: sample of 21 participants in the control group and 23 participants in the intervention group who died within 12 months of study enrollment.
Palliative Care Use will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who is deceased within12 months of enrollment, looking at their palliative care usage during the last 30 days of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=21 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=23 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Palliative Care Use (Chart Review)
|
6 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 months after patient enrollmentHospice Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=80 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hospice Use (Chart Review)
|
2 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months after patient enrollmentHospice Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=80 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hospice Use (Chart Review)
|
6 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: last 30 days of lifePopulation: sample of 21 participants in the control group and 23 participants in the intervention group who died within 12 months of study enrollment
Hospice Use will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who is deceased within12 months of enrollment, looking at their hospice use during the last 30 days of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=21 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=23 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hospice Use (Chart Review)
|
6 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 months after patient enrollmentSurvival rate for patients will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review at 4 months after enrollment.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 months after patient enrollmentSurvival rate for patients will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review at 12 months after enrollment.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Proportion of patients who strongly agreed the decisions about their health care were theirs to make at baseline (study enrollment).Population: 79 (98.8%) participants in the control group and 80 (100%) participants in the intervention group completed this survey at time of enrollment in the study (baseline).
The validated Satisfaction with Decision (SWD) Survey was administered to all participants at baseline. The SWD is a 6-item questionnaire, where respondents rate their agreement with 6 statements (e.g. "I am satisfied that I am adequately informed about the issues important to my decision") on a likert-type scale. Answer options were (1) Strongly Disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither Agree nor Disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly Agree. Responses to each item were averaged to give a score of 0 to 5 where 0 indicated lowest satisfaction and 5 indicated most satisfied with decision making. Results are expressed as a proportion of participants who responded "strongly agree" at Baseline on the Satisfaction with Decision scale, which measured ratings of decision-making.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Control Group
n=79 Participants
The control group arm participants receive usual care.
|
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
n=80 Participants
Patients randomized into the intervention are assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention, and also receive usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Decision-Making Using the Satisfaction With Decision Survey
|
41 Participants
|
38 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Usual Care Control Group
Lay Health Worker Intervention Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place