Trial Outcomes & Findings for Intranasal Neurostimulation in Ameliorating Symptoms of Neuropathic Corneal Pain (NCT NCT03674892)

NCT ID: NCT03674892

Last Updated: 2025-08-24

Results Overview

The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a 10 cm line, with one end labeled 'no pain' (which is equivalent to a score of 0 on the numerical scale) and the other end labeled 'worst pain imaginable' (which is equivalent to a score of 10 on the numerical scale). The patient is asked to mark the scale according to the intensity of their eye pain, and the examiner measures the distance in centimeters from the 'no pain' end of the line to score the VAS. The level of discomfort/pain before and after ITN was assessed using the VAS questionnaire (0-10). The changes in overall eye pain after ITN were recorded. Higher scores on the VAS indicate more intense pain and a worse outcome.

Recruitment status

TERMINATED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

21 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

immediately before and after ITN on Day 1 (baseline)

Results posted on

2025-08-24

Participant Flow

As outlined in the study protocol, this trial aimed to enroll 45 patients with neuropathic corneal pain and evaluate them at 45 and 90 days following daily use of the TrueTear™ device. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and related concerns about infection, only 21 patients enrolled in the study and completed the first visit. As this was a single arm study, all participants were assigned to the TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN) group.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Experimental: TrueTear™ Intranasal Neurostimulator (ITN)
The TrueTear® ITN, recently approved by the FDA, is a portable neuromodulation device that delivers a small electrical current to the sensory nerves in the nasal cavity that stimulates the nasolacrimal reflex (NLR).
Overall Study
STARTED
21
Overall Study
Month 1 Visit 3
12
Overall Study
COMPLETED
6
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
15

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Experimental: TrueTear™ Intranasal Neurostimulator (ITN)
The TrueTear® ITN, recently approved by the FDA, is a portable neuromodulation device that delivers a small electrical current to the sensory nerves in the nasal cavity that stimulates the nasolacrimal reflex (NLR).
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
5
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
3
Overall Study
Migraine
2
Overall Study
Excessive Tearing
1
Overall Study
Increased Eye Pain
1
Overall Study
Increased Facial Pain
1
Overall Study
Sinus Irritation
1
Overall Study
Sinus Infection
1

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
TrueTear™ Intranasal Neurostimulator (ITN)
n=21 Participants
TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN) TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN): TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
Age, Continuous
53.05 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.82 • n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants
n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 participants
n=21 Participants
Randomly Selected Eye for Analysis (Right eye/Left eye)
Right eye OD
11 Participants
n=21 Participants
Randomly Selected Eye for Analysis (Right eye/Left eye)
Left eye OS
10 Participants
n=21 Participants
Best Corrected Visual Acuity
0.09 logMAR
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.10 • n=21 Participants
Schirmer
8.71 millimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.00 • n=21 Participants
Tear Break Up Time
6.70 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.69 • n=21 Participants
Corneal Staining Score
2.56 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.03 • n=21 Participants
Conjunctival Staining Score
2.44 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.03 • n=21 Participants
Intraocular Pressure
13.76 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.22 • n=21 Participants
Proparacaine Challenge Test
Before
5.80 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.08 • n=21 Participants
Proparacaine Challenge Test
After
1.80 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.54 • n=21 Participants
Proparacaine Challenge Test Percent Change
-68.96 percentage change
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.12 • n=21 Participants
Cold Saline Test
Before
4.40 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.21 • n=21 Participants
Cold Saline Test
After
2.75 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.24 • n=21 Participants
Hypertonic Test
Before
3.30 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.79 • n=21 Participants
Hypertonic Test
After
5.25 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.53 • n=21 Participants
Neuropathic Corneal Pain Type
Peripheral
16 Participants
n=21 Participants
Neuropathic Corneal Pain Type
Mixed
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
Pain Intensity
Pre-stimulation
5.73 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.09 • n=21 Participants
Pain Intensity
Post-stimulation
1.92 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.67 • n=21 Participants
Pain Intensity
Difference
-3.81 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.88 • n=21 Participants
Pain Intensity Change Percent after Intranasal Neurostimulation
-66.49 percent change
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.38 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score
69.96 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.83 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Light Sensitivity
2.85 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.56 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Gritty
2.37 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.30 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Painful Eyes
3.30 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.86 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Blurred Eyes
2.30 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.49 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Poor Vision
2.26 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.36 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Reading
2.61 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.97 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Driving Night
2.50 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.54 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Working ATM/Computer
3.11 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.13 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Watching TV
2.94 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.01 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Windy Conditions
3.17 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.15 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Low Humidity
3.53 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.62 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Areas with Air Conditioner
3.64 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Overall Pain
5.50 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.42 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Most Eye Pain Intensity in the past 24 hours
7.87 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.99 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Least Eye Pain Intensity in the past 24 hours
3.21 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.10 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Average Eye Pain Intensity in the past 24 hours
5.75 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.96 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Most Eye Pain Intensity in the past 2 weeks
7.82 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.02 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Least Eye Pain Intensity in the past 2 weeks
4.00 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.29 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Average Eye Pain Intensity in the past 2 weeks
5.65 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.96 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Non-Eye Pain in the past 24 hours
4.68 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.64 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Non-Eye Pain in the past 2 weeks
5.42 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.92 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS)
46.68 The percentage of time (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.90 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Quality of Life Parameters
Reading
7.37 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.88 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Quality of Life Parameters
Driving
6.50 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.31 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Quality of Life Parameters
General activity (walking, doing house chores)
5.52 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.31 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Quality of Life Parameters
Mood
7.00 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.45 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Quality of Life Parameters
Sleep
4.55 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.28 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Quality of Life Parameters
Enjoying Life/ Relations with other people
6.65 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.26 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Quality of Life Parameters
74.12 The percentage of time (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.90 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Average Quality of Life (QoL) Score:
6.46 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.48 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Aggravating Factors
Wind, dry air, heat, air conditioning
79.72 percent (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.47 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Aggravating Factors
Volatile chemicals (cleaning agents, fumes, cosmetic)
65.00 percent (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.17 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Associated Factors
Redness
50.26 percent (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.74 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Associated Factors
Burning
73.00 percent (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.15 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Associated Factors
Sensitivity to light
75.25 percent (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.65 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Associated Factors
Tearing
38.95 percent (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.99 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Symptom Relief
Eye Pain
33.63 percent (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.03 • n=21 Participants
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Symptom Relief
Non-Eye Pain (face/head)
23.75 percent (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.61 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Doing close work in the morning or afternoon
2.60 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.59 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Doing close work in the evening or at night
2.73 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.43 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Driving
3.35 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.64 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Being around and/or using scented products
3.21 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.96 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Working on a computer
2.46 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.68 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Going somewhere where there is tobacco smoke
2.40 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.91 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Wearing contact lenses
3.92 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.05 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Wearing make-up
2.57 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.86 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Flying on an airplane
3.53 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.71 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Irritability
1.73 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.03 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Impatience
2.13 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.12 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling sad
1.80 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.20 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Worry that my dry eyes will get worse
1.33 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.32 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling annoyed
1.93 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.22 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling like my eyes do not look nice
1.66 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.44 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling like I have to make adjustments to my life
1.06 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.12 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling different from other people
1.66 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.63 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling like I am always aware of my eyes
0.80 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.08 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling older than I really am
2.00 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.64 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling like people look at me and think I am fine when I'm not
1.73 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.66 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling like there is nothing I can do for my dry eyes
1.26 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.38 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Work
Yes
10 Participants
n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Work
No
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Work
No answer
6 Participants
n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Situations at Work
Feeling distracted
1.64 IDEEL Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.00 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Situations at Work
Feeling like I couldn't concentrate
1.71 IDEEL Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.06 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Situations at Work
Having to take a break from work
1.38 IDEEL Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.12 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Situations at Work
Having to change the way I work
1.28 IDEEL Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.26 • n=21 Participants
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Situations at Work
Having to change my work environment
1.28 IDEEL Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.58 • n=21 Participants
Filter Glasses Test
78.00 Units on a scale (0-100)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.36 • n=21 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: immediately before and after ITN on Day 1 (baseline)

Population: Post-stimulation minus pre-stimulation pain scores of all patients who underwent intranasal neurostimulation at the 1-day (baseline) visit.

The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a 10 cm line, with one end labeled 'no pain' (which is equivalent to a score of 0 on the numerical scale) and the other end labeled 'worst pain imaginable' (which is equivalent to a score of 10 on the numerical scale). The patient is asked to mark the scale according to the intensity of their eye pain, and the examiner measures the distance in centimeters from the 'no pain' end of the line to score the VAS. The level of discomfort/pain before and after ITN was assessed using the VAS questionnaire (0-10). The changes in overall eye pain after ITN were recorded. Higher scores on the VAS indicate more intense pain and a worse outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=21 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
Change to Overall Pain by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) After Intranasal Neurostimulator (ITN) Stimulation at Baseline
-3.81 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.41

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: immediately before and after ITN on Day 45

Population: Post-stimulation minus pre-stimulation pain scores of all patients who underwent intranasal neurostimulation at the 45-day visit.

The VAS is a 10 cm line, with one end labeled 'no pain' (which is equivalent to a score of 0 on the numerical scale) and the other end labeled 'worst pain imaginable' (which is equivalent to a score of 10 on the numerical scale). The patient is asked to mark the scale according to the intensity of their eye pain, and the examiner measures the distance in centimeters or millimeters from the 'no pain' end of the line to score the VAS. The level of discomfort/pain before and after ITN was assessed using the VAS questionnaire (0-10). The changes in overall eye pain after ITN were recorded. Higher scores on the VAS indicate more intense pain and a worse outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=12 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
Change to Overall Pain by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) After Daily Intranasal Neurostimulator (ITN) Stimulation Over 45-day Period
-1.58 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.39

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: immediately before and after ITN on Day 90

Population: Post-stimulation minus pre-stimulation pain scores of all patients who underwent intranasal neurostimulation at the 90-day visit.

The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a 10 cm line, with one end labeled 'no pain' (which is equivalent to a score of 0 on the numerical scale) and the other end labeled 'worst pain imaginable' (which is equivalent to a score of 10 on the numerical scale). The patient is asked to mark the scale according to the intensity of their eye pain, and the examiner measures the distance in centimeters or millimeters from the 'no pain' end of the line to score the VAS. The level of discomfort/pain before and after ITN was assessed using the VAS questionnaire (0-10). The changes in overall eye pain after ITN were recorded. Higher scores on the VAS indicate more intense pain and a worse outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=6 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
Change to Overall Pain by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) After Daily Intranasal Neurostimulator (ITN) Stimulation Over 90-day Period
-0.75 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.83

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline)

Population: All Patients Participated 1 Day (Baseline) Visit

The Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) is a multidimensional questionnaire that assesses eye pain, non-eye pain, quality of life (QoL), aggravating factors, and associated factors. The QoL section evaluates seven dimensions, with the first six graded using numerical rating scales (0-10) and the final question expressed as a percentage (0-100). Higher scores indicate severe pain and lower QoL in the QoL section of OPAS questionnaire. Ranges: 0-10 for the "Reading and/or computer use", "Driving and/or watching TV", "General Activity", "Mood", "Sleep", "Enjoying Life/ Relationship. "Time spent thinking about pain" dimensions and 0-100. Higher scores indicate worse QoL.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=21 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
Quality of Life as Measured With OPAS at Baseline
Reading and/or computer use
7.37 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.64
Quality of Life as Measured With OPAS at Baseline
Driving and/or watching tv
6.50 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.78
Quality of Life as Measured With OPAS at Baseline
Sleep
4.55 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.77
Quality of Life as Measured With OPAS at Baseline
Enjoying Life/Relationship
6.65 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.73
Quality of Life as Measured With OPAS at Baseline
Time spent thinking about pain
74.12 score on a scale
Standard Error 6.76
Quality of Life as Measured With OPAS at Baseline
General activity
5.52 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.75
Quality of Life as Measured With OPAS at Baseline
Mood
7.00 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.54

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 45 days

Population: All Patients Participated 45 Day Visit

The Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) is a multidimensional questionnaire that assesses eye pain, non-eye pain, quality of life (QoL), aggravating factors, and associated factors. The QoL section evaluates seven dimensions, with the first six graded using numerical rating scales (0-10) and the final question expressed as a percentage (0-100). Higher scores indicate severe pain and lower QoL in the QoL section of OPAS questionnaire. Ranges: 0-10 for the "Reading and/or computer use", "Driving and/or watching TV", "General Activity", "Mood", "Sleep", "Enjoying Life/ Relationship. "Time spent thinking about pain" dimensions and 0-100. Higher scores indicate worse QoL.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=12 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 45 Days
General Activity
4.03 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.80
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 45 Days
Mood
5.42 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.74
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 45 Days
Sleep
3.64 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.90
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 45 Days
Enjoying Life/ Relationship
4.89 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.70
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 45 Days
Time spent thinking about pain
59.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 8.91
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 45 Days
Reading and/or computer use
5.50 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.85
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 45 Days
Driving and/or watching TV
5.03 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.96

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 90 days

Population: All Patients Participated 90 Day Visit

The Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) is a multidimensional questionnaire that assesses eye pain, non-eye pain, quality of life (QoL), aggravating factors, and associated factors. The QoL section evaluates seven dimensions, with the first six graded using numerical rating scales (0-10) and the final question expressed as a percentage (0-100). Higher scores indicate severe pain and lower QoL in the QoL section of OPAS questionnaire. Ranges: 0-10 for the "Reading and/or computer use", "Driving and/or watching TV", "General Activity", "Mood", "Sleep", "Enjoying Life/ Relationship. "Time spent thinking about pain" dimensions and 0-100. Higher scores indicate worse QoL.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=6 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 90 Days
Reading and/or computer use
4.80 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.82
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 90 Days
Driving and/or watching TV
5.00 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.92
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 90 Days
General activity
2.50 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.89
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 90 Days
Mood
4.40 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.37
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 90 Days
Enjoying Life/ Relationship
4.30 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.57
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 90 Days
Time spent thinking about pain
53.31 score on a scale
Standard Error 26.01
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 90 Days
Sleep
2.00 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.37

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline vs day 45 visit and Baseline vs day 90 visit

Population: Patients participated INSTANT study visits

The Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) is a multidimensional questionnaire that assesses eye pain, non-eye pain, quality of life (QoL), aggravating factors, and associated factors. The QoL section evaluates seven dimensions, with the first six graded using numerical rating scales (0-10) and the final question expressed as a percentage (0-100). Higher scores indicate severe pain and lower QoL in the QoL section of OPAS questionnaire. Percentage changes in the scores between baseline vs 45-day visit and baseline vs 90-day visit after daily intranasal neurostimulation are given below.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=12 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
n=6 Participants
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
Overall Change in Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS
Reading and/or computer use
-25.37 percent change
Standard Error 11.39
-34.87 percent change
Standard Error 17.72
Overall Change in Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS
Driving and/or watching TV
-22.61 percent change
Standard Error 11.97
-23.07 percent change
Standard Error 19.32
Overall Change in Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS
General Activity
-26.99 percent change
Standard Error 30.92
-54.71 percent change
Standard Error 15.02
Overall Change in Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS
Mood
-22.57 percent change
Standard Error 9.20
-37.14 percent change
Standard Error 10.84
Overall Change in Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS
Sleep
-23.95 percent change
Standard Error 30.32
-56.04 percent change
Standard Error 40.44
Overall Change in Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS
Enjoying life/ Relationship
-26.46 percent change
Standard Error 13.94
-35.33 percent change
Standard Error 26.20
Overall Change in Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS
Time spent thinking about pain
-19.56 percent change
Standard Error 34.50
-28.07 percent change
Standard Error 25.72

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline vs day 45 visit and Baseline vs day 90 visit

Population: Patients participated INSTANT study visits

The Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) is a multidimensional questionnaire that assesses eye pain, non-eye pain, quality of life (QoL), aggravating factors, and associated factors. Eye pain intensity was assessed using a numerical scale (0-10) for the most, least, and average pain in the past 24 hours and 2 weeks. Higher scores indicate severe pain of OPAS questionnaire. The percent changes in pain intensity between baseline vs 45-day and baseline vs 90-day are provided below.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=12 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
n=6 Participants
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
Percent Change From Pain Level Dimension Questions of the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS)
Most eye pain in 24 hours
-31.76 percent change
Standard Error 18.76
-54.25 percent change
Standard Error 20.55
Percent Change From Pain Level Dimension Questions of the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS)
Least eye pain in 24 hours
-12.14 percent change
Standard Error 22.67
-37.69 percent change
Standard Error 25.46
Percent Change From Pain Level Dimension Questions of the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS)
Average eye pain in 24 hours
-30.43 percent change
Standard Error 20.17
-46.08 percent change
Standard Error 21.35
Percent Change From Pain Level Dimension Questions of the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS)
Most eye pain in 2 weeks
-22.89 percent change
Standard Error 18.43
-43.73 percent change
Standard Error 16.57
Percent Change From Pain Level Dimension Questions of the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS)
Least eye pain in 2 weeks
-19.75 percent change
Standard Error 25.93
-37.50 percent change
Standard Error 26.93
Percent Change From Pain Level Dimension Questions of the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS)
Average eye pain in 2 weeks
-24.77 percent change
Standard Error 22.18
-46.90 percent change
Standard Error 20.85

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline vs day 45 visit and Baseline vs day 90 visit

Population: All patients participated INSTANT visits.

IDEEL Quality of Life Questionnaire is a 27-item questionnaire, designed specifically for DED and is divided into three parts. It assesses the quality of life in three aspects of life for the previous 2 weeks: daily activities, work and feelings. The quality of life is assessed on a scale of 0-5, with zero being inability to do the activity. The score is calculated between 0 - 100 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. Percentage change in IDEEL questionnaire subheading between baseline and day 45 and baseline and day 90 were given below.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=12 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
n=6 Participants
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
Overall Percent Change on Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL)
Daily Activities
16.14 percent change
Standard Error 23.72
21.83 percent change
Standard Error 17.93
Overall Percent Change on Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL)
Feelings
17.06 percent change
Standard Error 17.38
40.73 percent change
Standard Error 38.43
Overall Percent Change on Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL)
Work
46.91 percent change
Standard Error 17.82
48.80 percent change
Standard Error 40.45

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline vs day 45 visit and Baseline vs day 90 visit

Population: Patients participated INSTANT study visits.

Intraocular pressure will be measured by an applanation tonometer used on slit lamp (Goldmann) in mmHg. Change in IOP values between baseline and 90-day is provided below. A healthy eye pressure is between 10 and 21 millimeters of mercury. The differences in intraocular pressure between the baseline and day 45 visits, as well as between the baseline and day 90 visits, are presented below.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=12 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
n=6 Participants
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
Change in the Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Measured in Each Visit.
-0.18 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 1.10
-0.43 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 0.92

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 90 days

Population: All patients who underwent intranasal neurostimulation were evaluated for safety measures.

For safety analyses during the study, patient-reported adverse events that developed after intranasal neurostimulation were recorded.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=21 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety)
Migraine Attacks
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety)
Increased Eye Pain
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety)
Increased Facial Pain
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety)
Sinus Irritation and Pain
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety)
Sinus Infection
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety)
Excessive Tearing
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety)
Pain in the nose
2 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 90 days

Population: All patients who underwent intranasal neurostimulation and completed Ocular Tolerability and Compliance Questionnaire.

Tolerability of Intranasal Neurostimulator (ITN) was evaluated by using Ocular Tolerability and Compliance Questionnaire. It assesses symptoms of discomfort in each eye after ITN use.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=21 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Tolerability)
Forehead Throbbing
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Tolerability)
Eye Itching
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Tolerability)
Burning sensation
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Tolerability)
Foreign Body Sensation
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Tolerability)
Sneezing
2 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline vs 45 Day Visit and baseline vs 90 Day Visit

Population: INSTANT patients participated baseline-45 Day Visit and baseline-90 Day Visit

After daily intranasal neurostimulation, the change in the number of systemic pain medication between baseline vs 45-day visit and Baseline vs 90-day visit was evaluated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=12 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
n=6 Participants
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
Reduction on Other Concomitant Pain Therapy
0.14 Number of medication (n)
Standard Error 0.08
-0.25 Number of medication (n)
Standard Error 0.25

Adverse Events

All Patients

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 13 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
All Patients
n=21 participants at risk
All patients participated in this study
Eye disorders
Excessive tearing
4.8%
1/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
Eye disorders
Burning Sensation on Eye
14.3%
3/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
Eye disorders
Foreign Body Sensation on Eye
9.5%
2/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
Eye disorders
Increased Eye Pain
4.8%
1/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
Eye disorders
Eye Itching
9.5%
2/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
Nervous system disorders
Forehead throbbing
4.8%
1/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
Nervous system disorders
Migraine Attacks
9.5%
2/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
Nervous system disorders
Increased Facial Pain
4.8%
1/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
General disorders
Pain in the nose
9.5%
2/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
General disorders
Sinus irritation and Pain
4.8%
1/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
General disorders
Sinus infection
4.8%
1/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
General disorders
Sneezing
9.5%
2/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.

Additional Information

Pedram Hamrah, MD

Tufts Medical Center

Phone: 617-636-5720

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place