Trial Outcomes & Findings for Intranasal Neurostimulation in Ameliorating Symptoms of Neuropathic Corneal Pain (NCT NCT03674892)
NCT ID: NCT03674892
Last Updated: 2025-08-24
Results Overview
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a 10 cm line, with one end labeled 'no pain' (which is equivalent to a score of 0 on the numerical scale) and the other end labeled 'worst pain imaginable' (which is equivalent to a score of 10 on the numerical scale). The patient is asked to mark the scale according to the intensity of their eye pain, and the examiner measures the distance in centimeters from the 'no pain' end of the line to score the VAS. The level of discomfort/pain before and after ITN was assessed using the VAS questionnaire (0-10). The changes in overall eye pain after ITN were recorded. Higher scores on the VAS indicate more intense pain and a worse outcome.
TERMINATED
NA
21 participants
immediately before and after ITN on Day 1 (baseline)
2025-08-24
Participant Flow
As outlined in the study protocol, this trial aimed to enroll 45 patients with neuropathic corneal pain and evaluate them at 45 and 90 days following daily use of the TrueTear™ device. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and related concerns about infection, only 21 patients enrolled in the study and completed the first visit. As this was a single arm study, all participants were assigned to the TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN) group.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Experimental: TrueTear™ Intranasal Neurostimulator (ITN)
The TrueTear® ITN, recently approved by the FDA, is a portable neuromodulation device that delivers a small electrical current to the sensory nerves in the nasal cavity that stimulates the nasolacrimal reflex (NLR).
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
Month 1 Visit 3
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
15
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Experimental: TrueTear™ Intranasal Neurostimulator (ITN)
The TrueTear® ITN, recently approved by the FDA, is a portable neuromodulation device that delivers a small electrical current to the sensory nerves in the nasal cavity that stimulates the nasolacrimal reflex (NLR).
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Migraine
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Excessive Tearing
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Increased Eye Pain
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Increased Facial Pain
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Sinus Irritation
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Sinus Infection
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
TrueTear™ Intranasal Neurostimulator (ITN)
n=21 Participants
TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN): TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
53.05 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.82 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
18 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
21 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Randomly Selected Eye for Analysis (Right eye/Left eye)
Right eye OD
|
11 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Randomly Selected Eye for Analysis (Right eye/Left eye)
Left eye OS
|
10 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity
|
0.09 logMAR
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.10 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Schirmer
|
8.71 millimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.00 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Tear Break Up Time
|
6.70 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.69 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Corneal Staining Score
|
2.56 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.03 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Conjunctival Staining Score
|
2.44 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.03 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Intraocular Pressure
|
13.76 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.22 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Proparacaine Challenge Test
Before
|
5.80 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.08 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Proparacaine Challenge Test
After
|
1.80 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.54 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Proparacaine Challenge Test Percent Change
|
-68.96 percentage change
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.12 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Cold Saline Test
Before
|
4.40 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.21 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Cold Saline Test
After
|
2.75 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.24 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Hypertonic Test
Before
|
3.30 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.79 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Hypertonic Test
After
|
5.25 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.53 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Neuropathic Corneal Pain Type
Peripheral
|
16 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Neuropathic Corneal Pain Type
Mixed
|
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Pain Intensity
Pre-stimulation
|
5.73 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.09 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Pain Intensity
Post-stimulation
|
1.92 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.67 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Pain Intensity
Difference
|
-3.81 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.88 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Pain Intensity Change Percent after Intranasal Neurostimulation
|
-66.49 percent change
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.38 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score
|
69.96 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.83 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Light Sensitivity
|
2.85 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.56 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Gritty
|
2.37 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.30 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Painful Eyes
|
3.30 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.86 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Blurred Eyes
|
2.30 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.49 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Poor Vision
|
2.26 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.36 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Reading
|
2.61 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.97 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Driving Night
|
2.50 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.54 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Working ATM/Computer
|
3.11 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.13 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Watching TV
|
2.94 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.01 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Windy Conditions
|
3.17 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.15 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Low Humidity
|
3.53 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.62 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Dimensions
Areas with Air Conditioner
|
3.64 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Overall Pain
|
5.50 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.42 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Most Eye Pain Intensity in the past 24 hours
|
7.87 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.99 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Least Eye Pain Intensity in the past 24 hours
|
3.21 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.10 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Average Eye Pain Intensity in the past 24 hours
|
5.75 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.96 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Most Eye Pain Intensity in the past 2 weeks
|
7.82 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.02 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Least Eye Pain Intensity in the past 2 weeks
|
4.00 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.29 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Average Eye Pain Intensity in the past 2 weeks
|
5.65 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.96 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Non-Eye Pain in the past 24 hours
|
4.68 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.64 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Dimensions
Non-Eye Pain in the past 2 weeks
|
5.42 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.92 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS)
|
46.68 The percentage of time (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.90 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Quality of Life Parameters
Reading
|
7.37 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.88 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Quality of Life Parameters
Driving
|
6.50 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.31 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Quality of Life Parameters
General activity (walking, doing house chores)
|
5.52 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.31 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Quality of Life Parameters
Mood
|
7.00 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.45 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Quality of Life Parameters
Sleep
|
4.55 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.28 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Quality of Life Parameters
Enjoying Life/ Relations with other people
|
6.65 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.26 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Quality of Life Parameters
|
74.12 The percentage of time (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.90 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Average Quality of Life (QoL) Score:
|
6.46 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.48 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Aggravating Factors
Wind, dry air, heat, air conditioning
|
79.72 percent (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.47 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Aggravating Factors
Volatile chemicals (cleaning agents, fumes, cosmetic)
|
65.00 percent (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.17 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Associated Factors
Redness
|
50.26 percent (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.74 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Associated Factors
Burning
|
73.00 percent (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.15 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Associated Factors
Sensitivity to light
|
75.25 percent (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.65 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Associated Factors
Tearing
|
38.95 percent (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.99 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Symptom Relief
Eye Pain
|
33.63 percent (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.03 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) Symptom Relief
Non-Eye Pain (face/head)
|
23.75 percent (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.61 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Doing close work in the morning or afternoon
|
2.60 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.59 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Doing close work in the evening or at night
|
2.73 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.43 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Driving
|
3.35 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.64 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Being around and/or using scented products
|
3.21 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.96 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Working on a computer
|
2.46 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.68 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Going somewhere where there is tobacco smoke
|
2.40 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.91 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Wearing contact lenses
|
3.92 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.05 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Wearing make-up
|
2.57 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.86 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Daily Activities
Flying on an airplane
|
3.53 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.71 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Irritability
|
1.73 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.03 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Impatience
|
2.13 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.12 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling sad
|
1.80 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.20 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Worry that my dry eyes will get worse
|
1.33 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.32 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling annoyed
|
1.93 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.22 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling like my eyes do not look nice
|
1.66 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.44 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling like I have to make adjustments to my life
|
1.06 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.12 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling different from other people
|
1.66 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.63 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling like I am always aware of my eyes
|
0.80 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.08 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling older than I really am
|
2.00 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.64 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling like people look at me and think I am fine when I'm not
|
1.73 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.66 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Feelings
Feeling like there is nothing I can do for my dry eyes
|
1.26 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.38 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Work
Yes
|
10 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Work
No
|
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Work
No answer
|
6 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Situations at Work
Feeling distracted
|
1.64 IDEEL Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.00 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Situations at Work
Feeling like I couldn't concentrate
|
1.71 IDEEL Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.06 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Situations at Work
Having to take a break from work
|
1.38 IDEEL Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.12 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Situations at Work
Having to change the way I work
|
1.28 IDEEL Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.26 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL) Situations at Work
Having to change my work environment
|
1.28 IDEEL Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.58 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Filter Glasses Test
|
78.00 Units on a scale (0-100)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.36 • n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: immediately before and after ITN on Day 1 (baseline)Population: Post-stimulation minus pre-stimulation pain scores of all patients who underwent intranasal neurostimulation at the 1-day (baseline) visit.
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a 10 cm line, with one end labeled 'no pain' (which is equivalent to a score of 0 on the numerical scale) and the other end labeled 'worst pain imaginable' (which is equivalent to a score of 10 on the numerical scale). The patient is asked to mark the scale according to the intensity of their eye pain, and the examiner measures the distance in centimeters from the 'no pain' end of the line to score the VAS. The level of discomfort/pain before and after ITN was assessed using the VAS questionnaire (0-10). The changes in overall eye pain after ITN were recorded. Higher scores on the VAS indicate more intense pain and a worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=21 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit
ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
|
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN
ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change to Overall Pain by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) After Intranasal Neurostimulator (ITN) Stimulation at Baseline
|
-3.81 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.41
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: immediately before and after ITN on Day 45Population: Post-stimulation minus pre-stimulation pain scores of all patients who underwent intranasal neurostimulation at the 45-day visit.
The VAS is a 10 cm line, with one end labeled 'no pain' (which is equivalent to a score of 0 on the numerical scale) and the other end labeled 'worst pain imaginable' (which is equivalent to a score of 10 on the numerical scale). The patient is asked to mark the scale according to the intensity of their eye pain, and the examiner measures the distance in centimeters or millimeters from the 'no pain' end of the line to score the VAS. The level of discomfort/pain before and after ITN was assessed using the VAS questionnaire (0-10). The changes in overall eye pain after ITN were recorded. Higher scores on the VAS indicate more intense pain and a worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=12 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit
ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
|
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN
ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change to Overall Pain by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) After Daily Intranasal Neurostimulator (ITN) Stimulation Over 45-day Period
|
-1.58 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.39
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: immediately before and after ITN on Day 90Population: Post-stimulation minus pre-stimulation pain scores of all patients who underwent intranasal neurostimulation at the 90-day visit.
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a 10 cm line, with one end labeled 'no pain' (which is equivalent to a score of 0 on the numerical scale) and the other end labeled 'worst pain imaginable' (which is equivalent to a score of 10 on the numerical scale). The patient is asked to mark the scale according to the intensity of their eye pain, and the examiner measures the distance in centimeters or millimeters from the 'no pain' end of the line to score the VAS. The level of discomfort/pain before and after ITN was assessed using the VAS questionnaire (0-10). The changes in overall eye pain after ITN were recorded. Higher scores on the VAS indicate more intense pain and a worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=6 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit
ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
|
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN
ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change to Overall Pain by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) After Daily Intranasal Neurostimulator (ITN) Stimulation Over 90-day Period
|
-0.75 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.83
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline)Population: All Patients Participated 1 Day (Baseline) Visit
The Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) is a multidimensional questionnaire that assesses eye pain, non-eye pain, quality of life (QoL), aggravating factors, and associated factors. The QoL section evaluates seven dimensions, with the first six graded using numerical rating scales (0-10) and the final question expressed as a percentage (0-100). Higher scores indicate severe pain and lower QoL in the QoL section of OPAS questionnaire. Ranges: 0-10 for the "Reading and/or computer use", "Driving and/or watching TV", "General Activity", "Mood", "Sleep", "Enjoying Life/ Relationship. "Time spent thinking about pain" dimensions and 0-100. Higher scores indicate worse QoL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=21 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit
ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
|
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN
ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With OPAS at Baseline
Reading and/or computer use
|
7.37 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.64
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With OPAS at Baseline
Driving and/or watching tv
|
6.50 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.78
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With OPAS at Baseline
Sleep
|
4.55 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.77
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With OPAS at Baseline
Enjoying Life/Relationship
|
6.65 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.73
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With OPAS at Baseline
Time spent thinking about pain
|
74.12 score on a scale
Standard Error 6.76
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With OPAS at Baseline
General activity
|
5.52 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.75
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With OPAS at Baseline
Mood
|
7.00 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.54
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 45 daysPopulation: All Patients Participated 45 Day Visit
The Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) is a multidimensional questionnaire that assesses eye pain, non-eye pain, quality of life (QoL), aggravating factors, and associated factors. The QoL section evaluates seven dimensions, with the first six graded using numerical rating scales (0-10) and the final question expressed as a percentage (0-100). Higher scores indicate severe pain and lower QoL in the QoL section of OPAS questionnaire. Ranges: 0-10 for the "Reading and/or computer use", "Driving and/or watching TV", "General Activity", "Mood", "Sleep", "Enjoying Life/ Relationship. "Time spent thinking about pain" dimensions and 0-100. Higher scores indicate worse QoL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=12 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit
ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
|
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN
ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 45 Days
General Activity
|
4.03 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.80
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 45 Days
Mood
|
5.42 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.74
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 45 Days
Sleep
|
3.64 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.90
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 45 Days
Enjoying Life/ Relationship
|
4.89 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.70
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 45 Days
Time spent thinking about pain
|
59.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 8.91
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 45 Days
Reading and/or computer use
|
5.50 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.85
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 45 Days
Driving and/or watching TV
|
5.03 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.96
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 90 daysPopulation: All Patients Participated 90 Day Visit
The Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) is a multidimensional questionnaire that assesses eye pain, non-eye pain, quality of life (QoL), aggravating factors, and associated factors. The QoL section evaluates seven dimensions, with the first six graded using numerical rating scales (0-10) and the final question expressed as a percentage (0-100). Higher scores indicate severe pain and lower QoL in the QoL section of OPAS questionnaire. Ranges: 0-10 for the "Reading and/or computer use", "Driving and/or watching TV", "General Activity", "Mood", "Sleep", "Enjoying Life/ Relationship. "Time spent thinking about pain" dimensions and 0-100. Higher scores indicate worse QoL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=6 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit
ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
|
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN
ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 90 Days
Reading and/or computer use
|
4.80 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.82
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 90 Days
Driving and/or watching TV
|
5.00 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.92
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 90 Days
General activity
|
2.50 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.89
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 90 Days
Mood
|
4.40 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.37
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 90 Days
Enjoying Life/ Relationship
|
4.30 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.57
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 90 Days
Time spent thinking about pain
|
53.31 score on a scale
Standard Error 26.01
|
—
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 90 Days
Sleep
|
2.00 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.37
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline vs day 45 visit and Baseline vs day 90 visitPopulation: Patients participated INSTANT study visits
The Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) is a multidimensional questionnaire that assesses eye pain, non-eye pain, quality of life (QoL), aggravating factors, and associated factors. The QoL section evaluates seven dimensions, with the first six graded using numerical rating scales (0-10) and the final question expressed as a percentage (0-100). Higher scores indicate severe pain and lower QoL in the QoL section of OPAS questionnaire. Percentage changes in the scores between baseline vs 45-day visit and baseline vs 90-day visit after daily intranasal neurostimulation are given below.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=12 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit
ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
|
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
n=6 Participants
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN
ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Change in Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS
Reading and/or computer use
|
-25.37 percent change
Standard Error 11.39
|
-34.87 percent change
Standard Error 17.72
|
|
Overall Change in Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS
Driving and/or watching TV
|
-22.61 percent change
Standard Error 11.97
|
-23.07 percent change
Standard Error 19.32
|
|
Overall Change in Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS
General Activity
|
-26.99 percent change
Standard Error 30.92
|
-54.71 percent change
Standard Error 15.02
|
|
Overall Change in Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS
Mood
|
-22.57 percent change
Standard Error 9.20
|
-37.14 percent change
Standard Error 10.84
|
|
Overall Change in Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS
Sleep
|
-23.95 percent change
Standard Error 30.32
|
-56.04 percent change
Standard Error 40.44
|
|
Overall Change in Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS
Enjoying life/ Relationship
|
-26.46 percent change
Standard Error 13.94
|
-35.33 percent change
Standard Error 26.20
|
|
Overall Change in Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS
Time spent thinking about pain
|
-19.56 percent change
Standard Error 34.50
|
-28.07 percent change
Standard Error 25.72
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline vs day 45 visit and Baseline vs day 90 visitPopulation: Patients participated INSTANT study visits
The Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) is a multidimensional questionnaire that assesses eye pain, non-eye pain, quality of life (QoL), aggravating factors, and associated factors. Eye pain intensity was assessed using a numerical scale (0-10) for the most, least, and average pain in the past 24 hours and 2 weeks. Higher scores indicate severe pain of OPAS questionnaire. The percent changes in pain intensity between baseline vs 45-day and baseline vs 90-day are provided below.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=12 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit
ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
|
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
n=6 Participants
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN
ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Pain Level Dimension Questions of the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS)
Most eye pain in 24 hours
|
-31.76 percent change
Standard Error 18.76
|
-54.25 percent change
Standard Error 20.55
|
|
Percent Change From Pain Level Dimension Questions of the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS)
Least eye pain in 24 hours
|
-12.14 percent change
Standard Error 22.67
|
-37.69 percent change
Standard Error 25.46
|
|
Percent Change From Pain Level Dimension Questions of the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS)
Average eye pain in 24 hours
|
-30.43 percent change
Standard Error 20.17
|
-46.08 percent change
Standard Error 21.35
|
|
Percent Change From Pain Level Dimension Questions of the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS)
Most eye pain in 2 weeks
|
-22.89 percent change
Standard Error 18.43
|
-43.73 percent change
Standard Error 16.57
|
|
Percent Change From Pain Level Dimension Questions of the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS)
Least eye pain in 2 weeks
|
-19.75 percent change
Standard Error 25.93
|
-37.50 percent change
Standard Error 26.93
|
|
Percent Change From Pain Level Dimension Questions of the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS)
Average eye pain in 2 weeks
|
-24.77 percent change
Standard Error 22.18
|
-46.90 percent change
Standard Error 20.85
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline vs day 45 visit and Baseline vs day 90 visitPopulation: All patients participated INSTANT visits.
IDEEL Quality of Life Questionnaire is a 27-item questionnaire, designed specifically for DED and is divided into three parts. It assesses the quality of life in three aspects of life for the previous 2 weeks: daily activities, work and feelings. The quality of life is assessed on a scale of 0-5, with zero being inability to do the activity. The score is calculated between 0 - 100 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. Percentage change in IDEEL questionnaire subheading between baseline and day 45 and baseline and day 90 were given below.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=12 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit
ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
|
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
n=6 Participants
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN
ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Percent Change on Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL)
Daily Activities
|
16.14 percent change
Standard Error 23.72
|
21.83 percent change
Standard Error 17.93
|
|
Overall Percent Change on Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL)
Feelings
|
17.06 percent change
Standard Error 17.38
|
40.73 percent change
Standard Error 38.43
|
|
Overall Percent Change on Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life (IDEEL)
Work
|
46.91 percent change
Standard Error 17.82
|
48.80 percent change
Standard Error 40.45
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline vs day 45 visit and Baseline vs day 90 visitPopulation: Patients participated INSTANT study visits.
Intraocular pressure will be measured by an applanation tonometer used on slit lamp (Goldmann) in mmHg. Change in IOP values between baseline and 90-day is provided below. A healthy eye pressure is between 10 and 21 millimeters of mercury. The differences in intraocular pressure between the baseline and day 45 visits, as well as between the baseline and day 90 visits, are presented below.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=12 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit
ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
|
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
n=6 Participants
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN
ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Measured in Each Visit.
|
-0.18 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 1.10
|
-0.43 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 0.92
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 90 daysPopulation: All patients who underwent intranasal neurostimulation were evaluated for safety measures.
For safety analyses during the study, patient-reported adverse events that developed after intranasal neurostimulation were recorded.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=21 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit
ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
|
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN
ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety)
Migraine Attacks
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety)
Increased Eye Pain
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety)
Increased Facial Pain
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety)
Sinus Irritation and Pain
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety)
Sinus Infection
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety)
Excessive Tearing
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety)
Pain in the nose
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 90 daysPopulation: All patients who underwent intranasal neurostimulation and completed Ocular Tolerability and Compliance Questionnaire.
Tolerability of Intranasal Neurostimulator (ITN) was evaluated by using Ocular Tolerability and Compliance Questionnaire. It assesses symptoms of discomfort in each eye after ITN use.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=21 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit
ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
|
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN
ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Tolerability)
Forehead Throbbing
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Tolerability)
Eye Itching
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Tolerability)
Burning sensation
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Tolerability)
Foreign Body Sensation
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Tolerability)
Sneezing
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline vs 45 Day Visit and baseline vs 90 Day VisitPopulation: INSTANT patients participated baseline-45 Day Visit and baseline-90 Day Visit
After daily intranasal neurostimulation, the change in the number of systemic pain medication between baseline vs 45-day visit and Baseline vs 90-day visit was evaluated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Patients Participated Baseline Visit
n=12 Participants
Difference of pain scores before and after ITNS at baseline visit
ITNS:Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
|
Baseline vs 90-day Visit
n=6 Participants
Percentage changes in the QoL scores between baseline and 90-day visit after daily ITN
ITN: Intranasal neurostimulation with TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator QoL: Quality of life dimensions in ocular pain assessment questionnaire
|
|---|---|---|
|
Reduction on Other Concomitant Pain Therapy
|
0.14 Number of medication (n)
Standard Error 0.08
|
-0.25 Number of medication (n)
Standard Error 0.25
|
Adverse Events
All Patients
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
All Patients
n=21 participants at risk
All patients participated in this study
|
|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Excessive tearing
|
4.8%
1/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
|
|
Eye disorders
Burning Sensation on Eye
|
14.3%
3/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
|
|
Eye disorders
Foreign Body Sensation on Eye
|
9.5%
2/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
|
|
Eye disorders
Increased Eye Pain
|
4.8%
1/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye Itching
|
9.5%
2/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Forehead throbbing
|
4.8%
1/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine Attacks
|
9.5%
2/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Increased Facial Pain
|
4.8%
1/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
|
|
General disorders
Pain in the nose
|
9.5%
2/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
|
|
General disorders
Sinus irritation and Pain
|
4.8%
1/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
|
|
General disorders
Sinus infection
|
4.8%
1/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
|
|
General disorders
Sneezing
|
9.5%
2/21 • 90 days
Adverse events were collected from patient diaries completed during daily intranasal neurostimulation, verbal reports provided by patients during clinical visits, and patient-completed Ocular Tolerability Questionnaire forms during clinical visits.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place