Trial Outcomes & Findings for Green Sun Medical Dynamic Scoliosis Brace (NCT NCT03641469)
NCT ID: NCT03641469
Last Updated: 2025-06-12
Results Overview
Acceptable GSM in-brace correction was defined as a difference of 10 degrees or less between the TLSO and GSM in-brace Cobb angles.
COMPLETED
NA
36 participants
Baseline (TLSO measurement) to GSM brace delivery (GSM measurement) within 60 days
2025-06-12
Participant Flow
36 patients with AIS were enrolled at 6 centers across the US. Recruitment opened May 2018 and continued until January 2024. Enrollment and study procedures were interrupted for several months by COVID in 2020.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Green Sun Dynamic Brace
TLSO at Baseline followed by GSM brace for 3 months
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
36
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
25
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Green Sun Dynamic Brace
TLSO at Baseline followed by GSM brace for 3 months
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Ineligible
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Green Sun Dynamic Brace
n=34 Participants
Eligible subjects treated with a TLSO at baseline
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
34 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
34 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
34 participants
n=34 Participants
|
|
Out-of-brace Cobb angle at Baseline
|
30.68 degrees
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.16 • n=28 Participants • Baseline Cobb angle measurements (from x-ray taken within 180 days prior to baseline) not available for 6 subjects
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (TLSO measurement) to GSM brace delivery (GSM measurement) within 60 daysPopulation: 24 subjects had x-rays in the TLSO and the GSM taken within a 60-day time frame.
Acceptable GSM in-brace correction was defined as a difference of 10 degrees or less between the TLSO and GSM in-brace Cobb angles.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Green Sun Dynamic Brace
n=24 Participants
Patients transitioned from current TLSO to GSM brace
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Acceptable GSM In-Brace Correction
|
100 Percentage acceptable GSM correction
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to ~3 mo Follow-upPopulation: 28 patients had baseline out-of-brace x-rays taken within 6 months of enrollment
Curve stability is defined as progression of 10 degrees or less between the Cobb angle at baseline and at follow-up after GSM wear (Baseline Cobb angle minus follow-up Cobb angle).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Green Sun Dynamic Brace
n=20 Participants
Patients transitioned from current TLSO to GSM brace
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Curve Stability or Progression at 3-month Follow-up
|
18 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 1 yearUnanticipated adverse events associated with the GSM brace and patient characteristics likely to raise safety issues
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Green Sun Dynamic Brace
n=34 Participants
Patients transitioned from current TLSO to GSM brace
|
|---|---|
|
Unanticipated Adverse Events
|
1 number of AE's reported
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Visit 3 (3-4 months post-baseline)Population: 14 subjects with both baseline and follow-up BrQ scores for analysis.
Change in Brace Questionnaire (BrQ) scores from baseline (reflecting experience with TLSO) to follow-up (reflecting experience with GSM brace). Total scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores suggesting better quality-of-life during bracing. A positive change score suggests increased brace-related QOL related to exposure to the GSM brace.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Green Sun Dynamic Brace
n=14 Participants
Patients transitioned from current TLSO to GSM brace
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Brace-related Quality of Life Scores (Brace Questionnaire)
|
3.82 Units on the scale
Interval -17.37 to 21.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Visit 3 (3-4 months post-baseline)Population: 12 subjects had baseline and follow-up ISYQOL scores for analysis
Change in scores on the Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life (ISYQOL) measure from baseline (reflecting experience with TLSO) to follow-up (reflecting experience with GSM brace). The total scores range from 0 to 100% where 100% indicates no problems related to spine or bracing issues. A positive change score suggests increased QOL related to exposure to the GSM brace.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Green Sun Dynamic Brace
n=12 Participants
Patients transitioned from current TLSO to GSM brace
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Quality of Life Scores
|
5.36 change in percentage QOL
Interval -19.02 to 18.55
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Participants tested prior to March 2020, after which spirometry testing was stopped due to COVID
Lung vital capacity measured in the TLSO and in the GSM brace to estimate chest wall movement difference. Positive difference favors GSM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Green Sun Dynamic Brace
n=16 Participants
Patients transitioned from current TLSO to GSM brace
|
|---|---|
|
Difference in Vital Capacity Measured in TLSO and GSM Brace
|
82.81 milliliters
Standard Deviation 470.80
|
Adverse Events
Green Sun Dynamic Brace
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Green Sun Dynamic Brace
n=34 participants at risk
Use of the Green Sun Dynamic Brace
|
|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pressure point of skin related to device
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • Up to 1 year
Any untoward or unfavorable medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the participant's participation in the research, whether or not considered related to the participant's participation in the research. Teams were asked to continuously surveil for AE's during study visits and phone contacts; all AE's were to be reported using a standard case report form. AE's prior to switch to GSM brace at baseline were not recorded.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Agreements are not uniform across the sites. The most restrictive agreement states that the site PI and sponsor agree present results only together with the other clinical study sites unless specific written permission is obtained in advance from Sponsor up to 1 year post-completion. After that, the PI can publish/present independently if Sponsor is given the opportunity to review and comment prior to dissemination.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER