Trial Outcomes & Findings for Percutaneous Microelectrolysis on Myofascial Trigger Points Pain. (NCT NCT03636386)

NCT ID: NCT03636386

Last Updated: 2023-04-18

Results Overview

Pain Intensity expressed in kilograms per square centimeter(kg/cm2) reported by participants when performing algometry test at sensitive point of upper trapezius muscle. PPT was valued in four occasions: PPT1 pre (baseline), PPT1 post, PPT 2 (at day 3) and PPT 3 (at day 7). PPT will be evaluated through the BASELINE® pressure algometer.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

48 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

PPTpre1 (baseline), PPTpost1 (post baseline), PPT2 (Day 3), PPT3 (Day 7), assessed an average of 30 minutes at each session

Results posted on

2023-04-18

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Percutaneous Microelectrolysis Group (MEP)
Group exposed to direct current application using an acupuncture needle with intensities in microamps (μA) in MTrP of upper trapezius muscle. Acupuncture needle correspond to negative electrode or cathode. This group was also be treated with conventional ultrasound (US) before MEP application. US treatments parameters will include; 1MHz, 1.5W/cm2, 5cm2 ERA, 100% duty cycle and 15 minutes treatment time. Percutaneous microelectrolysis: 284/5000 Application of Direct Current through an acupuncture needle with intensities in microamps (μA) in the PGm of the upper trapezius muscle. The acupuncture needle will correspond to the negative electrode or cathode. The intensity of work will be 610μA at the myofascial trigger point. Ultrasound therapy: Application of conventional ultrasound (US) on PGm with a frequency of treatment 1MHz, intensity of 1.5W / cm2, ERA 5cm2, Duty Cycle 100%, treatment time 6 minutes.
Control Group (Ultrasound Therapy)
Group treated with conventional ultrasound (US) on MTrP with 1MHz, 1.5W/cm2, 5cm2 ERA, 100% duty cycle and 15 minutes treatment time. Ultrasound therapy: Application of conventional ultrasound (US) on PGm with a frequency of treatment 1MHz, intensity of 1.5W / cm2, ERA 5cm2, Duty Cycle 100%, treatment time 6 minutes.
Overall Study
STARTED
24
24
Overall Study
COMPLETED
24
24
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Percutaneous Microelectrolysis on Myofascial Trigger Points Pain.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Percutaneous Microelectrolysis Group (MEP)
n=24 Participants
Group exposed to direct current application using an acupuncture needle with intensities in microamps (μA) in MTrP of upper trapezius muscle. Acupuncture needle correspond to negative electrode or cathode. This group was also be treated with conventional ultrasound (US) before MEP application. US treatments parameters will include; 1MHz, 1.5W/cm2, 5cm2 ERA, 100% duty cycle and 15 minutes treatment time. Percutaneous microelectrolysis: 284/5000 Application of Direct Current through an acupuncture needle with intensities in microamps (μA) in the PGm of the upper trapezius muscle. The acupuncture needle will correspond to the negative electrode or cathode. The intensity of work will be 610μA at the myofascial trigger point. Ultrasound therapy: Application of conventional ultrasound (US) on PGm with a frequency of treatment 1MHz, intensity of 1.5W / cm2, ERA 5cm2, Duty Cycle 100%, treatment time 6 minutes.
Ultrasound Therapy
n=24 Participants
Group treated with conventional ultrasound (US) on MTrP with 1MHz, 1.5W/cm2, 5cm2 ERA, 100% duty cycle and 15 minutes treatment time. Ultrasound therapy: Application of conventional ultrasound (US) on PGm with a frequency of treatment 1MHz, intensity of 1.5W / cm2, ERA 5cm2, Duty Cycle 100%, treatment time 6 minutes.
Total
n=48 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
24 Participants
n=99 Participants
24 Participants
n=107 Participants
48 Participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Continuous
22.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 • n=99 Participants
22.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=107 Participants
22.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
n=99 Participants
12 Participants
n=107 Participants
25 Participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants
n=99 Participants
12 Participants
n=107 Participants
23 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants
n=99 Participants
24 Participants
n=107 Participants
48 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Chile
24 Participants
n=99 Participants
24 Participants
n=107 Participants
48 Participants
n=206 Participants
Body mass index (BMI)
24.5 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4 • n=99 Participants
22.9 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 • n=107 Participants
23.6 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 • n=206 Participants
Short trapezius muscle laterality
Right
17 Participants
n=99 Participants
20 Participants
n=107 Participants
37 Participants
n=206 Participants
Short trapezius muscle laterality
Left
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
11 Participants
n=206 Participants
SP-AC
9.2 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8 • n=99 Participants
8.4 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=107 Participants
8.7 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=206 Participants
PPTpre intervention (PPTpre1)
1.4 Kg/cm2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2 • n=99 Participants
1.4 Kg/cm2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2 • n=107 Participants
1.4 Kg/cm2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2 • n=206 Participants
PIpre intervention (PIpre1)
32.1 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=99 Participants
31.4 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1 • n=107 Participants
32.0 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2 • n=206 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: PPTpre1 (baseline), PPTpost1 (post baseline), PPT2 (Day 3), PPT3 (Day 7), assessed an average of 30 minutes at each session

Pain Intensity expressed in kilograms per square centimeter(kg/cm2) reported by participants when performing algometry test at sensitive point of upper trapezius muscle. PPT was valued in four occasions: PPT1 pre (baseline), PPT1 post, PPT 2 (at day 3) and PPT 3 (at day 7). PPT will be evaluated through the BASELINE® pressure algometer.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Percutaneous Microelectrolysis Group (MEP)
n=24 Participants
Group exposed to direct current application using an acupuncture needle with intensities in microamps (μA) in MTrP of upper trapezius muscle. Acupuncture needle correspond to negative electrode or cathode. This group was also be treated with conventional ultrasound (US) before MEP application. US treatments parameters will include; 1MHz, 1.5W/cm2, 5cm2 ERA, 100% duty cycle and 15 minutes treatment time. Percutaneous microelectrolysis: 284/5000 Application of Direct Current through an acupuncture needle with intensities in microamps (μA) in the PGm of the upper trapezius muscle. The acupuncture needle will correspond to the negative electrode or cathode. The intensity of work will be 610μA at the myofascial trigger point. Ultrasound therapy: Application of conventional ultrasound (US) on PGm with a frequency of treatment 1MHz, intensity of 1.5W / cm2, ERA 5cm2, Duty Cycle 100%, treatment time 6 minutes.
Control Group (Ultrasound Therapy)
n=24 Participants
Group treated with conventional ultrasound (US) on MTrP with 1MHz, 1.5W/cm2, 5cm2 ERA, 100% duty cycle and 15 minutes treatment time. Ultrasound therapy: Application of conventional ultrasound (US) on PGm with a frequency of treatment 1MHz, intensity of 1.5W / cm2, ERA 5cm2, Duty Cycle 100%, treatment time 6 minutes.
Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT)
PPTdiff2-1
0.4 Kg/cm2
Standard Deviation 0.2
0.2 Kg/cm2
Standard Deviation 0.2
Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT)
PPTdiff3-1
0.5 Kg/cm2
Standard Deviation 0.4
0.3 Kg/cm2
Standard Deviation 0.3
Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT)
PPTpre1
1.4 Kg/cm2
Standard Deviation 0.2
1.4 Kg/cm2
Standard Deviation 0.2
Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT)
PPTpost1
1.6 Kg/cm2
Standard Deviation 0.2
1.6 Kg/cm2
Standard Deviation 0.2
Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT)
PPT2
1.7 Kg/cm2
Standard Deviation 0.1
1.6 Kg/cm2
Standard Deviation 0.2
Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT)
PPT3
1.9 Kg/cm2
Standard Deviation 0.3
1.7 Kg/cm2
Standard Deviation 0.2
Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT)
PPTdiff1-1
0.2 Kg/cm2
Standard Deviation 0.2
0.2 Kg/cm2
Standard Deviation 0.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: PIpre1 (baseline), PIpost1 (post baseline), PI2 (Day 3), PI3 (Day 7), assessed an average of 3 minutes at each session

Magnitude of pain expressed in millimeters (mm) referred by participants. PI was evaluated through visual analogue scale at moment of performing pressure algometry test in the sensitive point of upper trapezius muscle. PI was assessed with an analogous visual scale where the participant will mark the pain generated by the algometry on a scale of 1 to 100 millimeters. PI was valued in four occasions: PI1 pre (baseline), PI1 post, PI 2 (at day 3) and PI 3 (at day 7).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Percutaneous Microelectrolysis Group (MEP)
n=24 Participants
Group exposed to direct current application using an acupuncture needle with intensities in microamps (μA) in MTrP of upper trapezius muscle. Acupuncture needle correspond to negative electrode or cathode. This group was also be treated with conventional ultrasound (US) before MEP application. US treatments parameters will include; 1MHz, 1.5W/cm2, 5cm2 ERA, 100% duty cycle and 15 minutes treatment time. Percutaneous microelectrolysis: 284/5000 Application of Direct Current through an acupuncture needle with intensities in microamps (μA) in the PGm of the upper trapezius muscle. The acupuncture needle will correspond to the negative electrode or cathode. The intensity of work will be 610μA at the myofascial trigger point. Ultrasound therapy: Application of conventional ultrasound (US) on PGm with a frequency of treatment 1MHz, intensity of 1.5W / cm2, ERA 5cm2, Duty Cycle 100%, treatment time 6 minutes.
Control Group (Ultrasound Therapy)
n=24 Participants
Group treated with conventional ultrasound (US) on MTrP with 1MHz, 1.5W/cm2, 5cm2 ERA, 100% duty cycle and 15 minutes treatment time. Ultrasound therapy: Application of conventional ultrasound (US) on PGm with a frequency of treatment 1MHz, intensity of 1.5W / cm2, ERA 5cm2, Duty Cycle 100%, treatment time 6 minutes.
Pain Intensity (PI)
PIdiff1-1
-7.5 mm
Standard Deviation 8.4
-6.6 mm
Standard Deviation 8.6
Pain Intensity (PI)
PIpre1
32.1 mm
Standard Deviation 13.6
31.4 mm
Standard Deviation 15.1
Pain Intensity (PI)
PIpost1
24.6 mm
Standard Deviation 12.7
24.8 mm
Standard Deviation 15.1
Pain Intensity (PI)
PI2
21.6 mm
Standard Deviation 11.0
23.8 mm
Standard Deviation 14.0
Pain Intensity (PI)
PI3
18.1 mm
Standard Deviation 9.9
20.0 mm
Standard Deviation 13.2
Pain Intensity (PI)
PIdiff2-1
-10.5 mm
Standard Deviation 11.9
-7.6 mm
Standard Deviation 12.1
Pain Intensity (PI)
PIdiff3-1
-14.0 mm
Standard Deviation 12.3
-11.5 mm
Standard Deviation 13.1

Adverse Events

Percutaneous Microelectrolysis Group (MEP)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Control Group (Ultrasound Therapy)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Professor Hernán Andrés de la Barra Ortiz

Universidad Andrés Bello

Phone: +56984706322

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place