Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Guselkumab for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) (NCT NCT03628924)
NCT ID: NCT03628924
Last Updated: 2025-02-04
Results Overview
HiSCR is defined as at least 50 percent (%) reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
184 participants
Week 16
2025-02-04
Participant Flow
Of the 184 enrolled participants, 181 participants received treatment. 3 participants were randomized but did not receive treatment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
Placebo Crossover to Guselkumab 100 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
At Week 16, participants receiving placebo during placebo-controlled period were re-randomized to receive 100 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 16, 20, 28 and 36 and placebo at Weeks 24 and 32. All participants entered safety follow-up at Week 36 through Week 48.
|
Placebo Crossover to Guselkumab 200 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
At Week 16, participants receiving placebo during placebo-controlled period were re-randomized to receive 200 mg guselkumab SC every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 36. All participants entered safety follow-up at Week 36 through Week 48.
|
Guselkumab 200 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
Participants who were receiving 200 mg guselkumab SC during placebo-controlled period, continued to receive 200 mg guselkumab SC q4w through Week 36. All participants entered safety follow-up at Week 36 through Week 48.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV Crossover to Guselkumab 200 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
Participants who were receiving 1200 mg guselkumab IV during placebo-controlled period switched treatment at Week 12 to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC q4w through Week 36. All participants entered safety follow-up at Week 36 through Week 48.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)
STARTED
|
62
|
59
|
60
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)
COMPLETED
|
56
|
56
|
57
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Active Treatment Period (Week 16-48)
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
28
|
28
|
56
|
57
|
|
Active Treatment Period (Week 16-48)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
20
|
24
|
43
|
46
|
|
Active Treatment Period (Week 16-48)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
4
|
13
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
Placebo Crossover to Guselkumab 100 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
At Week 16, participants receiving placebo during placebo-controlled period were re-randomized to receive 100 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 16, 20, 28 and 36 and placebo at Weeks 24 and 32. All participants entered safety follow-up at Week 36 through Week 48.
|
Placebo Crossover to Guselkumab 200 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
At Week 16, participants receiving placebo during placebo-controlled period were re-randomized to receive 200 mg guselkumab SC every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 36. All participants entered safety follow-up at Week 36 through Week 48.
|
Guselkumab 200 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
Participants who were receiving 200 mg guselkumab SC during placebo-controlled period, continued to receive 200 mg guselkumab SC q4w through Week 36. All participants entered safety follow-up at Week 36 through Week 48.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV Crossover to Guselkumab 200 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
Participants who were receiving 1200 mg guselkumab IV during placebo-controlled period switched treatment at Week 12 to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC q4w through Week 36. All participants entered safety follow-up at Week 36 through Week 48.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)
Lack of Efficacy
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Active Treatment Period (Week 16-48)
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
|
Active Treatment Period (Week 16-48)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
4
|
|
Active Treatment Period (Week 16-48)
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
Active Treatment Period (Week 16-48)
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
|
Active Treatment Period (Week 16-48)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
5
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Guselkumab for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=62 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=60 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
Total
n=181 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
60 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
177 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
38.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.55 • n=99 Participants
|
39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.37 • n=107 Participants
|
37.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.92 • n=206 Participants
|
38.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.58 • n=7 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
38 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
115 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
24 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
66 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
46 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
131 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
CANADA
|
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
DENMARK
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
FRANCE
|
13 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
GERMANY
|
13 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
NETHERLANDS
|
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
UNITED STATES
|
23 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants with missing data after applying treatment failure rules were assumed to be non-responders. Participants who discontinued study intervention due to lack of efficacy or Adverse event (AE) of worsening of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), or who started protocol-prohibited medication or therapy during study that could improve HS were considered treatment failures.
HiSCR is defined as at least 50 percent (%) reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=62 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=60 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 16
|
38.7 percentage of participants
|
50.8 percentage of participants
|
45.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. The analysis was based on observed data after applying treatment failure rules (the change from baseline using observed data or 0 \[no improvement\] if a participant met treatment failure \[TF\] criteria). Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in total AN count at Week 16 was reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=57 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant's Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16
|
-3.2 count of abscess and inflammatory nodule
Standard Deviation 7.37
|
-5.3 count of abscess and inflammatory nodule
Standard Deviation 9.29
|
-5.3 count of abscess and inflammatory nodule
Standard Deviation 6.53
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. The analysis was based on observed data after applying treatment failure rules (the change from baseline using observed data or 0 \[no improvement\] if a participant met TF criteria). Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.
DLQI is a simple, compact, and practical questionnaire to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains ten items dealing with the participant's skin. The participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from "Very Much" (score 3) to "Not at All" or "Not relevant" (score 0). The DLQI total score is derived by summing all item scores, which has a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best. A lower score (that is, negative change score) indicates improvement in the Quality of Life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=56 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=57 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16
|
-0.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.17
|
-3.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.81
|
-2.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. Participants who received analgesic therapy for HS within 1 day of a scheduled visit date, the participants were considered a treatment failure at that visit (the change from baseline using observed data or 0 \[no improvement\] if a participant met TF criteria). Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.
HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours with a score range from 0 (no symptom experience) to 10 (worst possible symptom experience). A total symptom score also ranged from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst possible symptom), was derived by averaging the 5 individual scale scores that utilize the past 7-day recall period. Change from baseline in HS-related pain symptom score based on HSSD was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=56 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=55 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=56 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)-Related Pain Symptom Score in the Past 24 Hours Based on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Diary (HSSD) Questionnaire at Week 16
|
-0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.17
|
-1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.05
|
-1.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.93
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who receive at least one administration of study intervention. Participants with missing data after applying treatment failure rules were assumed to be non-responders.
Percentage of participants who achieved at least 50 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=62 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=60 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
|
45.2 percentage of participants
|
55.9 percentage of participants
|
51.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. Participants with missing data after applying treatment failure rules were assumed to be non-responders.
Percentage of participants who achieved at least 75 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=62 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=60 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 75 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
|
30.6 percentage of participants
|
40.7 percentage of participants
|
26.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. Participants with missing data after applying treatment failure rules were assumed to be non-responders.
Percentage of participants who achieved at least 90 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=62 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=60 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
|
17.7 percentage of participants
|
22.0 percentage of participants
|
15.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. Participants with missing data after applying treatment failure rules were assumed to be non-responders.
Percentage of participants who achieved 100 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=62 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=60 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 100 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
|
14.5 percentage of participants
|
15.3 percentage of participants
|
15.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. Participants with missing data after applying treatment failure rules were assumed to be non-responders.
Percentage of participants who achieved an AN count of 0/1 and AN Count of 0/1/2 at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=62 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=60 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count of 0/1 and AN Count of 0/1/2 at Week 16
AN Count of 0/1
|
27.4 percentage of participants
|
30.5 percentage of participants
|
23.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count of 0/1 and AN Count of 0/1/2 at Week 16
AN Count of 0/1/2
|
33.9 percentage of participants
|
39.0 percentage of participants
|
31.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Population analyzed included FAS participants with baseline abscess count \> 0. Participants with missing data after applying treatment failure rules were assumed to be non-responders.
Percentage of participants who achieved abscess count of 0 at Week 16 for participants with baseline abscess count greater than (\>) 0 were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=28 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=36 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=31 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Abscess Count of 0 at Week 16 For Participants With Baseline Abscess Count Greater Than 0
|
39.3 percentage of participants
|
63.9 percentage of participants
|
45.2 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. The analysis was based on observed data after applying treatment failure rules (the change from baseline using observed data or 0 (no improvement) if a participant met TF criteria). Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in number of abscesses at Week 16 was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=57 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of Abscesses at Week 16
|
-0.4 abscess
Standard Deviation 2.72
|
-2.1 abscess
Standard Deviation 4.56
|
-1.6 abscess
Standard Deviation 3.90
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. The analysis was based on observed data after applying treatment failure rules (the change from baseline using observed data or 0 (no improvement) if a participant met TF criteria). Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.
HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours. A total symptom score, also ranged from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst possible symptom), was derived by averaging the 5 individual scale scores that utilize the past 7-day recall period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=56 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=57 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HSSD Symptom Scale Total Score at Week 16
|
-0.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.124
|
-1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.325
|
-0.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.148
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Analysis was based on observed data after applying TF rules (change from baseline using observed data or 0 \[no improvement\] if a participant met TF criteria). Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure and n (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure for specified categories.
HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours. Change from baseline in each individual HSSD component scale (other than pain in the past 24 hours) tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor and itchiness symptom, pain, and current pain score (rated on a scale of 0 \[no symptom experience\] to 10 \[worst possible symptom experience\]) were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=56 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=57 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HSSD Symptom Scale Score (Other Than Pain in the Past 24 Hours) at Week 16
Change in HSSD Tenderness Scale Score
|
-0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.78
|
-2.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.93
|
-1.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in HSSD Symptom Scale Score (Other Than Pain in the Past 24 Hours) at Week 16
Change in HSSD Hot Skin Feeling Scale Score
|
0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.85
|
-1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.12
|
-0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in HSSD Symptom Scale Score (Other Than Pain in the Past 24 Hours) at Week 16
Change in HSSD Odor Scale Score
|
-0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.73
|
-1.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.58
|
-1.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.77
|
|
Change From Baseline in HSSD Symptom Scale Score (Other Than Pain in the Past 24 Hours) at Week 16
Change in HSSD Itchiness Scale Score
|
0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.82
|
-1.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.28
|
-0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.85
|
|
Change From Baseline in HSSD Symptom Scale Score (Other Than Pain in the Past 24 Hours) at Week 16
Change in HSSD Pain Scale Score
|
-0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
-1.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.86
|
-0.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in HSSD Symptom Scale Score (Other Than Pain in the Past 24 Hours) at Week 16
Change in HSSD Current Pain Score
|
-0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.71
|
-1.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.94
|
-1.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Population analyzed included FAS participants with baseline draining fistula count \> 0. Participants with missing data after applying treatment failure rules were assumed to be non-responders.
Percentage of participants who achieved draining fistulas count of 0 at Week 16 for participants with baseline draining fistula count \>0 were reported. Draining fistula were defined as fistulas that drain serous or purulent fluid, either spontaneously or by gentle palpation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=41 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=42 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=39 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Draining Fistula Count of 0 at Week 16 for Participants With Baseline Draining Fistula Count Greater Than 0
|
36.6 percentage of participants
|
31.0 percentage of participants
|
20.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. The analysis was based on observed data after applying treatment failure rules (the change from baseline using observed data or 0 \[no improvement\] if a participant met TF criteria). Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in number of draining fistulas at Week 16 was reported. Draining fistula are defined as fistulas that drain serous or purulent fluid, either spontaneously or by gentle palpation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=57 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Draining Fistulas at Week 16
|
-0.5 fistulas
Standard Deviation 2.87
|
-1.7 fistulas
Standard Deviation 3.77
|
-0.8 fistulas
Standard Deviation 2.08
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Population analyzed included FAS participants with baseline inflammatory nodule count \> 0. Participants with missing data after applying treatment failure rules were assumed to be non-responders.
Percentage of participants who achieved inflammatory nodules count of 0 at Week 16 in participants with baseline inflammatory nodules count \>0 were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=62 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=58 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Inflammatory Nodules Count of 0 at Week 16 for Participants With Baseline Inflammatory Nodule Count Greater Than 0
|
17.7 percentage of participants
|
17.2 percentage of participants
|
18.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. The analysis was based on observed data after applying treatment failure rules (the change from baseline using observed data or 0 (no improvement) if a participant met TF criteria). Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in number of inflammatory nodules at Week 16 was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=57 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Number of Inflammatory Nodules at Week 16
|
-2.8 inflammatory nodule
Standard Deviation 6.96
|
-3.2 inflammatory nodule
Standard Deviation 7.84
|
-3.7 inflammatory nodule
Standard Deviation 4.91
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. Participants with missing data after applying treatment failure rules were assumed to be non-responders.
The HS-IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's HS at a given timepoint. The anatomic region with the most severe HS activity at the baseline was evaluated for erythema, drainage, and pain and/or tenderness to palpation for each participant. The participant's HS is assessed as inactive (0), almost inactive (1), mild activity (2), moderate activity (3), or severe activity (4). A higher score indicates more severe disease. Percentage of participants with HS-IGA score of inactive (0), almost inactive (1), or mild activity (2) and with at least 2-grade improvement relative to baseline at Week 16 were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=62 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=60 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-Grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16
HS-IGA scores of inactive (0)
|
16.1 percentage of participants
|
13.6 percentage of participants
|
13.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-Grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16
HS-IGA scores of inactive (0) or almost inactive (1)
|
24.2 percentage of participants
|
28.8 percentage of participants
|
23.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-Grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16
HS-IGA scores of inactive (0), almost inactive (1), or mild activity (2)
|
24.2 percentage of participants
|
35.6 percentage of participants
|
31.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Population analyzed included FAS participants with HS-IGA scores of moderate activity (3) or severe activity (4) at baseline. Participants with missing data after applying treatment failure rules were assumed to be non-responders.
The HS-IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's HS at a given timepoint. The anatomic region with the most severe HS activity at the baseline was evaluated for erythema, drainage, and pain and/or tenderness to palpation for each participant. Among participants with score of moderate activity (3) or severe activity (4) at baseline, the same anatomic site selected for evaluation at the baseline were re-evaluated at Week 16. The participant's HS is assessed as inactive (0), almost inactive (1), mild activity (2), moderate activity (3), or severe activity (4). A higher score indicates more severe disease. Percentage of participants with HS-IGA score of inactive (0), almost inactive (1) at Week 16 among participants with HS-IGA score of moderate activity (3) or severe activity (4) at baseline were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=55 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=49 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=52 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With HS-IGA Score of Inactive (0) or Almost Inactive (1) at Week 16 Among Participants With HS-IGA Score of Moderate Activity (3) or Severe Activity (4) at Baseline
|
27.3 percentage of participants
|
32.7 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. The analysis was based on observed data after applying treatment failure rules (the change from baseline using observed data or 0 \[no improvement\] if a participant met TF criteria). Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.
The HADS has been developed to identify symptoms of anxiety and depression in hospitalized participants and in outpatients. It comprises 14 items, seven to assess anxiety (HADS-A), namely items 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13; and seven to assess depression (HADS-D), namely items 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14. Each item receives a score from 0 to 3 on a Likert Scale. The total score for each HADS-A and HADS-D scale is obtained by adding the individual scores for each item, with the maximum score 21. The presence or absence of depression and anxiety was defined, for each respective scale, based on the following cutoff values: HADS (anxiety): 0-8 equal to (=) no anxiety; greater than (\>) 9 = anxiety; HADS (depression): 0-8 = no depression; \>9 = depression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=57 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=57 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Week 16
HADS-A
|
0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.60
|
0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.82
|
-0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Week 16
HADS-D
|
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.48
|
-0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.73
|
-0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.69
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. Participants with missing data after applying treatment failure rules were assumed to be non-responders. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in hs-CRP at Week 16 was reported. Serum samples were collected and analyzed for hsCRP. Change from Baseline was calculated as: (\[hs-CRP value at Week 16 minus Baseline value\] divided by \[Baseline value\]).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=52 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=51 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=52 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Week 16
|
-0.308 milligrams per deciliter
Standard Deviation 8.0840
|
3.238 milligrams per deciliter
Standard Deviation 19.0716
|
-2.828 milligrams per deciliter
Standard Deviation 11.1048
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one administration of study intervention. Participants with missing data after applying treatment failure rules are assumed to be 'Not improved'. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.
The PGIC of HS Severity is a questionnaire that measures participants' perceived change (improvement or deterioration) in severity of their HS. Participants rated how his/her HS has changed since the beginning of the study using a 7-point scale ranging from 1 which indicates "a lot better now" to 7 which indicates "a lot worse now" with a neutral center point 4 which indicates ("neither better nor worse"). Participants' PGIC of HS Severity scale score at Week 16 were reported
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=56 Participants
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=56 Participants
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=56 Participants
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scale Score at Week 16
A lot worse now
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scale Score at Week 16
A lot better now
|
4 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scale Score at Week 16
Moderately better now
|
7 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scale Score at Week 16
A little better now
|
16 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scale Score at Week 16
No change
|
20 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scale Score at Week 16
A little worse now
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scale Score at Week 16
Moderately worse now
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
Placebo Crossover to Guselkumab 100 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
Placebo Crossover to Guselkumab 200 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
Guselkumab 200 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV Crossover to Guselkumab 200 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=62 participants at risk
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 participants at risk
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=60 participants at risk
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
Placebo Crossover to Guselkumab 100 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
n=28 participants at risk
At Week 16, participants receiving placebo during placebo-controlled period were re-randomized to receive 100 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 16, 20, 28 and 36 and placebo at Weeks 24 and 32. All participants entered safety follow-up at Week 36 through Week 48.
|
Placebo Crossover to Guselkumab 200 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
n=28 participants at risk
At Week 16, participants receiving placebo during placebo-controlled period were re-randomized to receive 200 mg guselkumab SC every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 36. All participants entered safety follow-up at Week 36 through Week 48.
|
Guselkumab 200 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
n=56 participants at risk
Participants who were receiving 200 mg guselkumab SC during placebo-controlled period, continued to receive 200 mg guselkumab SC q4w through Week 36. All participants entered safety follow-up at Week 36 through Week 48.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV Crossover to Guselkumab 200 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
n=57 participants at risk
Participants who were receiving 1200 mg guselkumab IV during placebo-controlled period switched treatment at Week 12 to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC q4w through Week 36. All participants entered safety follow-up at Week 36 through Week 48.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
1.6%
1/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small Intestinal Perforation
|
1.6%
1/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
1.6%
1/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic Shock
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes Mellitus
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression Suicidal
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute Kidney Injury
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Tonsillar Hypertrophy
|
1.6%
1/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hidradenitis
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic Aneurysm
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo (Week 0 - 16)
n=62 participants at risk
Participants received placebo intravenously (IV) and subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 4, 8 and an additional SC placebo at Week 12.
|
Guselkumab 200 Milligrams (mg) SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=59 participants at risk
Participants received 200 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV to Gus 200 mg SC (Week 0 - 16)
n=60 participants at risk
Participants received 1200 mg guselkumab IV at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, and 200 mg guselkumab SC at Week 12.
|
Placebo Crossover to Guselkumab 100 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
n=28 participants at risk
At Week 16, participants receiving placebo during placebo-controlled period were re-randomized to receive 100 mg guselkumab SC at Weeks 16, 20, 28 and 36 and placebo at Weeks 24 and 32. All participants entered safety follow-up at Week 36 through Week 48.
|
Placebo Crossover to Guselkumab 200 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
n=28 participants at risk
At Week 16, participants receiving placebo during placebo-controlled period were re-randomized to receive 200 mg guselkumab SC every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 36. All participants entered safety follow-up at Week 36 through Week 48.
|
Guselkumab 200 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
n=56 participants at risk
Participants who were receiving 200 mg guselkumab SC during placebo-controlled period, continued to receive 200 mg guselkumab SC q4w through Week 36. All participants entered safety follow-up at Week 36 through Week 48.
|
Guselkumab 1200 mg IV Crossover to Guselkumab 200 mg SC (Week 16 - 48)
n=57 participants at risk
Participants who were receiving 1200 mg guselkumab IV during placebo-controlled period switched treatment at Week 12 to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC q4w through Week 36. All participants entered safety follow-up at Week 36 through Week 48.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain Upper
|
3.2%
2/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
5.0%
3/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.5%
2/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
9.7%
6/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.4%
2/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
10.0%
6/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
7.1%
4/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
3.2%
2/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.4%
2/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
11.7%
7/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.5%
2/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema Peripheral
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
7.0%
4/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
4.8%
3/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
5.0%
3/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
3.2%
2/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
20.3%
12/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
15.0%
9/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
14.3%
4/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
28.6%
8/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
17.9%
10/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
21.1%
12/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
4.8%
3/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
5.1%
3/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
8.3%
5/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
5.3%
3/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
1.6%
1/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.5%
2/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
4.8%
3/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
8.3%
5/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
10.7%
3/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Skin Papilloma
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
11.3%
7/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
10.2%
6/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
10.7%
3/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
5.3%
3/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
5.0%
3/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
5.1%
3/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
1.6%
1/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
6.8%
4/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
5.3%
3/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal Pain
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.3%
2/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
5.3%
3/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
1.6%
1/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
5.4%
3/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
5.3%
3/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hidradenitis
|
1.6%
1/62 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
5.1%
3/59 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
11.7%
7/60 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
7.1%
2/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
14.3%
4/28 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
10.7%
6/56 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
7.0%
4/57 • Up to 48 weeks
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose (complete or partial) of study intervention and participants were analyzed based on the treatment they actually received, regardless of the treatment groups to which they were assigned.
|
Additional Information
Product development portfolio leader
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee A copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested in writing, such publication will be withheld for up to an additional 60 days.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER