Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Water-soluble Head Lice Product. (NCT NCT03617926)
NCT ID: NCT03617926
Last Updated: 2022-07-05
Results Overview
Clinical efficacy is reflected by the % of subjects that are lice-free after 2 topical applications (at day 0 \& day 7 respectively) of the test product. In this analysis, all baseline infestations (mild, moderate, severe) have been included. Assessment is performed at study end (visit 4, day 10). A mild infestation corresponds to 5-9 lice and/or nymphs A moderate infestation corresponds to 10-24 lice and/or nymphs A severe infestation corresponds to 25 or more lice and/or nymphs
COMPLETED
NA
70 participants
Day10
2022-07-05
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Test Product
Water-based lotion (internal code (X92001666)
X92001666: the X92001666 product is a lotion to be applied on dry hair for 15 minutes and then washed out using shampoo. The product is to be applied on Day 0 and repeated again on Day 7.
|
Reference
Commercial, pyrethrin-based shampoo (RID shampoo)
RID shampoo: Active Comparator: RID shampoo The RID shampoo is to be applied on dry the hair for 10 minutes and then rinsed out with water. the product is to be applied on Day 0 and repeated again on Day 7.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
35
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
35
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Water-soluble Head Lice Product.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Test Product
n=35 Participants
Water-based lotion (medical device)
|
Reference
n=35 Participants
RID Shampoo
|
Total
n=70 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
27 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
Years
|
15.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 • n=99 Participants
|
13.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 • n=107 Participants
|
14.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
32 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
65 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
35 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
35 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
35 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Patients with at least 5 head lice and 5 living nits
|
35 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day10Population: In the first analysis, all subjects treated with the test product (n=35), have been analyzed (no correction for re-infestation). In a second analysis, a correction for re-infestation, defined as (1) no adult lice or third-stage nymphs present following the first treatment, and (2) no more than two adult lice or third-stage nymphs found on day 10, has been performed. Results are indicated in the table below.
Clinical efficacy is reflected by the % of subjects that are lice-free after 2 topical applications (at day 0 \& day 7 respectively) of the test product. In this analysis, all baseline infestations (mild, moderate, severe) have been included. Assessment is performed at study end (visit 4, day 10). A mild infestation corresponds to 5-9 lice and/or nymphs A moderate infestation corresponds to 10-24 lice and/or nymphs A severe infestation corresponds to 25 or more lice and/or nymphs
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=35 Participants
Water-based lotion (internal code (X92001666))
|
Reference
RID Shampoo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects That Are Lice-free After 2 Treatments With Test Product (Including All Baseline Infestations).
Number of lice-free subjects (uncorrected for re-infestation)
|
30 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Subjects That Are Lice-free After 2 Treatments With Test Product (Including All Baseline Infestations).
Number of lice-free subjects (corrected for re-infestation)
|
30 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 10Population: In the first analysis, all subjects treated with the reference product (n=35), have been analyzed (no correction for re-infestation). In a second analysis, a correction for re-infestation, defined as (1) no adult lice or third-stage nymphs present following the first treatment, and (2) no more than two adult lice or third-stage nymphs found on day 10, has been performed. Results are indicated in the table below.
Clinical efficacy is reflected by the % of subjects that are lice-free after 2 topical applications (at day 0 \& day 7 respectively) of the reference product. In this analysis, all baseline infestations (mild, moderate, severe) have been included. Assessment is performed at study end (visit 4, day 10). A mild infestation corresponds to 5-9 lice and/or nymphs A moderate infestation corresponds to 10-24 lice and/or nymphs A severe infestation corresponds to 25 or more lice and/or nymphs
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=35 Participants
Water-based lotion (internal code (X92001666))
|
Reference
RID Shampoo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects That Are Lice-free After 2 Treatments With Reference Product (Including All Baseline Infestations).
Number of lice-free subjects (uncorrected for re-infestation)
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Subjects That Are Lice-free After 2 Treatments With Reference Product (Including All Baseline Infestations).
Number of lice-free subjects (corrected for re-infestation)
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 10Population: 28 subjects with light to moderate infestation (5-25 lice) and treated with test product have been included in this analysis. Subjects with severe infestation (\>25 lice; n=7) were excluded.
The % of subjects with a mild (5-9 lice and/or nymphs) and moderate (10-24 lice and/or nymphs) baseline infestation that are lice-free after two topical treatments (day 0 \& day 7) with the test product; assessed at study end (visit 4; day 10).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=28 Participants
Water-based lotion (internal code (X92001666))
|
Reference
RID Shampoo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects That Are Lice-free After 2 Treatments With Test Product (Only Mild and Moderate Baseline Infestations).
|
25 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 10Population: 33 subjects with mild to moderate infestation, treated with reference product, have been included in this analysis. Subjects with severe infestation (\>25 lice; n=2) were excluded.
The % of subjects with a mild (5-9 lice and/or nymphs) and moderate (10-24 lice and/or nymphs) baseline infestation that are lice-free after two topical treatments (day 0 \& day 7) with the reference product; assessed at study end (visit 4; day 10).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=33 Participants
Water-based lotion (internal code (X92001666))
|
Reference
RID Shampoo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects That Are Lice-free After 2 Treatments With Reference Product (Only Mild and Moderate Baseline Infestations).
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1The % of subjects that are lice-free after one topical treatment with the test product (assessment 24h post treatment), considering all baseline infestations (mild, moderate, severe). A mild infestation corresponds to 5-9 lice and/or nymphs A moderate infestation corresponds to 10-24 lice and/or nymphs A severe infestation corresponds to 25 or more lice and/or nymphs
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=35 Participants
Water-based lotion (internal code (X92001666))
|
Reference
RID Shampoo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects That Are Lice-Free After 1 Treatment With Test Product (All Baseline Infestations).
|
30 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1The % of subjects that are lice-free after one topical treatment with the reference product (assessment 24h post treatment), considering all baseline infestations (mild, moderate, severe). A mild infestation corresponds to 5-9 lice and/or nymphs A moderate infestation corresponds to 10-24 lice and/or nymphs A severe infestation corresponds to 25 or more lice and/or nymphs
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=35 Participants
Water-based lotion (internal code (X92001666))
|
Reference
RID Shampoo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects That Are Lice-free After 1 Treatment With Reference Product (All Baseline Infestations).
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0, Day 1, Day 7, Day10Population: Concerns a safety parameter. The safety set/population consists of all subjects who were randomised and exposed to study medication. The table below shows the total number of participants in each test group, experiencing mild to severe pruritus (combined), at the different evaluation time points.
The occurrence and degree of pruritus is rated by the blinded clinical investigator at each visit, using the following scores: none (best outcome), mild, moderate, and severe (worst outcome). None: the scalp does not itch; Mild: occasional episodes of itching, not bothersome; Moderate: frequent, several times a day, bothersome; Severe: nearly constant, frequent scratching, very bothersome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=35 Participants
Water-based lotion (internal code (X92001666))
|
Reference
n=35 Participants
RID Shampoo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Pruritus (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Pruritus D10
|
7 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Pruritus (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Pruritus D0 pre-treatment
|
27 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Pruritus (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Pruritus D0 post-treatment
|
14 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Pruritus (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Pruritus D1
|
8 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Pruritus (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Pruritus D7 pre-treatment
|
9 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Pruritus (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Pruritus D7 post-treatment
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0, Day 1, Day 7, Day10Population: Concerns a safety parameter. The safety set/population consists of all subjects who were randomised and exposed to study medication. The table below shows the total number of participants in each test group, experiencing mild to severe scalp excoriation (combined), at the different evaluation time points.
The occurrence and degree of scalp excoriation (breaking of the skin, usually caused by scratching) is rated by the blinded clinical investigator at each visit, using the following scores: none (best outcome), mild, moderate, and severe (worst outcome). None: no broken skin on the scalp; Mild: one or two areas on the scalp on which skin is broken; Moderate: more than two separate areas of the scalp with broken skin but not generalized across the scalp; Severe: widespread breaking of the skin involving most of the scalp.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=35 Participants
Water-based lotion (internal code (X92001666))
|
Reference
n=35 Participants
RID Shampoo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Scalp Excoriation (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Scalp Excoriation D0 pre-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Scalp Excoriation (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Scalp Excoriation D0 post-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Scalp Excoriation (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Scalp Excoriation D1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Scalp Excoriation (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Scalp Excoriation D7 post-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Scalp Excoriation (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Scalp Excoriation D7 pre-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Scalp Excoriation (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Scalp Excoriation D10
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0, Day 1, Day 7, Day10Population: Concerns a safety parameter. The safety set/population consists of all subjects who were randomised and exposed to study medication. The table below shows the total number of participants in each test group, experiencing mild to severe paraesthesia (combined), at the different evaluation time points.
The occurrence and degree of paraesthesia (tingling or prickling sensation) is rated by the blinded clinical investigator at each visit, using the following scores: none (best outcome), mild, moderate, and severe (worst outcome). None: no tingling or prickling sensation; Mild: occasional tingling or prickling sensation; Moderate: frequent tingling or prickling sensation; Severe: nearly constant tingling or prickling sensation
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=35 Participants
Water-based lotion (internal code (X92001666))
|
Reference
n=35 Participants
RID Shampoo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Paraesthesia (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Paraesthesia D0 pre-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Paraesthesia (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Paraesthesia D0 post-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Paraesthesia (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Paraesthesia D1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Paraesthesia (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Paraesthesia D7 pre-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Paraesthesia (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Paraesthesia D7 post-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Paraesthesia (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Paraesthesia D10
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0, Day 1, Day 7, Day10Population: Concerns a safety parameter. The safety set/population consists of all subjects who were randomised and exposed to study medication. The table below shows the total number of participants in each test group, experiencing mild to severe skin erythema (combined), at the different evaluation time points.
The occurrence and degree of skin erythema (redness of the scalp) is rated by the blinded clinical investigator at each visit, using the following scores: none (best outcome), mild, moderate, and severe (worst outcome). None: no redness of the scalp; Mild: faint, barely perceptible erythema with limited distribution; Moderate: diffuse pink areas of scalp are readily visible; Severe: large areas of the scalp are red.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=35 Participants
Water-based lotion (internal code (X92001666))
|
Reference
n=35 Participants
RID Shampoo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Skin Erythema (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Skin erythema D0 pre-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Skin Erythema (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Skin erythema D0 post-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Skin Erythema (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Skin erythema D1
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Skin Erythema (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Skin erythema D7 pre-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Skin Erythema (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Skin erythema D7 post-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Skin Erythema (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Skin erythema D10
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0, Day 1, Day 7, Day10Population: Concerns a safety parameter. The safety set/population consists of all subjects who were randomised and exposed to study medication. The table below shows the total number of participants in each test group, experiencing mild to severe pyroderma (combined), at the different evaluation time points.
The occurrence and degree of pyroderma (sores filled with clear fluid, pus or crusting) is rated by the blinded clinical investigator at each visit, using the following scores: none (best outcome), mild, moderate, and severe (worst outcome). None: no lesions visible on the scalp; Mild: one or two lesions visible with crusting or other evidence of infection; Moderate: presence of more than two lesions with crusting or other evidence of infection, but not generalized across the scalp; Severe: lesions with crusting or other evidence of infection, involving most of the scalp.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=35 Participants
Water-based lotion (internal code (X92001666))
|
Reference
n=35 Participants
RID Shampoo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Pyroderma (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Pyroderma D0 pre-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Pyroderma (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Pyroderma D0 post-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Pyroderma (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Pyroderma D1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Pyroderma (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Pyroderma D7 pre-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Pyroderma (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Pyroderma D7 post-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Pyroderma (Local Tolerability Parameter), as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Pyroderma D10
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0, Day 1, Day 7, Day10Population: Concerns a safety parameter. The safety set/population consists of all subjects who were randomised and exposed to study medication. The table below shows the total number of participants in each test group, experiencing mild to severe eye irritation (combined), at the different evaluation time points.
The occurrence and degree of eye irritation (stinging, burning sensation, and/or pain) is rated by the blinded clinical investigator at each visit, using the following scores: none (best outcome), mild, moderate, and severe (worst outcome). None: no stinging, burning or pain Mild: slight mild stinging, burning or pain Moderate: moderate stinging, burning or pain Severe: severe stinging, burning or pain
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=35 Participants
Water-based lotion (internal code (X92001666))
|
Reference
n=35 Participants
RID Shampoo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Eye Irritation, as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Eye irritation D0 pre-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Eye Irritation, as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Eye irritation D0 post-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Eye Irritation, as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Eye irritation D1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Eye Irritation, as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Eye irritation D7 pre-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Eye Irritation, as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Eye irritation D7 post-treatment
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Effect of Both Investigational Treatments on Eye Irritation, as Assessed by a Blinded Clinical Investigator.
Eye irritation D10
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 10Population: All subjects that have been treated at D0 \& D7 with test or reference product, respectively.
Global tolerability is defined as the general well-being and comfort of the subjects. This parameter is assessed at day 10 in subjects, treated with either test product or reference product, respectively. The subject is asked to score his general feeling at study end and must provide a justification for his/her answer. Scoring was performed as follows: very good (best case), good, moderate, or poor (worst case).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=35 Participants
Water-based lotion (internal code (X92001666))
|
Reference
n=35 Participants
RID Shampoo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Global Tolerability, Evaluated at Study End (Visit 4, Day 10)
Very good
|
23 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Global Tolerability, Evaluated at Study End (Visit 4, Day 10)
Good
|
12 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Study period (10 days) + in case of adverse events: clinical staff will monitor the trial subject's safety from the occurrence of an AE until recovery, return to baseline or a stable state will be achieved.Population: All subjects that have been exposed to at least 1 treatment (either test product or reference).
Recording Adverse Events and investigating the relationship with the treatment. At each visit (D0: first treatment; D1: 24h post-treatment assessment; D7: second treatment; D10: final assessment), the clinical staff is recording adverse events (if any) and evaluates the correlation with the treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=35 Participants
Water-based lotion (internal code (X92001666))
|
Reference
n=35 Participants
RID Shampoo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of Adverse Events Occurring After 1 and 2 Treatments With Both Investigational Products.
Serious Adverse Events
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Assessment of Adverse Events Occurring After 1 and 2 Treatments With Both Investigational Products.
All-cause mortality
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Assessment of Adverse Events Occurring After 1 and 2 Treatments With Both Investigational Products.
Other Adverse Events (Not including serious AE)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Test Product
Reference
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place