Comparison of Static Air Support Devices (Repose®) and Alternating-Pressure Devices in the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers

NCT03597750 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 308

Last updated 2018-10-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Maintaining and improving skin health are major goals in acute and long-term care. Patients at the extremes of age, the critically ill, medically compromised and those with immobility are at risk for developing several skin disorders, with pressure ulcers (PUs) as one of the most common and mostly preventable ones. Prevalence figures of PUs vary between 6.4% and 31.4%. PUs are described as localised injuries to the skin and/or underlying tissue, usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure or pressure combined with shear. Prevention of PUs is internationally seen to be a key quality indicator of care. To prevent PUs, reducing both the amount and the duration of pressure and shear at the pressure points of the body is strongly recommended. One of the interventions to achieving this, is the use of pressure-reducing devices (mattresses, cushions, etc.). Studies that compare the (cost-) effectiveness of different pressure-reducing devices are needed.

The primary aim of this study is to compare the (cost-) effectiveness of pressure ulcer prevention in high risk patients using static air support devices (Repose®) versus alternating-pressure devices. The second aim is to get insight in patients' experiences and perceptions of comfort using static air support devices and alternating-pressure devices. The third aim is to get insight in caretakers' perceptions of barriers and facilitators of the use of static air support devices and alternating-pressure devices and to reveal how these perceptions influence the readiness to use the products in clinical practice.

This randomized controlled trial will be performed in ca. 25 nursing homes in a random sample of 306 residents who are at high risk of developing pressure ulcers. Residents will be included in the study for a period of 14 days. Skin assessment and risk factor registration will be done on a daily basis by the nurses. Reliability checks and time measurements will be completed by the researcher.

Conditions

  • Pressure Ulcer
  • Pressure Injury
  • Pressure Sore
  • Bed Sore

Interventions

DEVICE

Repose®

* Repose® Mattress * Repose® Cushion * Repose® Wedge or Foot Protectors

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Frontier Medical Group, UK

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • University Ghent

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Dimitri Beeckman, PhD · University Ghent

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-04-19
Primary Completion
2018-07-15
Completion
2018-07-15

Countries

  • Belgium

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03597750 on ClinicalTrials.gov