Evaluation of Covered Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents for Endovascular Treatment of Chronic Ischemia Mesenteric Disease.
NCT03586739 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 179
Last updated 2024-07-03
Summary
Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia (CMI) is defined by one or more arterial digestive lesions, responsible for severe mesenteric symptoms. The clinical presentation of CMI is characterized by postprandial abdominal pain and weight loss, leading to severe malnutrition. It is a frequent pathology which affects preferentially the elderly patients of female sex (70%) with cardio-vascular comorbidities. Risk factors include smoking, hypertension, and dyslipidemia.
Despite medical and diagnostic advances, the morbidity and mortality of CMI remain very high (\>70%). Optimal management of CMI is based on early diagnosis. Symptomatic patients with CMI should be treated without much delay to relief symptoms (present in 43% patients) and prevent acute mesenteric ischemia.
The three visceral arteries affected by atherosclerotic disease are coeliac trunc, inferior mesenteric artery and Superior Mesenteric Artery (SMA). The SMA is treated the most frequently, because it is the main relevant artery associated with CMI.
Endovascular treatment (angioplasty and stenting) is considered as the first-line treatment for CMI when feasible. It is indicated especially in the case of high grade stenosis or occlusion of the Superior Mesenteric Artery. Two types of stents can be used for this procedure: bare metal stents (BMS) or covered stents (CS).
Even if BMS are standard care there is no consensus on the type of stent to use.
There are very few reported series with large numbers of patients comparing BMS and CS in this indication. However, to our knowledge, no results from a randomized study addressing this issue have ever been published. These are only retrospective with a low level of evidence (IIb). The largest series compared 147 patients with primary intervention for CMI treatment using BMS versus 42 using CS. Treatment with CS showed better results in terms of symptom recurrence (10% vs 32%, p \<0.002), restenosis (12% vs 42%, p \<0.0002) and re-interventions (10% vs 42%), after at least 1 year of follow-up. Indeed, endovascular treatment using BMS was associated with high incidence of symptoms recurrence despite the satisfying patency rates in both occluded and stenotic vessels.
There are no international guidelines to recommend the use of one or another sort of stent.
The necessity of a randomised study addressing the issue of bare metal versus covered stents deployment seems to be important.
The investigators propose to demonstrate that covered stents presents a better efficacy than bare metal stents, with a multicenter randomized study involving 24 vascular surgical departments of French University Hospitals.
Conditions
- Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia
- Stent Stenosis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
endovascular angioplasty using covered stents
Primary endovascular angioplasty using one or several covered stents
- PROCEDURE
-
endovascular angioplasty using bare metal stents
Primary endovascular angioplasty using one or several bare metal stents
- DEVICE
-
Duplex-scan
a Duplex-scan will be performed during patient follow up.
- DEVICE
-
computerized tomography scan (CT-scan)
a CT-scan will be performed in the event of symptoms of recurrence or restenosis as confirmatory exam according to clinical practice during patient follow up. The CT-scan will be mandatory at 12 and 24 months if it has not been planned in the current practice follow-up.
- DEVICE
-
digital angiography
In case CT-scan cannot be performed (e.g. occurrence of a non-preexisting contra-indication), a digital angiography will be authorised instead to confirm restenosis during patient follow-up.
- OTHER
-
Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire
The patient will complete a quality-of-life questionnaire (SF-36 form) during their follow up.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hospices Civils de Lyon
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-12-12
- Primary Completion
- 2024-04-26
- Completion
- 2024-04-26
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Endoscopic Treatment of Biliary Stricture Caused by Chronic Pancreatitis
NCT01085747 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Bare-metal Stent vs Covered Stent in Chinese Patients With Subclavian Occlusive Lesions
NCT03737162 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Metal Versus Plastic Stent in Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction
NCT03857958 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Covered Self-expandable Metallic Stent (SEMS) Above/Across the Sphincter of Oddi
NCT01041612 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Fully Covered Self-expandable Metal Stents (FCMS) in Benign Biliary Strictures
NCT02105181 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Covered Versus Uncovered SEMS for Palliation of Malignant Biliary Strictures.
NCT02930252 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
cSEMS vs. NEPS in Stricture of Biliary Anastomosis After Liver Transplantation
NCT01393067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long-Term Outcomes of Different Stents for Benign Biliary Strictures Caused by Chronic Pancreatitis
NCT06981975 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Partially Covered Metal Stents Efficacy in Biliary Drainage of Malignant Extra-hepatic Biliary Obstruction
NCT04431427 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Portal Vein Stenting for Malignant Obstruction: Feasibility, Safety, and Clinical Outcomes
NCT07252570 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Outcome Study of Double Bare Stent for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction
NCT02156505 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Covered Versus Uncovered Self-expandable Metallic Stents for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction
NCT01646476 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Study Comparing Sems Placement With and and Without Biliary Sphincterectomy in Patients With Malignant Biliary Obstruction
NCT03628001 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Metal and Plastic Biliary Stents to Drain Malignant Distal Biliary Strictures.
NCT05761496 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Single Plastic Stent Vs. Fully Covered Self-Expanding Metal Stent on Benign Biliary Stricture Secondary to Chronic Pancreatitis
NCT06655051 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Randomized Study for Efficacy of Uncovered Double Bare Metallic Stent Compared to Uncovered Single Bare Metallic Stent in Malignant Biliary Obstruction
NCT01869894 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
EUS-GE vs ES for Palliation of Gastric Outlet Obstruction
NCT03259763 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Covered vs. Uncovered SEMS for Occluded Biliary Metal Stents
NCT01315522 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Biliary Drainage Preceding Possible Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Are Self-expandable Metallic Stents (SEMS) Superior to Plastic Stents?
NCT03350763 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of a New Metal Biliary Stent of 12-mm Diameter: a Case Control Study
NCT04405752 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Fully Covered or Partially Covered Stents in Malignant Esophageal Strictures
NCT01661686 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Short Message Service Intervention on Stent Removal/Exchange Adherence in Patients With Benign Pancreaticobiliary Diseases
NCT02041390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Usefulness of Self-expandable Metal Stents(SEMS) for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: a Prospective Study Using New Designed Stents
NCT02440724 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Radiation Stent Versus Self-expanding Metallic Stents (SEMS) for Palliative Treatment of Malignant Biliary Stricture
NCT01320241 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
IRS(Irradiation Stent) vs. CS(Conventional Stent) Insertion in Inoperable Malignant Biliary Obstruction
NCT02001779 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA