Introducing Palliative Care (PC) Within the Treatment of End Stage Liver Disease (ESLD)

NCT03540771 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1494

Last updated 2025-12-02

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

This is a comparative effectiveness study of two pragmatic models aiming to introduce palliative care for end stage liver disease patients. The 2 comparators are:

Model 1: Consultative Palliative Care (i.e. direct access to Palliative Care provider), Model 2: Trained Hepatologist- led PC intervention (i.e. a hepatologist will receive formal training to deliver Palliative Care services)

Primary Outcome: The change in quality of life from baseline to 3 months post enrollment as assessed by FACT-Hep (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Hepatobiliary).

Primary Hypothesis: Compared to consultative PC, the trained hepatologist-led PC for ESLD patients will show superior primary outcome. In the event of nonsignificant superiority, the trained hepatologist-led PC led will show non-inferiority (NI) by ruling out a 4-point reduction (NI margin) in mean of the primary outcome as compared to the consultative PC.

Power: The study has 83.2% power to detect minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 9 points in mean of the primary outcome between the two randomized arms. We have 79.2% power for the noninferiority hypothesis, under assumption that the trained hepatologist-led PC arm performs better than the consultative PC arm by half of the above MCID.

Setting: 19 Clinical Centers across US are recruited to participate in this study.

Qualitative nested study will interview patients, caregivers and providers to assess their experiences with participating in the palliative care trial.

Conditions

  • End Stage Liver Disease
  • Decompensated Cirrhosis of Liver

Interventions

OTHER

Palliative Care

The intervention will comprise an approach to render palliative care, as taught to hepatologists through an on-line learning platform, and as delivered by PC providers as routine care. The elements of the intervention, which will be guided by a checklist and implemented over the course of interactions with the patient and caregivers at the initial, 1, 2, and 3 month visits, to include: 1. Patient/caregiver understanding of diagnosis, illness and prognosis 2. Symptom assessment and management 3. Psychosocial assessment and management 4. Distress screening and management 5. Discussion of goals of care 6. Advanced directives

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

    collaborator OTHER
  • Albert Einstein Healthcare Network

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Manisha Verma, MD, MPH · Albert Einstein Healthcare Network

  • Victor Navarro, MD · Albert Einstein Healthcare Network

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
120 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-01-30
Primary Completion
2025-06-30
Completion
2025-08-30

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03540771 on ClinicalTrials.gov