Trial Outcomes & Findings for Practical Telemedicine to Improve Control and Engagement for Veterans With Clinic-Refractory Diabetes Mellitus (NCT NCT03520413)
NCT ID: NCT03520413
Last Updated: 2023-07-27
Results Overview
Laboratory blood test to measure diabetes control
COMPLETED
NA
200 participants
12 months
2023-07-27
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
PRACTICE-DM
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying Persistently Poorly controlled Diabetes Mellitus (PPDM) - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources.
PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
|
Standard VA Home Telehealth
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
101
|
99
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
77
|
73
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
24
|
26
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
PRACTICE-DM
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying Persistently Poorly controlled Diabetes Mellitus (PPDM) - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources.
PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
|
Standard VA Home Telehealth
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
3
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Completed a study interview but did not obtain HbA1c data
|
19
|
19
|
Baseline Characteristics
Practical Telemedicine to Improve Control and Engagement for Veterans With Clinic-Refractory Diabetes Mellitus
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
PRACTICE-DM
n=101 Participants
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying PPDM - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing VHA Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources.
PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
|
Standard VA Home Telehealth
n=99 Participants
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
|
Total
n=200 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
76 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
151 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
25 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 • n=99 Participants
|
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.0 • n=107 Participants
|
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
24 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
77 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
78 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
155 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
95 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
93 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
188 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
68 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
76 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
144 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
25 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States · Richmond, VA
|
44 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
85 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States · Durham, NC
|
57 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
115 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Baseline Hemoglobin A1c
|
10.1 % HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=99 Participants
|
10.2 % HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=107 Participants
|
10.2 % HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (kg/m^2)
|
34.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4 • n=99 Participants
|
35.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.0 • n=107 Participants
|
34.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)
|
1.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 • n=99 Participants
|
1.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=107 Participants
|
1.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ)
|
6.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 • n=99 Participants
|
6.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=107 Participants
|
6.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Self-Efficacy (PCS)
|
5.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 • n=99 Participants
|
5.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=107 Participants
|
5.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Depression (PHQ-8)
|
7.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2 • n=99 Participants
|
7.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1 • n=107 Participants
|
7.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7 • n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Mixed models were used to analyze outcomes. This methodology uses all observations from baseline and the follow-up timepoints. Therefore 200 observations were included at baseline and 150 observations at 12 months.
Laboratory blood test to measure diabetes control
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PRACTICE-DM
n=101 Participants
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying Persistently Poorly controlled Diabetes Mellitus (PPDM) - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing VHA Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources.
PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
|
Standard VA Home Telehealth
n=99 Participants
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hemoglobin A1c
|
8.58 % HbA1c
Interval 8.22 to 8.94
|
9.19 % HbA1c
Interval 8.83 to 9.55
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsMeasure of diabetes distress and burden using the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS). 17 items, Scale 1-6. Scoring: Average. Higher score indicates higher distress level.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PRACTICE-DM
n=101 Participants
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying Persistently Poorly controlled Diabetes Mellitus (PPDM) - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing VHA Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources.
PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
|
Standard VA Home Telehealth
n=99 Participants
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diabetes Distress Scale
|
1.43 score on a scale
Interval 1.3 to 1.56
|
1.67 score on a scale
Interval 1.54 to 1.81
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsMeasure of diabetes self-care. Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ). 16 items, Scale 0-3. Scoring: Sum and transform to fall between 0-10. Higher score indicates more effective self-care.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PRACTICE-DM
n=101 Participants
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying Persistently Poorly controlled Diabetes Mellitus (PPDM) - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing VHA Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources.
PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
|
Standard VA Home Telehealth
n=99 Participants
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire
|
8.34 score on a scale
Interval 8.15 to 8.54
|
7.83 score on a scale
Interval 7.63 to 8.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsMeasure of diabetes self-efficacy and capacity. Perceived Competence Scale (PCS). 4 items, Scale 1-7. Scoring: average (1-7) Higher score indicates greater confidence.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PRACTICE-DM
n=101 Participants
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying Persistently Poorly controlled Diabetes Mellitus (PPDM) - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing VHA Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources.
PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
|
Standard VA Home Telehealth
n=99 Participants
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Perceived Competence Scale
|
6.31 score on a scale
Interval 6.09 to 6.54
|
5.92 score on a scale
Interval 5.69 to 6.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsMeasure of weight at 6months due to low number of 12month in person visits permitting data collection as a result of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) restrictions
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PRACTICE-DM
n=101 Participants
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying Persistently Poorly controlled Diabetes Mellitus (PPDM) - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing VHA Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources.
PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
|
Standard VA Home Telehealth
n=99 Participants
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Body Mass Index
|
35.05 kg/m^2
Interval 34.1 to 36.01
|
34.86 kg/m^2
Interval 33.91 to 35.82
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsMeasure of depressive symptoms, Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ8). 8 items, Scale 0-3, Scoring average of responses 0-24. Higher score indicates greater depressive symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PRACTICE-DM
n=101 Participants
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying Persistently Poorly controlled Diabetes Mellitus (PPDM) - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing VHA Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources.
PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
|
Standard VA Home Telehealth
n=99 Participants
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire-8
|
4.64 score on a scale
Interval 3.62 to 5.66
|
5.80 score on a scale
Interval 4.75 to 6.85
|
Adverse Events
PRACTICE-DM
Standard VA Home Telehealth
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
PRACTICE-DM
n=101 participants at risk
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying PPDM - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing VHA Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources.
PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
|
Standard VA Home Telehealth
n=99 participants at risk
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Hospitalization
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hospitalization
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
General disorders
Hospitalization
|
0.00%
0/101 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hospitalization
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hospitalization
|
0.00%
0/101 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
4.0%
4/99 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Hospitalization
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hospitalization
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hospitalization
|
0.00%
0/101 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hospitalization
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Hospitalization
|
0.00%
0/101 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hospitalization
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Hospitalization
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Important Medical Event
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
General disorders
Important Medical Event
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
Infections and infestations
Important Medical Event
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Important Medical Event
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Important Medical Event
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Important Medical Event
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
General disorders
Persistent or Significant Illness
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Persistent or Significant Illness
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Matthew Crowley, MD
Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place