Trial Outcomes & Findings for Practical Telemedicine to Improve Control and Engagement for Veterans With Clinic-Refractory Diabetes Mellitus (NCT NCT03520413)

NCT ID: NCT03520413

Last Updated: 2023-07-27

Results Overview

Laboratory blood test to measure diabetes control

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

200 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

12 months

Results posted on

2023-07-27

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
PRACTICE-DM
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying Persistently Poorly controlled Diabetes Mellitus (PPDM) - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources. PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
Standard VA Home Telehealth
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring. Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Overall Study
STARTED
101
99
Overall Study
COMPLETED
77
73
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
24
26

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
PRACTICE-DM
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying Persistently Poorly controlled Diabetes Mellitus (PPDM) - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources. PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
Standard VA Home Telehealth
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring. Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1
1
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
1
2
Overall Study
Death
0
1
Overall Study
Physician Decision
3
3
Overall Study
Completed a study interview but did not obtain HbA1c data
19
19

Baseline Characteristics

Practical Telemedicine to Improve Control and Engagement for Veterans With Clinic-Refractory Diabetes Mellitus

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
PRACTICE-DM
n=101 Participants
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying PPDM - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing VHA Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources. PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
Standard VA Home Telehealth
n=99 Participants
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring. Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Total
n=200 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
76 Participants
n=99 Participants
75 Participants
n=107 Participants
151 Participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
25 Participants
n=99 Participants
24 Participants
n=107 Participants
49 Participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Continuous
57.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 • n=99 Participants
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.0 • n=107 Participants
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 • n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants
n=99 Participants
21 Participants
n=107 Participants
45 Participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
77 Participants
n=99 Participants
78 Participants
n=107 Participants
155 Participants
n=206 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
11 Participants
n=206 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
95 Participants
n=99 Participants
93 Participants
n=107 Participants
188 Participants
n=206 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
68 Participants
n=99 Participants
76 Participants
n=107 Participants
144 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
25 Participants
n=99 Participants
17 Participants
n=107 Participants
42 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
9 Participants
n=206 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States · Richmond, VA
44 Participants
n=99 Participants
41 Participants
n=107 Participants
85 Participants
n=206 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States · Durham, NC
57 Participants
n=99 Participants
58 Participants
n=107 Participants
115 Participants
n=206 Participants
Baseline Hemoglobin A1c
10.1 % HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=99 Participants
10.2 % HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=107 Participants
10.2 % HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 • n=206 Participants
Body Mass Index (kg/m^2)
34.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4 • n=99 Participants
35.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.0 • n=107 Participants
34.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 • n=206 Participants
Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)
1.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 • n=99 Participants
1.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=107 Participants
1.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=206 Participants
Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ)
6.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 • n=99 Participants
6.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=107 Participants
6.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=206 Participants
Self-Efficacy (PCS)
5.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 • n=99 Participants
5.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=107 Participants
5.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 • n=206 Participants
Depression (PHQ-8)
7.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2 • n=99 Participants
7.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1 • n=107 Participants
7.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7 • n=206 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Population: Mixed models were used to analyze outcomes. This methodology uses all observations from baseline and the follow-up timepoints. Therefore 200 observations were included at baseline and 150 observations at 12 months.

Laboratory blood test to measure diabetes control

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
PRACTICE-DM
n=101 Participants
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying Persistently Poorly controlled Diabetes Mellitus (PPDM) - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing VHA Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources. PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
Standard VA Home Telehealth
n=99 Participants
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring. Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Hemoglobin A1c
8.58 % HbA1c
Interval 8.22 to 8.94
9.19 % HbA1c
Interval 8.83 to 9.55

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Measure of diabetes distress and burden using the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS). 17 items, Scale 1-6. Scoring: Average. Higher score indicates higher distress level.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
PRACTICE-DM
n=101 Participants
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying Persistently Poorly controlled Diabetes Mellitus (PPDM) - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing VHA Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources. PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
Standard VA Home Telehealth
n=99 Participants
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring. Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Diabetes Distress Scale
1.43 score on a scale
Interval 1.3 to 1.56
1.67 score on a scale
Interval 1.54 to 1.81

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Measure of diabetes self-care. Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ). 16 items, Scale 0-3. Scoring: Sum and transform to fall between 0-10. Higher score indicates more effective self-care.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
PRACTICE-DM
n=101 Participants
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying Persistently Poorly controlled Diabetes Mellitus (PPDM) - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing VHA Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources. PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
Standard VA Home Telehealth
n=99 Participants
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring. Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire
8.34 score on a scale
Interval 8.15 to 8.54
7.83 score on a scale
Interval 7.63 to 8.03

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Measure of diabetes self-efficacy and capacity. Perceived Competence Scale (PCS). 4 items, Scale 1-7. Scoring: average (1-7) Higher score indicates greater confidence.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
PRACTICE-DM
n=101 Participants
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying Persistently Poorly controlled Diabetes Mellitus (PPDM) - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing VHA Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources. PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
Standard VA Home Telehealth
n=99 Participants
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring. Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Perceived Competence Scale
6.31 score on a scale
Interval 6.09 to 6.54
5.92 score on a scale
Interval 5.69 to 6.16

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Measure of weight at 6months due to low number of 12month in person visits permitting data collection as a result of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) restrictions

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
PRACTICE-DM
n=101 Participants
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying Persistently Poorly controlled Diabetes Mellitus (PPDM) - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing VHA Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources. PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
Standard VA Home Telehealth
n=99 Participants
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring. Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Body Mass Index
35.05 kg/m^2
Interval 34.1 to 36.01
34.86 kg/m^2
Interval 33.91 to 35.82

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Measure of depressive symptoms, Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ8). 8 items, Scale 0-3, Scoring average of responses 0-24. Higher score indicates greater depressive symptoms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
PRACTICE-DM
n=101 Participants
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying Persistently Poorly controlled Diabetes Mellitus (PPDM) - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing VHA Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources. PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
Standard VA Home Telehealth
n=99 Participants
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring. Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Patient Health Questionnaire-8
4.64 score on a scale
Interval 3.62 to 5.66
5.80 score on a scale
Interval 4.75 to 6.85

Adverse Events

PRACTICE-DM

Serious events: 15 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Standard VA Home Telehealth

Serious events: 14 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
PRACTICE-DM
n=101 participants at risk
PRACTICE-DM is a comprehensive telemedicine intervention that bundles telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression support - each of which targets a critical factor underlying PPDM - into a single, comprehensive program specifically developed for practical delivery using existing VHA Home Telehealth (HT) workforce, infrastructure, and technical resources. PRACTICE-DM: Five-component diabetes intervention: 1) telemonitoring; 2) self-management support; 3) diet/activity support; 4) medication management; and 5) depression support.
Standard VA Home Telehealth
n=99 participants at risk
Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring. Standard VA Home Telehealth: Standard VA HT care coordination and telemonitoring.
Cardiac disorders
Hospitalization
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
Endocrine disorders
Hospitalization
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
General disorders
Hospitalization
0.00%
0/101 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hospitalization
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
Infections and infestations
Hospitalization
0.00%
0/101 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
4.0%
4/99 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Hospitalization
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
Immune system disorders
Hospitalization
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
Nervous system disorders
Hospitalization
0.00%
0/101 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hospitalization
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
Psychiatric disorders
Hospitalization
0.00%
0/101 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hospitalization
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
Surgical and medical procedures
Hospitalization
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
Cardiac disorders
Important Medical Event
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
General disorders
Important Medical Event
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
Infections and infestations
Important Medical Event
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
Renal and urinary disorders
Important Medical Event
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Important Medical Event
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
Surgical and medical procedures
Important Medical Event
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
General disorders
Persistent or Significant Illness
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Persistent or Significant Illness
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term
0.00%
0/99 • Adverse events were collected with each patient contact and a systematic review with study outcome visits during the 12month participation.
Adverse Events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Term

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Matthew Crowley, MD

Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Phone: 919-286-0411

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place