Trial Outcomes & Findings for REALIsM-HF Pilot Study (NCT NCT03507439)
NCT ID: NCT03507439
Last Updated: 2023-07-03
Results Overview
Daily steps count was measured with DynaPort Move Monitor device and evaluated to reflect the amount of daily physical activity.
COMPLETED
NA
27 participants
At Day 9 and Day 77
2023-07-03
Participant Flow
The study was conducted at multiple centers in 3 countries between 06 APR 2018 (first participant first visit) and 12 MAR 2021 (last participant last visit).
Overall, 29 participants were screened, of which 2 participants were screening failures and 27 participants received at least one device.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
HFrEF
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
14
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
10
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
HFrEF
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=14 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=13 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
Total
n=27 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
64.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 • n=14 Participants
|
73.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 • n=13 Participants
|
69.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.0 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
13 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
4 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
10 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
6-minute walking distance (6MWD)
|
382 Meters (m)
n=12 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
291 Meters (m)
n=12 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
337 Meters (m)
n=24 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Quality of Life as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score
Total Symptom Score
|
64.0 Scores on a scale
n=7 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
33.0 Scores on a scale
n=7 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
61.0 Scores on a scale
n=14 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Quality of Life as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score
Clinical Summary Score
|
68.0 Scores on a scale
n=7 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
41.0 Scores on a scale
n=7 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
66.0 Scores on a scale
n=14 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Quality of Life as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score
Overall Summary Score
|
67.0 Scores on a scale
n=7 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
43.0 Scores on a scale
n=7 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
64.5 Scores on a scale
n=14 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Quality of Life as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score
Physical Limitation Score
|
71.0 Scores on a scale
n=7 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
54.0 Scores on a scale
n=7 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
65.0 Scores on a scale
n=14 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Copeptin
|
47.047 Picomoles per litre (pmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.744 • n=9 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
31.551 Picomoles per litre (pmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.693 • n=8 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
39.755 Picomoles per litre (pmol/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.960 • n=17 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Galectin-3
|
15.622 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.403 • n=9 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
12.265 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.988 • n=8 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
14.042 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.621 • n=17 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF 15)
|
4740.2 Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4840.0 • n=9 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
2689.6 Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1512.6 • n=8 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
3775.2 Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3718.5 • n=17 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Human interleukin-1 Receptor 4 / ST2
|
35.09 Picograms per litre (pg/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.33 • n=9 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
28.69 Picograms per litre (pg/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.45 • n=8 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
32.08 Picograms per litre (pg/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.20 • n=17 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Human Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding
|
311.6 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 241.0 • n=8 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
289.0 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 109.7 • n=3 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
305.5 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 207.8 • n=11 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
N-terminal propeptide of BNP (NT-proBNP)
|
11972.4 Nanograms per liter (ng/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20747.7 • n=9 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
2927.4 Nanograms per liter (ng/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3742.5 • n=7 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
8015.3 Nanograms per liter (ng/L)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16020.7 • n=16 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
High sensitive Troponin T
|
58.58 Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 46.30 • n=9 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
22.73 Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.99 • n=7 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
42.89 Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.74 • n=16 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Blood pressure
SBP
|
114.0 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.6 • n=11 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
124.0 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5 • n=12 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
119.2 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.9 • n=23 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Blood pressure
DBP
|
69.3 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9 • n=11 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
66.3 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.0 • n=12 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
67.7 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=23 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Heart rate
|
69.5 Beats per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=11 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
78.7 Beats per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.0 • n=12 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
74.3 Beats per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5 • n=23 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Interventricular septal wall thickness
|
10.377 Millimeters (mm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.178 • n=11 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
11.974 Millimeters (mm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.478 • n=10 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
11.138 Millimeters (mm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.589 • n=21 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Diameter of the left ventricle in diastole
|
64.085 Millimeters (mm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.074 • n=13 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
48.369 Millimeters (mm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.001 • n=10 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
57.252 Millimeters (mm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.271 • n=23 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Diameter of the left ventricle in systole
|
55.278 Millimeters (mm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.119 • n=9 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
32.778 Millimeters (mm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.302 • n=9 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
44.028 Millimeters (mm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.906 • n=18 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume
|
224.480 Milliliter (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 42.473 • n=10 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
89.846 Milliliter (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.972 • n=7 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
169.042 Milliliter (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 77.285 • n=17 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Left ventricular end-systolic volume
|
151.61 Milliliter (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.46 • n=11 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
41.49 Milliliter (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.37 • n=7 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
108.78 Milliliter (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 61.37 • n=18 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Left ventricular ejection fraction
|
28.54 Percentage of the volumn of blood
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.83 • n=13 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
53.56 Percentage of the volumn of blood
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.58 • n=10 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
39.42 Percentage of the volumn of blood
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.11 • n=23 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Left atrial end-systolic volume
|
115.708 Milliliter (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 56.175 • n=12 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
86.517 Milliliter (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.065 • n=7 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
104.954 Milliliter (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 47.959 • n=19 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Left atrial end systolic volume index
|
60.4508 Milliliter per square meter (mL/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.8365 • n=12 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
44.5747 Milliliter per square meter (mL/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.0789 • n=7 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
54.6017 Milliliter per square meter (mL/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.7688 • n=19 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Mitral peak velocity of late filling (A)
|
54.89 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.64 • n=7 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
76.69 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.44 • n=8 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
66.51 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.23 • n=15 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Mitral peak velocity of early filling (E)
|
86.98 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 40.43 • n=8 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
65.56 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.50 • n=10 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
75.08 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.13 • n=18 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Mitral lateral annulus early diastolic peak velocity
|
8.899 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.634 • n=8 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
9.114 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.991 • n=8 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
9.006 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.217 • n=16 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Mitral septal annulus early diastolic peak velocity
|
4.949 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.229 • n=8 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
12.139 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.744 • n=8 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
8.544 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.479 • n=16 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion
|
16.612 Millimeters (mm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.734 • n=13 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
18.295 Millimeters (mm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.178 • n=11 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
17.383 Millimeters (mm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.960 • n=24 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Pressure gradient of tricuspid valve
|
40.937 Millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.458 • n=12 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
53.038 Millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.335 • n=9 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
46.123 Millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.771 • n=21 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Right atrial mean pressure
|
8.8 Millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7 • n=10 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
5.4 Millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2 • n=9 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
7.2 Millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2 • n=19 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Number of participants per NYHA classification
NYHA Class II
|
6 Participants
n=13 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
2 Participants
n=12 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
8 Participants
n=25 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
|
Number of participants per NYHA classification
NYHA Class III
|
7 Participants
n=13 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
10 Participants
n=12 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
17 Participants
n=25 Participants • Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data for this evaluation
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9 and Day 77Population: Device set (DES): All participants with DynaPort parameters for least one wearing period
Daily steps count was measured with DynaPort Move Monitor device and evaluated to reflect the amount of daily physical activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=7 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=8 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Daily Steps Count
Day 9
|
5052 Steps
Standard Deviation 3090
|
3509 Steps
Standard Deviation 1871
|
|
Daily Steps Count
Day 77
|
6627 Steps
Standard Deviation 3851
|
2524 Steps
Standard Deviation 1606
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9 and Day 77Population: Device set (DES): All participants with DynaPort parameters for least one wearing period
Movement intensity of an activity, which was the average body acceleration (g) during this activity, was measured with DynaPort Move Monitor device and evaluated as daily physical activity level (PAL). Higher values indicate higher physical activity level and intensity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=7 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=8 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Daily Physical Activity Level
Day 9
|
1.612 Meter*second^-2 (m*s^-2)
Standard Deviation 0.135
|
1.606 Meter*second^-2 (m*s^-2)
Standard Deviation 0.138
|
|
Daily Physical Activity Level
Day 77
|
1.678 Meter*second^-2 (m*s^-2)
Standard Deviation 0.153
|
1.586 Meter*second^-2 (m*s^-2)
Standard Deviation 0.144
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9 and Day 77Population: Device set (DES): All participants with DynaPort parameters for least one wearing period
Total daily energy expenditure was measured with DynaPort Move Monitor device and evaluated to reflect the amount of daily physical activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=7 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=8 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Total Daily Energy Expenditure
Day 9
|
2445 Kilocalorie (kcal)
Standard Deviation 378
|
2380 Kilocalorie (kcal)
Standard Deviation 557
|
|
Total Daily Energy Expenditure
Day 77
|
2374 Kilocalorie (kcal)
Standard Deviation 322
|
2329 Kilocalorie (kcal)
Standard Deviation 494
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9 and Day 77Population: Device set (DES): All participants with DynaPort parameters for least one wearing period
Duration of daily physical activity was measured with DynaPort Move Monitor device.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=7 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=8 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Daily Physical Activity
Active Time - Day 77
|
5.043 Hours
Standard Deviation 1.578
|
3.861 Hours
Standard Deviation 2.796
|
|
Duration of Daily Physical Activity
Active Time - Day 9
|
4.157 Hours
Standard Deviation 1.631
|
3.843 Hours
Standard Deviation 1.886
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9 and Day 77Population: Device set (DES): All participants with DynaPort parameters for least one wearing period
Time duration per activity status was measured with DynaPort Move Monitor device and evaluated to reflect the intensity of daily physical activity. Physical Activity intensities use absolute aerobic intensity in terms of Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET), which is a physiological concept expressing the energy cost of a physical activity as a multiple of Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR). By convention, 1 MET is considered as the resting metabolic rate obtained during quiet sitting. According to the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) thresholds for adults: Light-intensity activities are defined as 1.1 MET to 2.9 METs; Moderate-intensity activities are defined as 3.0 to 5.9 METs; Vigorous-intensity activities are defined as 6.0 METs or more.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=7 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=8 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time Duration Per Activity Status
Time in Sedentary State - Day 9
|
20.957 Hours
Standard Deviation 1.180
|
21.196 Hours
Standard Deviation 1.346
|
|
Time Duration Per Activity Status
Time in Sedentary State - Day 77
|
20.415 Hours
Standard Deviation 1.457
|
21.203 Hours
Standard Deviation 1.402
|
|
Time Duration Per Activity Status
Time in Light Activity State - Day 9
|
1.156 Hours
Standard Deviation 0.632
|
1.275 Hours
Standard Deviation 0.779
|
|
Time Duration Per Activity Status
Time in Light Activity State - Day 77
|
1.586 Hours
Standard Deviation 0.723
|
1.415 Hours
Standard Deviation 1.043
|
|
Time Duration Per Activity Status
Time in Moderate Activity State - Day 9
|
1.365 Hours
Standard Deviation 0.515
|
1.194 Hours
Standard Deviation 0.459
|
|
Time Duration Per Activity Status
Time in Moderate Activity State - Day 77
|
1.471 Hours
Standard Deviation 0.397
|
0.995 Hours
Standard Deviation 0.500
|
|
Time Duration Per Activity Status
Time in Vigorous Activity State - Day 9
|
0.181 Hours
Standard Deviation 0.355
|
0.033 Hours
Standard Deviation 0.036
|
|
Time Duration Per Activity Status
Time in Vigorous Activity State - Day 77
|
0.357 Hours
Standard Deviation 0.562
|
0.019 Hours
Standard Deviation 0.022
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 84Population: Due to non-compatibility of systems, data could not be derived from the VitalPatch biosensor at the time of report preparation.
Amount of daily physical activity was collected and measured with VitalPatch biosensor.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 84Population: Due to non-compatibility of systems, data could not be derived from the VitalPatch biosensor at the time of report preparation.
Duration of daily physical activity was collected and measured with VitalPatch biosensor.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 84Population: Due to non-compatibility of systems, data could not be derived from the VitalPatch biosensor at the time of report preparation.
Intensity of daily physical activity was collected and measured with VitalPatch biosensor.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data for this assessment
6-minute walking distance (6MWD) is a exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity. An increase in the distance walked indicates improvement in basic mobility.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=9 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=10 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
6-minute Walking Distance (6MWD)
|
456 Meters
Interval 251.0 to 828.0
|
261 Meters
Interval 92.0 to 414.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 84Population: No participant in device set (DES) with evaluable data for this evaluation
Sleep movements was measured with DynaPort Move Monitor device.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 84Population: No participant in device set (DES) with evaluable data for this evaluation
Sleep patterns was measured with DynaPort Move Monitor device.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 84Population: No participant in device set (DES) with evaluable data for this evaluation
Sit-to-stand behaviour was measured with DynaPort Move Monitor device.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9 and Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data on each evaluation day for this assessment
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is the leading health-related quality-of-life measure for patients with heart failure (HF). It is a 23-item questionnaire that independently measures the impact of patients' HF, or its treatment, on 7 distinct domains: symptom frequency, symptom burden, physical limitation, quality of life, social limitations, self-efficacy and symptoms stability. Physical Limitation ranges 0-100. Total Symptom Score (range 0-100) combines the Symptom Frequency and the Symptom Burden scores; Clinical Summary Score (range 0-100) combines the Total Symptom and Physical Limitation scores to replicate the NYHA classification; Overall Summary Score (range 0-100) includes the Total Symptom, Physical Limitation, Social Limitations, and Quality of Life scores. Higher scores indicate more favorable states.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=12 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=12 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Score
Clinical Summary Score - Day 84
|
67.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 52.0 to 100.0
|
36.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 9.0 to 48.0
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Score
Total Symptom Score - Day 84
|
75.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 55.0 to 100.0
|
39.5 Scores on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 65.0
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Score
Total Symptom Score - Day 9
|
75.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 48.0 to 100.0
|
48.5 Scores on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 71.0
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Score
Clinical Summary Score - Day 9
|
69.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 45.0 to 100.0
|
40.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 56.0
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Score
Overall Summary Score - Day 9
|
57.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 38.0 to 92.0
|
39.5 Scores on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 70.0
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Score
Overall Summary Score - Day 84
|
62.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 42.0 to 100.0
|
36.5 Scores on a scale
Interval 6.0 to 51.0
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Score
Physical Limitation Score - Day 9
|
71.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 42.0 to 79.0
|
34.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 6.0 to 46.0
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Score
Physical Limitation Score - Day 84
|
73.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 29.0 to 100.0
|
28.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 13.0 to 38.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9 and Day 77Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data on each evaluation day for this assessment
REALIsM-HF exploratory daily questionnaire was developed to include patient-reported outcome (PRO) items that can be administered as a daily diary in the study. Overall activity score ranges from 0 to 240 and general physical activity score ranges from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate more favorable states.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=11 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=10 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the PRO - Activity Scores
Overall Activity Score - Day 9
|
75.909 Scores on a scale
Interval 49.89 to 198.08
|
107.708 Scores on a scale
Interval 70.0 to 145.17
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the PRO - Activity Scores
Overall Activity Score - Day 77
|
108.486 Scores on a scale
Interval 27.73 to 224.0
|
106.700 Scores on a scale
Interval 86.75 to 121.93
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the PRO - Activity Scores
General Physical Activity Score - Day 9
|
1.70000 Scores on a scale
Interval 0.8889 to 2.3333
|
1.66667 Scores on a scale
Interval 0.75 to 2.7778
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the PRO - Activity Scores
General Physical Activity Score - Day 77
|
1.48413 Scores on a scale
Interval 0.3636 to 2.5556
|
1.53333 Scores on a scale
Interval 1.25 to 1.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9 and Day 77Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data on each evaluation day for this assessment
REALIsM-HF exploratory daily questionnaire was developed to include patient-reported outcome (PRO) items that can be administered as a daily diary in the study. Answers to question "How have your physical activities changed since you were discharged from the hospital": 1= Very much more physically active; 2= Much more physically active; 3= A little more physically active; 4= No change in physical activities; 5= A little less physically active; 6= Much less physically active; 7= Very much less physically active. Answers to questions "How has your feeling of tiredness changed since you were discharged from the hospital", "How has your shortness of breath changed since you were discharged from the hospital" and "How has your swelling in your legs, ankles, or feet changed since you were discharged from the hospital": 1= Very much improved; 2= Much improved; 3= Minimally improved; 4= No change; 5= Minimally worse; 6= Much worse; 7= Very much worse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=11 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=10 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the PRO - Change in Activities and Symptoms
How Have Your Physical Activities Changed Since Discharged from Hospital - Day 9
|
2.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 6.0
|
4.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 7.0
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the PRO - Change in Activities and Symptoms
How Have Your Physical Activities Changed Since Discharged from Hospital - Day 77
|
3.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 6.0
|
4.5 Scores on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 7.0
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the PRO - Change in Activities and Symptoms
How Has Your Feeling of Tiredness Changed Since Discharged from Hospital - Day 9
|
2.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 4.0
|
4.5 Scores on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 7.0
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the PRO - Change in Activities and Symptoms
How Has Your Feeling of Tiredness Changed Since Discharged from Hospital - Day 77
|
2.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 4.0
|
4.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 6.0
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the PRO - Change in Activities and Symptoms
How Has Your Shortness of Breath Changed Since Discharged from Hospital - Day 9
|
2.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 6.0
|
4.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 6.0
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the PRO - Change in Activities and Symptoms
How Has Your Shortness of Breath Changed Since Discharged from Hospital - Day 77
|
2.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 6.0
|
4.5 Scores on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 7.0
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the PRO - Change in Activities and Symptoms
How Has Your Swelling in Your Legs, Ankles, or Feet Changed Since Discharged from Hospital - Day 9
|
4.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
3.5 Scores on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 7.0
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured With the PRO - Change in Activities and Symptoms
How Has Your Swelling in Your Legs, Ankles, or Feet Changed Since Discharged from Hospital - Day 77
|
2.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 4.0
|
4.0 Scores on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 6.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9 and Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data on each evaluation day for this assessment
Blood sample for biomarkers including Copeptin were collected from participants in order to validate such biomarkers for clinical use in the context of heart failure. Biomarkers concentration was determined in plasma/serum by a central laboratory using validated assays platforms including appropriate quality controls.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=14 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=13 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Copeptin
Day 9
|
41.553 Picomoles per litre (pmol/L)
Standard Deviation 36.802
|
29.457 Picomoles per litre (pmol/L)
Standard Deviation 25.633
|
|
Copeptin
Day 84
|
31.743 Picomoles per litre (pmol/L)
Standard Deviation 19.022
|
34.221 Picomoles per litre (pmol/L)
Standard Deviation 23.304
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9 and Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data on each evaluation day for this assessment
Blood sample for biomarkers including Galectin-3 were collected from participants in order to validate such biomarkers for clinical use in the context of heart failure. Biomarkers concentration was determined in plasma/serum by a central laboratory using validated assays platforms including appropriate quality controls.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=14 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=13 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Galectin-3
Day 9
|
16.736 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 10.883
|
14.461 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 6.036
|
|
Galectin-3
Day 84
|
12.637 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 8.082
|
17.947 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 14.908
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9 and Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data on each evaluation day for this assessment
Blood sample for biomarkers including GDF 15 were collected from participants in order to validate such biomarkers for clinical use in the context of heart failure. Biomarkers concentration was determined in plasma/serum by a central laboratory using validated assays platforms including appropriate quality controls.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=14 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=13 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF 15)
Day 9
|
5297.4 Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation 6452.6
|
1987.7 Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation 913.7
|
|
Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF 15)
Day 84
|
2796.8 Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation 1942.1
|
2333.3 Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation 1497.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9 and Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data on each evaluation day for this assessment
Blood sample for biomarkers including sST2 were collected from participants in order to validate such biomarkers for clinical use in the context of heart failure. Biomarkers concentration was determined in plasma/serum by a central laboratory using validated assays platforms including appropriate quality controls. Values above upper limit of quantification (ULOQ) were substituted by ULOQ for the calculation of statistics (ULOQ = 80.0)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=14 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=13 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Human Interleukin-1 Receptor 4 / ST2 (sST2)
Day 9
|
34.88 Picograms per litre (pg/L)
Standard Deviation 13.63
|
23.27 Picograms per litre (pg/L)
Standard Deviation 8.45
|
|
Human Interleukin-1 Receptor 4 / ST2 (sST2)
Day 84
|
26.13 Picograms per litre (pg/L)
Standard Deviation 21.51
|
24.35 Picograms per litre (pg/L)
Standard Deviation 9.98
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9 and Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data on each evaluation day for this assessment
Blood sample for biomarkers including IGFBP7 were collected from participants in order to validate such biomarkers for clinical use in the context of heart failure. Biomarkers concentration was determined in plasma/serum by a central laboratory using validated assays platforms including appropriate quality controls.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=13 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=10 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Human Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding (IGFBP7)
Day 84
|
228.8 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 49.5
|
242.5 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 98.8
|
|
Human Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding (IGFBP7)
Day 9
|
293.9 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 156.4
|
256.5 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 112.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9 and Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data on each evaluation day for this assessment
Blood sample for biomarkers including NT-proBNP were collected from participants in order to validate such biomarkers for clinical use in the context of heart failure. Biomarkers concentration was determined in plasma/serum by a central laboratory using validated assays platforms including appropriate quality controls.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=14 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=13 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
N-terminal Propeptide of BNP (NT-proBNP)
Day 84
|
3660.0 Nanograms per liter (ng/L)
Standard Deviation 3463.7
|
2746.6 Nanograms per liter (ng/L)
Standard Deviation 3395.6
|
|
N-terminal Propeptide of BNP (NT-proBNP)
Day 9
|
10985.4 Nanograms per liter (ng/L)
Standard Deviation 22390.8
|
2051.7 Nanograms per liter (ng/L)
Standard Deviation 2434.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9 and Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data on each evaluation day for this assessment
Blood sample for biomarkers including hsTRT were collected from participants in order to validate such biomarkers for clinical use in the context of heart failure. Biomarkers concentration was determined in plasma/serum by a central laboratory using validated assays platforms including appropriate quality controls. Values below lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were substituted by 1/2 LLOQ for the calculation of statistics (LLOQ = 13.0)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=14 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=13 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
High Sensitive Troponin T (hsTRT)
Day 9
|
46.56 Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation 35.00
|
24.70 Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation 5.98
|
|
High Sensitive Troponin T (hsTRT)
Day 84
|
33.82 Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation 25.85
|
27.00 Picograms per millilitre (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation 8.40
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9, Day 77 and Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data on each evaluation day for this assessment
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were collected.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=14 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=13 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood Pressure
DBP - Day 77
|
63.9 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.6
|
64.5 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 12.8
|
|
Blood Pressure
DBP - Day 84
|
70.0 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 12.2
|
65.1 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13.0
|
|
Blood Pressure
SBP - Day 9
|
108.1 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.6
|
128.8 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 18.6
|
|
Blood Pressure
SBP - Day 77
|
114.1 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 27.7
|
126.6 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.5
|
|
Blood Pressure
SBP - Day 84
|
117.6 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 15.2
|
124.5 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 12.5
|
|
Blood Pressure
DBP - Day 9
|
66.3 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10.7
|
72.7 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9, Day 77 and Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data on each evaluation day for this assessment
Heart rate data were collected by electrocardiogram (ECG).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=14 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=13 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Heart Rate
Day 9
|
68.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 13.7
|
73.6 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 18.0
|
|
Heart Rate
Day 77
|
63.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 15.2
|
70.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 17.2
|
|
Heart Rate
Day 84
|
68.0 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 16.4
|
73.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 20.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data for this assessment
Interventricular septal wall thickness was measured by echocardiography.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Interventricular Septal Wall Thickness
|
13.317 Millimeters (mm)
Standard Deviation 4.667
|
12.578 Millimeters (mm)
Standard Deviation 0.899
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data for this assessment
Diameter of the left ventricle in diastole was measured by echocardiography.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diameter of the Left Ventricle in Diastole
|
64.465 Millimeters (mm)
Standard Deviation 12.425
|
47.705 Millimeters (mm)
Standard Deviation 4.003
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data for this assessment
Diameter of the left ventricle in systole was measured by echocardiography.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=5 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diameter of the Left Ventricle in Systole
|
53.318 Millimeters (mm)
Standard Deviation 13.067
|
35.133 Millimeters (mm)
Standard Deviation 5.369
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data for this assessment
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume was measured by echocardiography.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=5 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume
|
219.667 Milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 83.868
|
97.000 Milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 23.130
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data for this assessment
Left ventricular end-systolic volume was measured by echocardiography.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=5 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume
|
154.83 Milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 66.02
|
51.60 Milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 29.10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data for this assessment
Left ventricular ejection fraction was measured by echocardiography.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=5 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
|
28.33 Percentage of the volume of blood
Standard Deviation 10.97
|
48.80 Percentage of the volume of blood
Standard Deviation 15.91
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data for this assessment
Left atrial end-systolic volume was measured by echocardiography.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=5 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Left Atrial End-systolic Volume
|
109.200 Milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 30.310
|
76.833 Milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 27.549
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data for this assessment
Left atrial end systolic volume index was measured by echocardiography.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=5 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Left Atrial End Systolic Volume Index
|
55.6008 Milliliter per square meter (mL/m^2)
Standard Deviation 17.9289
|
38.9653 Milliliter per square meter (mL/m^2)
Standard Deviation 18.0952
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data for this assessment
Mitral peak velocity of early filling (E) was measured by echocardiography.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=4 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mitral Peak Velocity of Early Filling (E)
|
81.28 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
Standard Deviation 40.45
|
78.53 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
Standard Deviation 29.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data for this assessment
Mitral peak velocity of late filling (A) was measured by echocardiography.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=4 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=4 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mitral Peak Velocity of Late Filling (A)
|
64.43 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
Standard Deviation 23.98
|
67.23 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
Standard Deviation 29.77
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data for this assessment
Mitral lateral annulus early diastolic peak velocity was measured by echocardiography.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=4 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mitral Lateral Annulus Early Diastolic Peak Velocity
|
8.625 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
Standard Deviation 2.266
|
8.623 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
Standard Deviation 2.781
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data for this assessment
Mitral septal annulus early diastolic peak velocity was measured by echocardiography.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=4 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mitral Septal Annulus Early Diastolic Peak Velocity
|
7.418 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
Standard Deviation 3.296
|
6.267 Centimeter per second (cm/sec)
Standard Deviation 2.555
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data for this assessment
Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion was measured by echocardiography.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion
|
17.833 Millimeters (mm)
Standard Deviation 2.483
|
19.000 Millimeters (mm)
Standard Deviation 2.898
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data for this assessment
Pressure gradient of tricuspid valve was measured by echocardiography.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pressure Gradient of Tricuspid Valve
|
35.793 Millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 15.524
|
30.982 Millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10.333
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data for this assessment
Right atrial mean pressure was measured by echocardiography.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=4 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=6 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Right Atrial Mean Pressure
|
9.0 Millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 6.9
|
5.8 Millimetre of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 4.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 84Population: Due to non-compatibility of systems, data could not be derived from the VitalPatch biosensor at the time of report preparation.
Heart rate variability (HRV) derived from ECG were measured with AVIVO MPM and VitalPatch biosensor
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 9 and Day 84Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS, all participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device) with evaluable data on each evaluation day for this assessment
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. The Stages of Heart Failure: Class I = No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs etc. Class II = Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. Class III = Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20 - 100 m). Comfortable only at rest. Class IV = Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=14 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=13 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Per NYHA Classification by Visit
Day 9 · NYHA CLASS III
|
2 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Per NYHA Classification by Visit
Day 84 · NYHA CLASS I
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Per NYHA Classification by Visit
Day 9 · NYHA CLASS I
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Per NYHA Classification by Visit
Day 9 · NYHA CLASS II
|
9 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Per NYHA Classification by Visit
Day 84 · NYHA CLASS II
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Per NYHA Classification by Visit
Day 84 · NYHA CLASS III
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: From signing the ICF until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants that were enrolled into the study and that wore at least one device
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. An AE may or may not be temporally or causally associated with the use of a medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly and another medical important serious event as judged by the investigator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=14 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=13 Participants
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Any SAE
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Any AE
|
9 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
Adverse Events
HFrEF
HFpEF
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=14 participants at risk
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=13 participants at risk
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
21.4%
3/14 • Number of events 3 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure chronic
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Hydrocele
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia legionella
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Klebsiella sepsis
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteitis
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Mitral valve repair
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
HFrEF
n=14 participants at risk
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF ≤ 35%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
HFpEF
n=13 participants at risk
Participants with established diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF; EF ≥ 45%) wore the AVIVO MPM System or VitalPatch biosensor for 5 monitoring periods with patches applied on Day 0, 9, 16, 77 and 84; and the DynaPort Move Monitor belt for 2 monitoring periods with belts applied on Day 9 and Day 77.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiovascular disorder
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hyperthyroidism
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Thyroid mass
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tongue disorder
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
General disorders
Face oedema
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 2 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
23.1%
3/13 • Number of events 4 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Erysipelas
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fungal infection
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Investigations
Catheterisation cardiac
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rales
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin lesion
|
0.00%
0/14 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
7.7%
1/13 • Number of events 3 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Implantable defibrillator insertion
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
0.00%
0/13 • From signing the informed consent form (ICF) until follow-up visit (up to 7 months)
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60