Socket Preservation Procedure Studying Soft and Hard Tissue Outcomes

NCT03497403 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2018-04-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Two different surgical protocols for socket preservation were compared. Soft and hard tissue outcomes were measured clinically and radiographically at baseline and six months post operatively.

Conditions

  • Ridge Preservation
  • Bone Regeneration

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Socket preservation control

After a tooth was extracted, the adjacent gum tissue was fully reflected, bone graft (FDBA) and non-cross-linked barrier membrane (Bio-Gide) were applied to the defect. The site was stabilized with sutures. Patients were followed for 6 months post operatively.

PROCEDURE

Socket preservation experimental

After a tooth was extracted, the adjacent gum tissue was minimally reflected, bone graft (FDBA) and cross-linked barrier membrane (OssixPlus) were applied to the defect. The site was stabilized with sutures. Patients were followed for 6 months post operatively.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Valeant Pharmaceuticals

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • Harvard School of Dental Medicine

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Eli Machtei, DMD · Harvard School of Dental Med.

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-10-18
Primary Completion
2017-04-19
Completion
2017-09-29

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03497403 on ClinicalTrials.gov