Open Versus Closed Reduction of Mandibular Sub-Condylar Fractures

NCT03494309 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 70

Last updated 2018-04-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Patients with mandibular sub-condylar fractures underwent either either open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) or closed reduction with external fixation (CREF) and were followed up for 6 months to assess treatment adequacy with the hypothesis that ORIF is superior to CREF.

Conditions

  • Mandibular Fractures

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Open Reduction & Internal Fixation

Patients underwent surgery and the fractures were reduced under direct vision followed by internal fixation with titanium plates and screws

PROCEDURE

Closed Reduction & External Fixation

Patients underwent closed reduction of the fracture and external fixation by arch bars \& guided elastics

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • King Edward Medical University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-11-01
Primary Completion
2015-11-15
Completion
2015-11-15

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03494309 on ClinicalTrials.gov