Influence of 3D- vs. 4K-display System on Surgical Performance
NCT03445429 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 133
Last updated 2020-03-03
Summary
Modern display technique seems to optimize visualization in minimal-invasive surgery. Many systems are available right now with a fundamental difference between the passive polarizing 3-dimensional (3D) and 2-dimensional (2D) technique. Data seems to show a benefit for the 3D technique in the visualization of the operative field. This could lead to more precision in minimal-invasive surgery. 2D-systems with high resolution of 4.096 x 2.180 pixels (4K) could be a promising alternative. This study wants to evaluate if 3D- or 4K- display technique could optimize surgeons´ view and improve the performance during minimal-invasive surgery. Therefore medical students and surgeons of different experience levels will perform surgical tasks on a minimal-invasive training system.They will be randomized to use first the 3D- or the 4K-display system in the training set-up. After completing the tasks with one system the minimal-invasive training set-up will be repeated with the other display system. NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) task load index is evaluated after each round. The ability for stereoscopic vision is tested after finishing the complete training set-up with both systems. The primary outcome parameter surgical performance will be evaluated in this study defined as the performance time and the number of defined mistakes made during each task.
Conditions
- Surgical Performance
Interventions
- OTHER
-
3D-display system
The subjects will perform tasks on a minimal-invasive/laparoscopic training set-up. They will perform the tasks with a 3D-display system or a 4K-display system. The intervention type 3D-display system means that the training-set up is performed first with 3D-display system an after that with the 4K-display system.
- OTHER
-
4K-display system
The subjects will perform tasks on a minimal-invasive/laparoscopic training set-up. They will perform the tasks with a 3D-display system or a 4K-display system. The intervention type 4K-display system means that the training-set up is performed first with 4K-display system and after that with the 3D-display system.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Universitätsklinikum Köln
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Roger Wahba, MD, PhD · Universitätsklinikum Köln
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-02-28
- Primary Completion
- 2019-10-04
- Completion
- 2020-02-24
Countries
- Germany
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparative Ergonomic Analysis of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT01903577 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Proficiency-based Versus Free Laparoscopic Training in Cholecystectomy on a Virtual Reality Simulator
NCT01615549 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
3D-HD Optic Systems Influence Surgical Performance
NCT04185116 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Motion Capture as a Tool for the Assessment of Laparoscopic Performance
NCT04646304 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Effectiveness of 2D Versus 3D Basic Laparoscopic Skills Training
NCT03763903 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Training With Laser Guidance Trial
NCT02407483 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Virtual Reality Training by Novices on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Porcine Model
NCT00460980 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Detection of Position of Diaphragm During Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT03038061 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of da Vinci Simulator vs LapSim Simulator
NCT03079908 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Procedures With and Without the Aid of the AutoLap System- a Robotic Camera Holder
NCT02934542 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation in a Multimodal Structured Curriculum of Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT06579456 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of 2-Dimensional and 3-Dimensional Laparoscopic Visions
NCT01799577 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Decreasing Upper and Shoulder Pain After Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT01433874 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparative Evaluation of Simulator Based and Traditional In-surgery Laparoscopic Camera Training's Efficiency in Novices
NCT01092013 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Shared Mental Models and Technical Assessment in Video Assisted Thoracoscopy Surgery Lobectomies
NCT02999113 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Ischemic Conditioning Prior to Esophagectomy
NCT03896399 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcome-related Performance Evaluation Through Revision and Analysis of inTraoperative Events
NCT06655948 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
The Effect of the Steep Trendelenburg Position on Intraocular Pressure
NCT06440642 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Dry-lab Laparoscopic Training and Robotic Virtual Simulator
NCT04989881 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Physical Recovery After Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection
NCT04067349 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Audio Recording During Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT03425175 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cricopharyngeal Dysfunction and Esophageal Diverticulum
NCT03187925 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Thresholds of SLR Maneuver in Obese Patients
NCT06222177 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Physical and Mental Load in the Surgeon Performing Laparoscopic Tasks
NCT00311285 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Skills Acquisition on Different Laparoscopy Software
NCT06255080 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA