Trial Outcomes & Findings for Phase 2 Study of Brigatinib in Japanese Participants With Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (NCT NCT03410108)
NCT ID: NCT03410108
Last Updated: 2024-05-08
Results Overview
Confirmed ORR: Percentage of participants confirmed to have achieved complete response(CR) or partial response(PR) per Independent Review Committee(IRC) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST) version 1.1 after the initiation of study treatment(confirmed ≥4 weeks after initial response). CR(target lesion response): disappearance of all extranodal target lesions, all pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to \<10 mm in short axis. CR(non-target lesion response): disappearance of all extranodal nontarget lesions, all lymph nodes must be nonpathological in size(\<10 mm short axis) and normalization of tumor marker level. PR(target lesions): at least 30% decrease in sum of the longest diameters(SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference Baseline sum diameters. As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure was assessed and reported data only in the participants with at least 1 line of prior treatment(called as Main Cohort) of the Refractory Expansion Part.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
104 participants
From the start of study treatment up to confirmed CR or PR (Up to approximately 23 months)
2024-05-08
Participant Flow
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on prior anaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ALK-TKI) treatment or naïve (with no prior treatment with TKIs) took part in the study at 32 investigative sites in Japan from 29 January 2018 to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. The study is ongoing.
Participants enrolled in single arm in this study to receive brigatinib 90/180 mg. The first 9 participants were assessed for initial safety in 'Safety Evaluation Lead-in Part'. Once safety was confirmed, participants were further enrolled in same arm. Data for outcome measures were assessed based on treatment taken before screening: Main Cohort(at least 1 line of prior treatment); Sub-Cohort(with 2 prior ALK-TKIs treatment); TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort(no prior treatment).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Brigatinib 90 mg/180 mg
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 34 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
104
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Evaluation Lead-in Part
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
|
47
|
|
Overall Study
Refractory Expansion Part: Sub-Cohort
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
Refractory Expansion Part
|
63
|
|
Overall Study
All Refractory Participants
|
72
|
|
Overall Study
TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
|
32
|
|
Overall Study
Completed
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
104
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Brigatinib 90 mg/180 mg
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 34 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Ongoing
|
41
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Progressive Disease
|
58
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Brigatinib 90 mg/180 mg
n=104 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 34 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
54.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.32 • n=104 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
57 Participants
n=104 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
47 Participants
n=104 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Japan
|
104 Participants
n=104 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment up to confirmed CR or PR (Up to approximately 23 months)Population: Full Analysis Set-P (FAS-P) Population is a subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS) Population and included first 47 participants in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
Confirmed ORR: Percentage of participants confirmed to have achieved complete response(CR) or partial response(PR) per Independent Review Committee(IRC) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST) version 1.1 after the initiation of study treatment(confirmed ≥4 weeks after initial response). CR(target lesion response): disappearance of all extranodal target lesions, all pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to \<10 mm in short axis. CR(non-target lesion response): disappearance of all extranodal nontarget lesions, all lymph nodes must be nonpathological in size(\<10 mm short axis) and normalization of tumor marker level. PR(target lesions): at least 30% decrease in sum of the longest diameters(SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference Baseline sum diameters. As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure was assessed and reported data only in the participants with at least 1 line of prior treatment(called as Main Cohort) of the Refractory Expansion Part.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=47 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part
|
34.0 percentage of participants
Interval 20.864 to 49.313
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment up to Month 12Population: Participants from the FAS Population who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the TKI-Naïve Expansion Cohort.
12 months PFS rate was defined as the percentage of the participants who did not have PFS events (PD per IRC using RECIST version 1.1, or death by any cause) at 12 months after the start of study treatment. PD for target lesion: SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study (including baseline, if that is the smallest), the SLD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. PD for non-target lesion: unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis of percentage of participants who achieved PFS of 12 months. As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure was assessed and reported data only in the TKI-Naïve Expansion Cohort (participants with no prior treatment).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=32 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
12 Months Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate in the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Naïve Expansion Cohort
|
93.0 percentage of participants
Interval 79.2 to 97.75
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment up to confirmed CR or PR till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 (Up to approximately 32 months)Population: FAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. Number analyzed are the number of participants in each cohort. Data is reported per cohort, based on the previous treatment: All Refractory Participants including Main Cohort, Sub-cohort and Safety Lead-in Cohort and and no treatment: TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Confirmed ORR was defined as percentage of participants who were confirmed to have achieved CR or PR per an IRC using RECIST version 1.1 after initiation of study treatment (confirmed ≥4 weeks after initial response). CR for target lesion response: disappearance of all extranodal target lesions, all pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to \<10 mm in short axis. CR for non-target lesion response: disappearance of all extranodal nontarget lesions, all lymph nodes must be nonpathological in size (\<10 mm short axis) and normalization of tumor marker level. PR: at least a 30% decrease in SLD of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. As pre-specified in the protocol, the data for this outcome measure is reported based on previous treatment as: All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=104 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Confirmed ORR as Assessed by an IRC in All Refractory Participants and TKI-Naïve Expansion Cohort
All Refractory Participants
|
31.9 percentage of participants
Interval 21.442 to 43.986
|
|
Confirmed ORR as Assessed by an IRC in All Refractory Participants and TKI-Naïve Expansion Cohort
TKI-Naive Participants
|
96.9 percentage of participants
Interval 83.783 to 99.921
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of study treatment up to confirmed CR or PR till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 (Up to approximately 32 months)Population: Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Part and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort participants from FAS, included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. Number analyzed are the number of participants analyzed for each cohort. Data is reported for per cohort separately: Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Part and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Confirmed ORR was defined as the percentage of the participants who were confirmed to have achieved CR or PR per the investigator using RECIST version 1.1 after the initiation of study treatment (confirmed ≥4 weeks after initial response). CR for target lesion response: disappearance of all extranodal target lesions, all pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to \<10 mm in short axis. CR for non-target lesion response: disappearance of all extranodal nontarget lesions, all lymph nodes must be nonpathological in size (\<10 mm short axis) and normalization of tumor marker level. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure assessed and reports data per cohort: Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort. The Safety Evaluation Lead-in Part was excluded from the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=79 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Confirmed ORR as Assessed by the Investigator in Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, Safety Evaluation Lead-in Part, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Participants
|
38.3 percentage of participants
Interval 24.507 to 53.62
|
|
Confirmed ORR as Assessed by the Investigator in Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, Safety Evaluation Lead-in Part, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
TKI-Naive Participants
|
93.8 percentage of participants
Interval 79.193 to 99.234
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose at 8-week intervals through Cycle 15 (each cycle=28 days) and at 12-week intervals thereafter until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 (Up to approximately 32 months)Population: FAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. Only responders were analyzed for this outcome measure. Number analyzed are the number of responder population in each cohort. Data is reported for each cohort separately: Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Part; All Refractory Participants; TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
DOR was assessed by an IRC, per RECIST version 1.1. DOR was defined as the time between the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) and the first subsequent documentation of objective PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD for target lesion: SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study (including baseline, if that is the smallest), the SLD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. PD for non-target lesion: unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions. Only responders were analyzed for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure assessed and reports data per cohort: Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=54 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by an IRC in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Participants
|
11.8 months
Interval 5.5 to 16.4
|
|
Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by an IRC in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
All Refractory Participants
|
16.4 months
Interval 5.6 to
Upper limit of 95% confidence interval (CI) was not reached due to low number of responders with events.
|
|
Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by an IRC in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
TKI-Naive Participants
|
NA months
Interval 13.9 to
Median and upper limit of 95% CI were not reached due to low number of responders with events.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of the treatment up to disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever comes first till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 (Up to approximately 32 months)Population: Refractory participants from the FAS population, including participants who received at least one dose of the study drug had a history of prior ALK-TKI treatment to which they were refractory. FAS-P Population=subset of the FAS Population and included first 47 participants in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part. Number analyzed=number of participants in each cohort. Data is reported for each cohort separately: Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Part; All Refractory Participants.
PFS was assessed by an IRC, per RECIST version 1.1. PFS was defined as the time from the start of study treatment to the first documentation of objective PD or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD for target lesion: SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study (including baseline, if that is the smallest), the SLD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. PD for non-target lesion: unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions. This outcome measure reports the data in refractory participants only and data is reported per cohort separately for Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, and for All Refractory Participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=72 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by an IRC in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, and All Refractory Participants
Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Participants
|
7.3 months
Interval 3.7 to 9.3
|
|
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by an IRC in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, and All Refractory Participants
All Refractory Participants
|
7.5 months
Interval 5.5 to 9.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of the treatment up to disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever comes first till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 (Up to approximately 32 months)Population: Participants from the FAS Population who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the TKI-Naïve Expansion Cohort. Data is reported only for TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort in this outcome measure.
PFS was assessed by an IRC, per RECIST version 1.1. PFS was defined as the time from the start of study treatment to the first documentation of objective PD or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD for target lesion: SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study (including baseline, if that is the smallest), the SLD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. PD for non-target lesion: unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions. This outcome measure reports data only in the TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=32 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
PFS as Assessed by an IRC in the TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
|
NA months
Interval 15.7 to
Median and upper limit of 90% CI were not reached due to low number of participants with events.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of the treatment up to confirmed CR or PR or SD till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 (Up to approximately 32 months)Population: FAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. Number analyzed are the number of participants analyzed in each cohort. Data is reported per cohort separately: Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Part; All Refractory Participants; TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
DCR was assessed by an IRC, per RECIST version 1.1. DCR: percentage of participants confirmed to have achieved CR or PR or have best overall response of stable disease (SD), for 6 weeks or more after initiation of study drug. CR (target lesion): disappearance of all target lesions. CR (non-target lesions): the nontarget lesion(s) has fully resolved. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD (target lesion): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD (target lesion): SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study, the SLD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure assessed and reports data per cohort: Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=104 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Assessed by an IRC in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Participants
|
78.7 percentage of participants
Interval 64.336 to 89.297
|
|
Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Assessed by an IRC in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
All Refractory Participants
|
73.6 percentage of participants
Interval 61.897 to 83.305
|
|
Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Assessed by an IRC in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
TKI-Naive Participants
|
96.9 percentage of participants
Interval 83.783 to 99.921
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of the treatment up to confirmed CR or PR till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 (Up to approximately 32 months)Population: FAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. Only responders were analyzed for this outcome measure. Number analyzed are responder population in each cohort. Data is reported for each cohort separately: Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Part; All Refractory Participants; TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Time to response was assessed by an IRC, per RECIST version 1.1. and was defined as the time interval from the date of the first dose of study treatment until the initial observation of CR or PR for participants with confirmed CR/PR. CR(target lesion response):disappearance of all extranodal target lesions, all pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to \<10 mm in short axis. CR(non-target lesion response):disappearance of all extranodal nontarget lesions, all lymph nodes must be nonpathological in size (\<10 mm short axis) and normalization of tumor marker level. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure assessed and reports data per cohort: Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=54 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Time to Response as Assessed by an IRC in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Participants
|
1.922 months
Interval 1.25 to 9.23
|
|
Time to Response as Assessed by an IRC in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
All Refractory Participants
|
1.873 months
Interval 1.25 to 9.23
|
|
Time to Response as Assessed by an IRC in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
TKI-Naive Participants
|
1.840 months
Interval 0.95 to 12.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of the treatment up to death due to any cause till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 (Up to approximately 32 months)Population: FAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. FAS-P Population is a subset of the FAS Population and included first 47 participants in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part. Number analyzed are the number of participants analyzed in each cohort. Data is reported per cohort separately: Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Part; All Refractory Participants including Safety Lead-in Cohort; TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
OS is defined as the time interval from the date of the first dose of the study treatment until death due to any cause. As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure assessed and reports data per cohort: Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=104 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Survival (OS) as Assessed by an IRC in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Participants
|
NA months
Interval 14.8 to
Median and upper limit of 95% CI were not reached due to low number of participants with events.
|
|
Overall Survival (OS) as Assessed by an IRC in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
All Refractory Participants
|
NA months
Interval 21.7 to
Median and upper limit of 95% CI were not reached due to low number of participants with events.
|
|
Overall Survival (OS) as Assessed by an IRC in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
TKI-Naive Participants
|
NA months
Median, lower and upper limit of 95% CI were not reached due to low number of participants with events.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of the treatment up to confirmed CR or PR till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 (Up to approximately 32 months)Population: Participants from FAS, included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, with measurable CNS metastases at Baseline. FAS-P Population is a subset of the FAS Population and included first 47 participants in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part. Number analyzed are the number of participants analyzed for each cohort. Data is reported per cohort separately: Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Part; All Refractory Participants; TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Confirmed iORR was defined as the percentage of the participants who had achieved confirmed CR or PR in the intracranial CNS per modified RECIST version 1.1 as evaluated by an IRC after the initiation of study treatment. CR for target lesion: disappearance of all target lesions. CR for non-target lesions: the nontarget lesion(s) has fully resolved. PR for target lesion: at least a 30% decrease in SLD of target lesions, taking as reference the Baseline SLD. Additionally, progression of target lesions must not be present. As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure assessed and reports data per cohort: Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=19 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Intracranial Objective Response Rate (iORR) in Participants With Measurable Central Nervous System (CNS) Metastases at Baseline in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
Interval 3.185 to 65.086
|
|
Intracranial Objective Response Rate (iORR) in Participants With Measurable Central Nervous System (CNS) Metastases at Baseline in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
All Refractory Participants
|
21.4 percentage of participants
Interval 4.658 to 50.798
|
|
Intracranial Objective Response Rate (iORR) in Participants With Measurable Central Nervous System (CNS) Metastases at Baseline in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
TKI-Naive Participants
|
40.0 percentage of participants
Interval 5.274 to 85.337
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose at 8-week intervals through Cycle 15 (each cycle=28 days) and at 12-week intervals thereafter until intracranial disease progression or death due to any cause till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 (Up to approximately 32 months)Population: Participants from FAS, included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug, with measurable metastases at Baseline. Data was analyzed only for the responder population. Number analyzed are responder population in each cohort. Data is reported per cohort separately: Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Part; All Refractory Participants; TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
iDOR was assessed by an IRC, per modified RECIST version 1.1 and was defined as the time between first documentation of objective intracranial tumor response (CR or PR) and first subsequent documentation of objective intracranial PD or death due to any cause. Participants who had systemic PD without intracranial PD were censored. CR (target lesion): disappearance of all target lesions. CR (non-target lesions):the nontarget lesion(s) has fully resolved. PR (target lesion):at least a 30% decrease in SLD of target lesions, taking as reference Baseline SLD. Progression of target lesions must not be present. CNS PD (target lesions):at least a 20% increase in SLD of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD (or the baseline) and SLD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure assessed and reports data per cohort: Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=5 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Duration of Intracranial Response (iDOR) in Participants With Measurable CNS Metastases at Baseline in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-naive Expansion Cohort
Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Participants
|
4.6 months
Interval 3.7 to 5.4
|
|
Duration of Intracranial Response (iDOR) in Participants With Measurable CNS Metastases at Baseline in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-naive Expansion Cohort
All Refractory Participants
|
5.4 months
Interval 3.7 to
Upper limit of 95% CI was not reached due to low number of participants with events.
|
|
Duration of Intracranial Response (iDOR) in Participants With Measurable CNS Metastases at Baseline in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-naive Expansion Cohort
TKI-Naive Participants
|
9.7 months
Interval 5.6 to 13.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start of the treatment up to intracranial disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever comes first till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 (Up to approximately 32 months)Population: FAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. FAS-P Population is a subset of the FAS Population and included first 47 participants in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part. Number analyzed are the number of participants analyzed for each cohort. Data is reported for each cohort separately: Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Part; All Refractory Participants; TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
iPFS was assessed by an IRC, per modified RECIST version 1.1 and was defined as the time from the start of study treatment to the first documentation of objective intracranial PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The participant who had systemic PD and withdrawn from study without intracranial PD was censored. CNS PD for target lesions: at least a 20% increase in the SLD of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD (or the baseline, if the baseline is the nadir value) and the SLD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. PD for non-target lesions: the nontarget site of disease has shown unequivocal progression. As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure was assessed and reports data per cohort in all participants with measurable or not measurable intracranial metastases at Baseline: Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=104 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Intracranial Progression-free Survival (iPFS) in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Participants
|
NA months
Interval 9.2 to
Median and upper limit of 95% CI were not reached due to low number of participants with events.
|
|
Intracranial Progression-free Survival (iPFS) in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
All Refractory Participants
|
NA months
Interval 15.5 to
Median and upper limit of 95% CI were not reached due to low number of participants with events.
|
|
Intracranial Progression-free Survival (iPFS) in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
TKI-Naive Participants
|
NA months
Interval 15.7 to
Median and upper limit of 95% CI were not reached due to low number of participants with events.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the first dose up to last dose of study drug till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 (Up to approximately 32 months)Population: All Refractory Participants, TKI-Naive Participants: Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion: FAS-P Population is a subset of FAS including first 47 participants in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part. Number analyzed = participants in each cohort: Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Part; All Refractory Participants; TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Time on treatment was defined as the time interval from the first dose to the last dose of brigatinib. As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure assessed and reports data per cohort: Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=104 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Time on Treatment in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
Main Cohort of Refractory Expansion Participants
|
7.50 months
Interval 0.2 to 20.0
|
|
Time on Treatment in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
All Refractory Participants
|
8.20 months
Interval 0.2 to 22.4
|
|
Time on Treatment in the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part, All Refractory Participants, and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort
TKI-Naive Participants
|
13.80 months
Interval 0.4 to 19.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Refractory Expansion Participants: Baseline and Cycle 22 - each cycle was of 28 days; TKI-Naive Participants: Baseline and Cycle 19 - each cycle was of 28 daysPopulation: Refractory Expansion Part and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort participants from FAS, included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. Number analyzed are participants analyzed in each cohort for the specific category at the given timepoint. Data is reported for each cohort separately: Refractory Expansion Part; TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items - 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 9 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and a QOL scale. Out of 30, 28 questions had 4 response levels (not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much); 2 questions for global health status had score of 1 to 7 (very poor to excellent) to evaluate overall health and QOL. Each subscale raw score including global health status was transformed to a total score of 0 to 100. For functional scales, global health status scale, higher scores=better QOL (positive change from Baseline=improvement). For symptom scales, lower scores=better QOL (negative change from Baseline=improvement). As pre-specified in protocol, this outcome measure was assessed and reports data per cohort: Refractory Expansion Participants (including Main Cohort and Sub-Cohort), and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=95 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Global Health Status): Baseline
|
64.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Global Health Status): Change from Baseline at Cycle 22
|
-12.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 38.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Physical Functioning): Baseline
|
88.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Physical Functioning): Change From Baseline at Cycle 22
|
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Role Functioning): Baseline
|
85.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Role Functioning): Change From Baseline at Cycle 22
|
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Emotional Functioning): Baseline
|
87.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Emotional Functioning): Change From Baseline at Cycle 22
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Cognitive Functioning): Baseline
|
87.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.72
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Cognitive Functioning): Change From Baseline at Cycle 22
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Social Functioning): Baseline
|
86.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.97
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Social Functioning): Change From Baseline at Cycle 22
|
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Fatigue): Baseline
|
22.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.73
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Fatigue): Change from Baseline at Cycle 22
|
5.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Nausea and Vomiting): Baseline
|
4.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Nausea and Vomiting): Change from Baseline at Cycle 22
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Pain): Baseline
|
15.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.46
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Pain): Change from Baseline at Cycle 22
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Dyspnoea): Baseline
|
20.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.73
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Dyspnoea): Change from Baseline at Cycle 22
|
-8.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Insomnia): Baseline
|
17.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Insomnia): Change from Baseline at Cycle 22
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Appetite loss): Baseline
|
13.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Appetite loss): Change from Baseline at Cycle 22
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Constipation): Baseline
|
14.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.94
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Constipation): Change from Baseline at Cycle 22
|
8.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Diarrhoea): Baseline
|
5.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Diarrhoea): Change from Baseline at Cycle 22
|
24.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Financial Difficulties): Baseline
|
14.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Financial Difficulties): Change from Baseline at Cycle 22
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Global Health Status): Baseline
|
64.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Global Health Status):Change from Baseline at Cycle 19
|
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Physical Functioning): Baseline
|
88.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Physical Functioning): Change from Baseline at Cycle 19
|
-6.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Role Functioning): Baseline
|
81.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.89
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Role Functioning): Change From Baseline at Cycle 19
|
-11.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Emotional Functioning): Baseline
|
80.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Emotional Functioning): Change From Baseline at Cycle 19
|
6.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.72
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Cognitive Functioning): Baseline
|
88.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Cognitive Functioning): Change From Baseline at Cycle 19
|
-2.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Social Functioning): Baseline
|
77.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Social Functioning): Change From Baseline at Cycle 19
|
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Fatigue): Baseline
|
23.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Fatigue): Change From Baseline at Cycle 19
|
3.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.36
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Nausea and Vomiting): Baseline
|
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Nausea and Vomiting): Change From Baseline at Cycle 19
|
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.94
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Pain): Baseline
|
22.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Pain): Change from Baseline at Cycle 19
|
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Dyspnoea): Baseline
|
20.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Dyspnoea): Change from Baseline at Cycle 19
|
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.74
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Insomnia): Baseline
|
21.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Insomnia): Change from Baseline at Cycle 19
|
-10.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Appetite loss): Baseline
|
13.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.46
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Appetite loss): Change from Baseline at Cycle 19
|
-11.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.94
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Constipation): Baseline
|
9.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.35
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Constipation): Change from Baseline at Cycle 19
|
-5.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Diarrhoea): Baseline
|
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Diarrhoea): Change from Baseline at Cycle 19
|
5.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.84
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Financial Difficulties): Baseline
|
20.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Scores and Symptoms as Assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Financial Difficulties): Change from Baseline at Cycle 19
|
-11.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.04
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Refractory Expansion Participants: Baseline and Cycle 22 - each cycle was of 28 days; TKI-Naive Participants: Baseline and Cycle 19 - each cycle was of 28 daysPopulation: FAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. Number analyzed are participants analyzed in each cohort for the specific category at the given timepoint. Data is reported for each cohort separately: Refractory Expansion Part; TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
HRQOL scores was assessed with EORTC, its lung cancer module QLQ-LC13. QLQ-LC13 contains 13 questions (4-point scale where 1=Not at all \[best\] to 4=Very much \[worst\]) assessing lung cancer-associated symptoms \[cough, hemoptysis, dyspnea, and site-specific pain (chest, arm or shoulder, other parts)\], treatment-related side effects (sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, and alopecia), and use of pain medication. Subscale score range: 0 to 100. Higher symptom score = greater degree of symptom severity. As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure assessed and reports data per cohort only in the Refractory Expansion Participants (including Main Cohort and Sub-cohort), and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=95 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Dyspnea): Baseline
|
17.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.30
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Dyspnea):Change From Baseline at Cycle 22
|
-2.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Coughing): Baseline
|
32.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Coughing): Change From Baseline at Cycle 22
|
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 47.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Haemoptysis): Baseline
|
5.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Haemoptysis): Change From Baseline at Cycle 22
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Sore Mouth): Baseline
|
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Sore Mouth): Change From Baseline at Cycle 22
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Dysphagia): Baseline
|
3.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.76
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Dysphagia): Change From Baseline at Cycle 22
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Peripheral Neuropathy): Baseline
|
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Peripheral Neuropathy): Change From Baseline at Cycle 22
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Alopecia): Baseline
|
4.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.76
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Alopecia): Change From Baseline at Cycle 22
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Pain in Chest): Baseline
|
12.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Pain in Chest): Change From Baseline at Cycle 22
|
-8.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Pain in Arm or Shoulder): Baseline
|
10.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.72
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Pain in Arm or Shoulder): Change From Baseline at Cycle 22
|
8.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Pain in Other Parts): Baseline
|
11.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.82
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
Refractory Expansion Participants (Pain in Other Parts): Change From Baseline at Cycle 22
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Dyspnea): Baseline
|
16.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Dyspnea): Change From Baseline at Cycle 19
|
7.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.96
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Coughing): Baseline
|
36.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.84
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Coughing): Change From Baseline at Cycle 19
|
-11.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.30
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Haemoptysis): Baseline
|
3.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.77
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Haemoptysis): Change From Baseline at Cycle 19
|
-5.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Sore Mouth): Baseline
|
8.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Sore Mouth): Change From Baseline at Cycle 19
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.87
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Dysphagia): Baseline
|
7.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Dysphagia): Change From Baseline at Cycle 19
|
-5.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.84
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Peripheral Neuropathy): Baseline
|
8.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.39
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participant (Peripheral Neuropathy): Change From Baseline at Cycle 19
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.87
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Alopecia): Baseline
|
3.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.77
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Alopecia): Change From Baseline at Cycle 19
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.87
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Pain in Chest): Baseline
|
13.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Pain in Chest): Change From Baseline at Cycle 19
|
-11.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Pain in Arm or Shoulder): Baseline
|
15.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.87
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Pain in Arm or Shoulder): Change From Baseline at Cycle 19
|
-5.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.84
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Pain in Other Parts): Baseline
|
19.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.44
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 (QLQ-LC13) Subscale Score
TKI-Naive Participants (Pain in Other Parts): Change From Baseline at Cycle 19
|
5.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.47
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Refractory Expansion Participants: Cycle 22 - each cycle was of 28 days; TKI-Naive Participants: Cycle 19 - each cycle was of 28 daysPopulation: FAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. Number analyzed are participants analyzed in each cohort for the specific category at the given timepoint. Data is reported for each cohort separately: Refractory Expansion Part; TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
EQ-5D-5L comprises of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each rated on 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, 5= extremely severe problems. Higher scores indicated greater levels of problems across the five dimensions. As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure assessed and reports data per cohort only in the Refractory Expansion Participants (including Main Cohort and Sub-cohort), and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort. Number of participants with a particular score at the given timepoint is reported. Only categories with data are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=95 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Responses to HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score
Refractory Expansion Participants(Score=1, Pain: Have no pain or discomfort)
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Responses to HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score
Refractory Expansion Participants(Score=2, Pain: Have slight pain or discomfort)
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Responses to HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score
Refractory Expansion Participants(Score=1, Anxiety: Not anxious or depressed)
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Responses to HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score
TKI-Naive Participants(Score=1, Mobility: Have no problems walking)
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Responses to HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score
TKI-Naive Participants(Score=2, Mobility: Have slight problems walking)
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Responses to HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score
TKI-Naive Participants(Score=1, Selfcare: Have no problems washing/dressing myself)
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Responses to HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score
TKI-Naive Participants(Score=1, Activity: Have no problems doing my usual activities)
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Responses to HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score
TKI-Naive Participants(Score=1, Pain: Have no pain or discomfort)
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Responses to HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score
TKI-Naive Participants(Score=2, Pain: Have slight pain or discomfort)
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Responses to HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score
TKI-Naive Participants(Score=1, Anxiety: Not anxious or depressed)
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Responses to HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score
TKI-Naive Participants(Score=2,Anxiety: Slightly anxious or depressed)
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Responses to HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score
Refractory Expansion Participants(Score=1, Mobility: Have no problems walking)
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Responses to HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score
Refractory Expansion Participants(Score=1, Selfcare: Have no problems washing/dressing myself)
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Responses to HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol 5-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score
Refractory Expansion Participants(Score=1, Activity: Have no problems doing usual activities)
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Refractory Expansion Participants: Baseline and Cycle 22 - each cycle was of 28 days; TKI-Naive Participants: Baseline and Cycle 19 - each cycle was of 28 daysPopulation: FAS included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. Number analyzed are participants analyzed in each cohort at the given timepoint. Data is reported for each cohort separately: Refractory Expansion Part; TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20 centimeter (cm), vertical, visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure assessed and reports data per cohort only in the Refractory Expansion Participants (including Main Cohort and Sub-cohort), and TKI-Naive Expansion Cohort.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=95 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) Score
Refractory Expansion Participants: Baseline
|
72.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.65
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) Score
Refractory Expansion Participants: Change from Baseline to Cycle 22
|
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.93
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) Score
TKI-Naive Participants: Baseline
|
73.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in HRQOL Scores and Symptoms of Lung Cancer as Assessed With the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) Score
TKI-Naive Participants: Change from Baseline to Cycle 19
|
3.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.01
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose and at multiple time points (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24; up to 24 hrs) post-dose of Cycle 1 Days 1 and 22 (each cycle = 28 days)Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Population included participants with sufficient dosing and PK data to reliably estimate PK parameters as determined by the clinical pharmacologist for Safety Evaluation Lead-in Part.
As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure was assessed only in the participants with or without prior ALK-TKI treatment called as the Safety Evaluation Lead-in Part.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=9 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Brigatinib on Cycle 1 Days 1 and 22
Cycle 1 Day 1
|
414.0 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.2
|
|
Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Brigatinib on Cycle 1 Days 1 and 22
Cycle 1 Day 22
|
2119 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 62.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose and at multiple time points (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24; up to 24 hrs) post-dose of Cycle 1 Days 1 and 22 (each cycle = 28 days)Population: PK Population included participants with sufficient dosing and PK data to reliably estimate PK parameters as determined by the clinical pharmacologist for Safety Evaluation Lead-in Part.
As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure was assessed only in the participants with or without prior ALK-TKI treatment called as the Safety Evaluation Lead-in Part.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=9 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
Tmax: Time of First Occurrence of Cmax for Brigatinib on Cycle 1 Days 1 and 22
Cycle 1 Day 1
|
3.980 hour
Interval 1.02 to 7.88
|
|
Tmax: Time of First Occurrence of Cmax for Brigatinib on Cycle 1 Days 1 and 22
Cycle 1 Day 22
|
2.080 hour
Interval 1.12 to 6.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose and at multiple time points (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24; up to 24 hrs) post-dose of Cycle 1 Days 1 and 22 (each cycle = 28 days)Population: PK Population included participants with sufficient dosing and PK data to reliably estimate PK parameters as determined by the clinical pharmacologist for Safety Evaluation Lead-in Part. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
As pre-specified in the protocol, this outcome measure was assessed only in the participants with or without prior ALK-TKI treatment called as the Safety Evaluation Lead-in Part.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Refractory Expansion Part: Main Cohort
n=9 Participants
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 31 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020. Participants who had previously received only alectinib or both alectinib and crizotinib formed a part of the Main Cohort of the Refractory Expansion Part.
|
|---|---|
|
AUC(0-24): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose for Brigatinib on Cycle 1 Days 1 and 22
Cycle 1 Day 1
|
5045 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 48.4
|
|
AUC(0-24): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose for Brigatinib on Cycle 1 Days 1 and 22
Cycle 1 Day 22
|
31130 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 60.0
|
Adverse Events
Brigatinib 90 mg/180 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Brigatinib 90 mg/180 mg
n=104 participants at risk
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 34 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020.
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac tamponade
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Stress cardiomyopathy
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
3.8%
4/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hepatic infection
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia bacterial
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haematoma
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Amylase increased
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood insulin increased
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Lipase increased
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pericarditis malignant
|
1.9%
2/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Adenosquamous cell carcinoma
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Brain cancer metastatic
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Rectal cancer
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
1.9%
2/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Brain oedema
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
|
7.7%
8/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
1.9%
2/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemoptysis
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lung disorder
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis migrans
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombosis
|
0.96%
1/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Brigatinib 90 mg/180 mg
n=104 participants at risk
Brigatinib 90 mg, tablets, orally, QD for first 7 days followed by brigatinib, 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 1 of 28 days followed by brigatinib 180 mg, tablets, orally, QD in Cycle 2 and onwards in 28-day cycles until investigator-assessed PD or intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation for any other reason, whichever comes first up to 34 cycles till data cut-off date: 29 September 2020.
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
6.7%
7/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
45.2%
47/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
32.7%
34/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
31.7%
33/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
16.3%
17/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
15.4%
16/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
18.3%
19/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
6.7%
7/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
|
9.6%
10/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
12.5%
13/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
11.5%
12/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
8.7%
9/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
77.9%
81/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
34.6%
36/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Lipase increased
|
33.7%
35/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Amylase increased
|
31.7%
33/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
23.1%
24/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
14.4%
15/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
6.7%
7/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased
|
5.8%
6/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
5.8%
6/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
|
10.6%
11/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
8.7%
9/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperuricaemia
|
6.7%
7/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
13.5%
14/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
10.6%
11/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
9.6%
10/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
16.3%
17/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
|
7.7%
8/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
6.7%
7/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
5.8%
6/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
7.7%
8/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
19.2%
20/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Photosensitivity reaction
|
13.5%
14/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
9.6%
10/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
47.1%
49/104 • From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapies, whichever comes first (Up to data cut-off date: 29 September 2020 [Up to approximately 32 months])
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The first study related publication will be a multi-center publication submitted within 24 months after conclusion or termination of a study at all sites. After such multi site publication, all proposed site publications and presentations will be submitted to sponsor for review 60 days in advance of publication. Site will remove Sponsor confidential information unrelated to study results. Sponsor can delay a proposed publication for another 60 days to preserve intellectual property.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER