Risk of Malignancy Index and Assiut Scoring Model for Adnexal Malignancy
NCT03404687 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 250
Last updated 2018-01-19
Summary
The presence of an adnexal mass is a frequent reason for a woman to be referred to a gynaecologist. The discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses is central to decisions regarding clinical management and surgical planning in such patients. Patients with malignant tumours should be referred to a gynaecological oncologist, as the quality of cytoreductive surgery and surgical staging/lymph node dissection are important prognostic factors in ovarian cancer. These specialized surgical procedures require the specific skills and experience provided by gynaecologic oncology surgeons. Furthermore, appropriate and timely referral to a gynaecologic oncologist has been proven to increase survival in patients with ovarian cancer.Conversely, patients believed to have a benign mass requiring surgery are able to have this performed by a general gynaecologist. A standardized method for preoperative identification of probable malignant masses would allow optimization of first-line treatment for women with ovarian cancer. A risk of malignancy index would be valuable for the selective referral of relevant patients to specialized oncology centres. Currently, clinical examination, ultrasound assessment, and assays of tumour markers are part of the standard work-up for an adnexal mass. Although none of these indicators alone is very sensitive or specific for detecting malignancy, an index developed by Jacobs et al. incorporates information about the patient's menopausal status and serum Cancer antigen A-125 levels, and ultrasound characteristics of the mass to predict the risk of malignancy with greater sensitivity and specificity than any one factor alone.Some of the potential advantages of risk malignant index include rapid triage of patients through the referral system and fewer operations for benign masses being performed by gynaecologic oncologists.
Conditions
- Risk Malignant Index
Interventions
- RADIATION
-
ultrasound
for assessment of adnexal masses size and pattern
- DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
-
cancer antigen 125 level
for prediction of malignancy
- RADIATION
-
Doppler
for detection of blood flow
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Assiut University
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2017-12-01
- Completion
- 2018-01-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Accuracy of the Characterization of Adnexal Masses, Indeterminate at Ultrasonography, Using a MRI Protocol Without Contrast: Validation of the Cambridge Score
NCT05815992 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Relation Between Body Mass Index and Endometrial Thickness
NCT03841916 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Doppler Ultrasound and CT Versus Laparoscopy in Assessment of Ovarian Malignancy
NCT06109545 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Different Modalities for the Evaluation of Patients With Peri-menopausal Bleeding
NCT07309692 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Validation of the ADNEX Model for Discrimination Between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses in Pregnancy: International Ovarian Tumour Analysis in Pregnancy Study (p-IOTA)
NCT05974618 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Uterine Artery Doppler Flow Velocimetry Parameters for Predicting the Occurrence of Persistent Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia After Evacuation of Complete Hydatiform Mole
NCT07333326 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Adenomyosis in Fertile Women in MUSA Criteria
NCT06250569 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Value of MRI in the Characterization of Ovarian Masses Unable to Classify With Ultrasound Using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules
NCT02836275 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Three-dimensional Power Doppler in the Diagnosis of Endometrial Lesions in Patients With Postmenopausal Bleeding
NCT03543592 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Uterine Cavity in Perimenopausal Women.
NCT06888414 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Fluoroscopic &Ultrasonographic Guidance of Superior Hypogastric Plexus Neurolysis in Intractable Pelvic Pain
NCT03606811 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Ovarian Cysts Using Machine Learning
NCT05342298 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Saline Sonohystrography and Office Hysteroscopy in Evaluation of Cases of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
NCT03135353 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Evaluation of the Role of MRI in Ovarian Masses During Pregnancy
NCT06635837 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Fibroid Mapping: A Cross Sectional Observational Study
NCT05505331 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of a Specialized Pro Forma in Assessing Morbidly Adherent Placenta With Correlation to Intra-operative Findings
NCT04938050 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Fluoroscopic Anterior Approach Versus Ultrasound Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Neurolysis in Cancer Pelvic Pain
NCT05299047 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
3D Placental Volume in Placenta Accreta
NCT06755047 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Ultrasound Elastography in Diffferentiation of Endometriomas and Hemorrhagic Cysts
NCT05104086 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound and Tumors Markers in Diagnosis of Complex Ovarian Cysts
NCT07005089 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Frequency of Performing Umbilical Artery Doppler in the Third Trimester in High Risk Pregnancy
NCT03584763 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Doppler to Diagnose Myometrial Masses
NCT01833871 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Role of Duplex Doppler in Accurate Diagnosis of Appendicitis
NCT04130074 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
CT-guided Ablation of the Ganglion Impar for Pelvic Tumors: Comparethe Addition of Ketorolac or Dexamethasone
NCT03789227 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sonohysterography , 3D Ultrasonography and Hysteroscopy in Assessment of Uterine Factor in Cases of Female Infertility
NCT02399501 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA