Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

NCT03394079 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 2008

Last updated 2026-01-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The primary aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of OCT-guided(optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided) and IVUS-guided(Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided) strategies in patients undergoing Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) or drug-coated balloons (only for in-stent restenosis) for significant obstructive Coronary artery disease (CAD).

The investigators hypothesize that OCT-guided PCI is non-inferior to IVUS-guided PCI with respect to primary end point of target-vessel failure (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction \[MI\], or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization \[TVR\]) at 1 year after randomization.

Conditions

  • Coronary Vessels

Interventions

PROCEDURE

PCI

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea

    collaborator OTHER
  • Seung-Jung Park

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Duk-woo Park, MD · Professor, Division of Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
19 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-04-12
Primary Completion
2023-02-17
Completion
2027-01-31

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03394079 on ClinicalTrials.gov