ULTRAsound-assisted Catheter vs. STAndaRd Catheter Thrombolysis for Submassive Pulmonary Embolism

NCT03389971 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 10

Last updated 2021-09-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) accounts for 5-10% of in-hospital deaths. Systemic anticoagulation (AC) is the standard of care and thrombolysis is recommended for those at a higher mortality risk. Catheter-directed therapies, mainly standard infusion catheter thrombolysis (CDT) and ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT), have been introduced as new more effective and safer treatment modalities. USAT is a modification of standard catheter lysis utilizing a system of local ultrasound to dissociate the fibrin matrix of the thrombus with simultaneous acoustic streaming of the thrombolytic agent, allowing more efficient thrombolysis. However, there is limited comparative effectiveness data against standard multi-side hole catheter infusion. More rapid clearance of pulmonary thrombus by USAT compared to standard CDT may prove to be clinically beneficial and cost effective. Alternatively, if thrombus clearance is similar, the cost of USAT may exceed the cost of CDT (equipment and disposables), without realization any advantage.

Conditions

  • Submassive Pulmonary Embolism

Interventions

PROCEDURE

catheter-directed thrombolysis

catheter-directed thrombolysis with commercially available multi-sidehole catheter or USAT catheter

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Piedmont Healthcare

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Charles Ross, MD · Piedmont Healthcare

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-12-06
Primary Completion
2020-04-01
Completion
2020-04-01

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03389971 on ClinicalTrials.gov