Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison of 1,550-nm Laser and Fractional Radiofrequency Microneedle for the Treatment of Acne Scars in Ethnic Skin (NCT NCT03380845)
NCT ID: NCT03380845
Last Updated: 2019-11-19
Results Overview
Improvement in acne scarring will be measured by two blinded evaluators both by in-person assessments and by photographic review (digital photography will be used under standardized conditions). A quartile grading scale (1 = 1% to 25%, 2 =26% to 50%, 3 =51% to 75%, 4 = \>76% improvement) will be used to measure acne scar improvement. Higher score means better outcome.
COMPLETED
NA
4 participants
three months after last treatment
2019-11-19
Participant Flow
Unit of analysis: side of the face treated
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Bilateral Facial Treatment With Fraxel and Fractora
Randomized treatment with Fraxel on one side of the face, and Fractora on the opposite side of the face - the study is a randomized, split-face study in subjects seeking facial acne scar correction. Subjects were treated with Fraxel on one side of the face and Fractora on the other side of the face. The side of the face for each device was randomly assigned.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
4 8
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
4 8
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Comparison of 1,550-nm Laser and Fractional Radiofrequency Microneedle for the Treatment of Acne Scars in Ethnic Skin
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Split Face Study Bilateral Fraxel Restore vs Fractora
n=8 side of the face treated
Randomized treatment with Fraxel Restore on one side of the face, and Fractora on the opposite side of the face - the study is a randomized,single-center, split-face study in subjects seeking acne scar correction. Subjects were treated with Fraxel on one side of the face and Fractora on the other side of the face. The side of the face for each device was randomly assigned.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
30 years
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
4 participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type (FST) Classification
FST III
|
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type (FST) Classification
FST VI
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: three months after last treatmentPopulation: There were 4 participants enrolled and treated, the participants received bilateral facial treatments with Fraxel on one side of the face, and Fractora on the other side of the face
Improvement in acne scarring will be measured by two blinded evaluators both by in-person assessments and by photographic review (digital photography will be used under standardized conditions). A quartile grading scale (1 = 1% to 25%, 2 =26% to 50%, 3 =51% to 75%, 4 = \>76% improvement) will be used to measure acne scar improvement. Higher score means better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fraxel Restore on One Side of the Face
n=4 side of face treated
Fraxel Restore on one side of the face for acne scar correction
|
Fractora on Other Side of the Face
n=4 side of face treated
Fractora on other side of the face for acne scar correction
|
|---|---|---|
|
Improvement in Acne Scarring - From Baseline to Three Months After Last Treatment
|
2 score on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
2 score on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: treatment visit 1, treatment visit 2, treatment visit 3, three months after last treatmentPopulation: There were 4 participants enrolled and treated, the participants received bilateral facial treatments with Fraxel on one side of the face, and Fractora on the other side of the face
measure side effects by patient reported adverse events and blinded physician assessment of adverse effects. Parameters, include erythema, edema, blistering, crusting, scarring, hypopigmentation, and hyperpigmentation, will be graded on a 4-point scale (0 = absent, 1= mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Higher score means worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fraxel Restore on One Side of the Face
n=4 side of face treated
Fraxel Restore on one side of the face for acne scar correction
|
Fractora on Other Side of the Face
n=4 side of face treated
Fractora on other side of the face for acne scar correction
|
|---|---|---|
|
Comparing Side Effects of the Different Lasers
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: treatment visit 1, treatment visit 2, treatment visit 3Population: There were 4 participants enrolled and treated, the participants received bilateral facial treatments with Fraxel on one side of the face, and Fractora on the other side of the face
Patients will also be evaluated the intensity of pain using a visual analogue scale (0 = absence of pain, 10 = most-severe pain). Higher score means worse outcome
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fraxel Restore on One Side of the Face
n=4 side of face treated
Fraxel Restore on one side of the face for acne scar correction
|
Fractora on Other Side of the Face
n=4 side of face treated
Fractora on other side of the face for acne scar correction
|
|---|---|---|
|
Comparing Intensity of Pain With the Different Lasers
|
3 score on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 5.0
|
7 score on a scale
Interval 6.0 to 8.0
|
Adverse Events
Fraxel Restore on One Side of the Face
Fractora on Other Side of the Face
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place