Debulking Surgery in Ovarian Cancer

NCT03378128 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2022-03-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to see if patients undergoing a laparoscopic surgery for removal of ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoadjuvant- chemotherapy given before surgery) is feasible, safe, and provides similar outcomes as compared to undergoing a large abdominal incision. Minimally invasive, or laparoscopic, surgery is a type of surgery where only small incisions are made on the abdomen and surgical instruments are placed through these incisions to perform the surgery. This type of surgery has been shown to improve outcomes in many types of surgery, including in gynecologic cancer surgery. Specifically, researchers know that patients who have minimally invasive surgery have less pain after surgery, can go home quicker from the hospital, healing time is more rapid, and potentially this can translate into returning to chemotherapy sooner. Specifically, in ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer, minimally invasive surgery has not been used as much because these cancers can have tumors all throughout the inside of the abdomen (i.e. wide tumor burden) and located in areas that are sometimes not easily reachable with laparoscopic instruments. However, the reason patients receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy is to shrink the tumor/s to make the surgery less extensive and the recovery easier. It is unknown if minimally invasive surgery can be used in this setting and by studying this, the study team will be able to determine if patient outcomes are improved by implementing (using) this surgical technique.

Conditions

  • Malignant Neoplasm of Ovary
  • Malignant Neoplasm of Fallopian Tube
  • Malignant Neoplasm of Peritoneum

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Diagnostic laparoscopy

The patient will initially undergo a diagnostic laparoscopy by a minimally invasive approach and entry method. The decision of which approach and entry to perform will be dictated by the primary surgeon of record's preference and their assessment of pre-operative patient factors. Once the primary surgeon determines the areas of macroscopic disease, he/she will make an assessment as to the need to convert to a laparotomy or continue laparoscopically. At the completion of the procedure, it will be noted whether an optimal cytoreduction (≤ 1 cm residual disease) or a sub-optimal cytoreduction (\>1 cm residual disease) was performed.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Chad Michener, MD · Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
19 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-01-12
Primary Completion
2020-04-30
Completion
2020-04-30

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03378128 on ClinicalTrials.gov