Evaluation of the Patient Deterioration Warning System

Summary

The overall goal of the project is to reduce the number of unexpected patient deteriorations by 50% at Emergency Departments (ED) by investigating if the novel Patient Deterioration Warning Systems (PDWS), can improve clinicians' ability to identify deterioration at an earlier stage.

A third of all acute medical patients with normal vital signs at arrival, experience a deterioration in vital signs during the 24 first hours. This can potentially lead to dire consequences for these patients, as the risk of deterioration is present across all severity levels. The utilization of patient monitoring systems in the dispersed and shared working environments of EDs and acute wards may help to identify some of the reasons for failure to rescue patients. Thus, quantifying the extent to which a patient is being monitored, may be an aid to bridge the current gap between usage of automated and manual monitoring as clinical work will continue to depend on tacit knowledge and intuition.

Several systems and protocols have been established to swiftly deal with identified deterioration. Most systems struggle with issues of clinical adherence and are difficult to assess on-the-fly, and in some cases nurses failed to notice abnormality in 43% of patients experiencing deterioration. Although the trajectories of patients' vital signs have been identified as more important than the initial scoring value, most of the widely used Track and Trigger systems lack a temporal aspect. Furthermore, a limited number of these Track and Trigger systems have been integrated into real time clinical decision support systems, which has not evolved much in the last decades.

The PDWS deals with these challenges by aggregating and summarizing all vital values measured with the ED's patient monitors in the ongoing admission to intuitively present the state and trajectory. The investigators intend to determine if making the PDWS system available to nurses and physicians throughout the entire ED improves their ability to identify patients at risk of deterioration. To make this assessment, the PDWS will be evaluated in a cluster randomized trial (CRT) at two ED facilities in Denmark. The CRT is structured in three 5-week intervention, and three 5-week control periods, separated by a washout period of at least one week. The primary outcome is in-hospital deterioration - defined as transfer to the intensive care unit, heart/respiratory failure or death. The effect the PDWS will be assessed by comparing the proportions of events in each study arm using Pearsons's chi-squared test on these two samples. Furthermore, the technical and economical effects are evaluated using the Technology Acceptance Model, and the Model for Assessment of Telemedicine.

Conditions

• Patient Transfer to Intensive Care Unit (Procedure)
• Respiratory Arrest (Disorder)
• Cardiac Arrest (Disorder)
• Patient Died in Hospital (Finding)

Interventions

OTHER

PDWS Intervension

Patients admitted to the emergency department in the intervention period will have their vital values presented on the PDWS in addition to existing patient monitoring systems

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Odense University Hospital

  collaborator OTHER

• Hospital of South Western Jutland

  collaborator UNKNOWN

• University of Southern Denmark

  lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation

NON_RANDOMIZED

Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Masking

NONE

Model

PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age

18 Years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start

2018-05-18

Primary Completion

2019-04-08

Completion

2021-12-31

Countries

• Denmark

Study Locations