Trial Outcomes & Findings for Testing the Impact of Two Posters on Contraceptive Knowledge, Contraceptive Preferences, and Perceived Pregnancy Risk (NCT NCT03372369)
NCT ID: NCT03372369
Last Updated: 2019-08-20
Results Overview
The CKA is a 25-item tool covering knowledge gaps like long-acting reversible contraceptives, emergency contraception, common myths, and efficacy rates which will be used to determine contraception knowledge. One point is added for each correctly answered question for a total possible score of 25. Higher scores reflect greater contraceptive knowledge.
COMPLETED
NA
990 participants
Baseline and 15-20 minutes after baseline (3 minutes after exposure to a poster)
2019-08-20
Participant Flow
Participants were enrolled between January 26 and February 13, 2018. They were enrolled and participated in the study through a survey distributed on Amazon Mechanical Turk.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CDC Poster
After collecting baseline contraceptive knowledge, method preference, if participant were to switch methods during the next year, and current perceived pregnancy risk, participants will view CDC poster for contraceptive effectiveness.
View CDC Poster: The poster designed by the CDC to explain contraceptive effectiveness.
|
Patient-Centered Poster
After collecting baseline contraceptive knowledge, method preference, if participant were to switch methods during the next year, and current perceived pregnancy risk, participants will view Patient-Centered poster for contraceptive effectiveness.
View Patient-Centered Poster: The poster designed by the research team to explain contraceptive effectiveness. This poster was developed through cognitive interviews with 26 North Carolina women, and the final version of this poster was found to be more useful, acceptable, and attractive than the CDC poster by the majority of women participating.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Qualification Period
STARTED
|
495
|
495
|
|
Qualification Period
COMPLETED
|
469
|
473
|
|
Qualification Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
26
|
22
|
|
Intervention and Follow-Up Period
STARTED
|
469
|
473
|
|
Intervention and Follow-Up Period
COMPLETED
|
466
|
470
|
|
Intervention and Follow-Up Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
CDC Poster
After collecting baseline contraceptive knowledge, method preference, if participant were to switch methods during the next year, and current perceived pregnancy risk, participants will view CDC poster for contraceptive effectiveness.
View CDC Poster: The poster designed by the CDC to explain contraceptive effectiveness.
|
Patient-Centered Poster
After collecting baseline contraceptive knowledge, method preference, if participant were to switch methods during the next year, and current perceived pregnancy risk, participants will view Patient-Centered poster for contraceptive effectiveness.
View Patient-Centered Poster: The poster designed by the research team to explain contraceptive effectiveness. This poster was developed through cognitive interviews with 26 North Carolina women, and the final version of this poster was found to be more useful, acceptable, and attractive than the CDC poster by the majority of women participating.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Qualification Period
Withdrawal by Subject
|
16
|
13
|
|
Qualification Period
Inconsistent Eligibility Results
|
10
|
9
|
|
Intervention and Follow-Up Period
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Testing the Impact of Two Posters on Contraceptive Knowledge, Contraceptive Preferences, and Perceived Pregnancy Risk
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CDC Poster
n=469 Participants
After collecting baseline contraceptive knowledge, method preference, if participant were to switch methods during the next year, and current perceived pregnancy risk, participants will view CDC poster for contraceptive effectiveness.
View CDC Poster: The poster designed by the CDC to explain contraceptive effectiveness.
|
Patient-Centered Poster
n=473 Participants
After collecting baseline contraceptive knowledge, method preference, if participant were to switch methods during the next year, and current perceived pregnancy risk, participants will view Patient-Centered poster for contraceptive effectiveness.
View Patient-Centered Poster: The poster designed by the research team to explain contraceptive effectiveness. This poster was developed through cognitive interviews with 26 North Carolina women, and the final version of this poster was found to be more useful, acceptable, and attractive than the CDC poster by the majority of women participating.
|
Total
n=942 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
32 years
n=39 Participants
|
32 years
n=41 Participants
|
32 years
n=35 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
469 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
473 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
942 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or Ethnicity · White
|
353 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
351 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
704 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or Ethnicity · Black or African American
|
45 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
81 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or Ethnicity · Hispanic or Latina
|
17 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or Ethnicity · Some Other Race
|
28 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or Ethnicity · Multiracial
|
26 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
469 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
473 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
942 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 15-20 minutes after baseline (3 minutes after exposure to a poster)The CKA is a 25-item tool covering knowledge gaps like long-acting reversible contraceptives, emergency contraception, common myths, and efficacy rates which will be used to determine contraception knowledge. One point is added for each correctly answered question for a total possible score of 25. Higher scores reflect greater contraceptive knowledge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CDC Poster
n=466 Participants
After collecting baseline contraceptive knowledge, method preference, if participant were to switch methods during the next year, and current perceived pregnancy risk, participants will view CDC poster for contraceptive effectiveness.
View CDC Poster: The poster designed by the CDC to explain contraceptive effectiveness.
|
Patient-Centered Poster
n=470 Participants
After collecting baseline contraceptive knowledge, method preference, if participant were to switch methods during the next year, and current perceived pregnancy risk, participants will view Patient-Centered poster for contraceptive effectiveness.
View Patient-Centered Poster: The poster designed by the research team to explain contraceptive effectiveness. This poster was developed through cognitive interviews with 26 North Carolina women, and the final version of this poster was found to be more useful, acceptable, and attractive than the CDC poster by the majority of women participating.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Contraceptive Knowledge Assessment (CKA) Score
|
0.90 scores on a scale
Interval 0.66 to 1.13
|
1.6 scores on a scale
Interval 1.31 to 1.9
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 15-20 minutes after baseline (1 minute after exposure to a poster)Women will be asked whether they are planning on switching contraceptive methods in the next year and which methods of contraception they would hypothetically consider using if they were to switch contraceptive methods within the next year. They are then asked to rank the methods in order of how likely they would be to use each method. A woman's "contraceptive preference" is the method that she says she would be most likely to use. Methods will be scored from 0-3: '0' for no method, '1' for ineffective methods like condoms, '2' for effective methods like the Pill, and '3' for highly effective methods like Intrauterine Devices (IUDs). Positive scores reflect improvements in the effectiveness of the contraceptive method that women say they are likely to use.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CDC Poster
n=466 Participants
After collecting baseline contraceptive knowledge, method preference, if participant were to switch methods during the next year, and current perceived pregnancy risk, participants will view CDC poster for contraceptive effectiveness.
View CDC Poster: The poster designed by the CDC to explain contraceptive effectiveness.
|
Patient-Centered Poster
n=470 Participants
After collecting baseline contraceptive knowledge, method preference, if participant were to switch methods during the next year, and current perceived pregnancy risk, participants will view Patient-Centered poster for contraceptive effectiveness.
View Patient-Centered Poster: The poster designed by the research team to explain contraceptive effectiveness. This poster was developed through cognitive interviews with 26 North Carolina women, and the final version of this poster was found to be more useful, acceptable, and attractive than the CDC poster by the majority of women participating.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Effective Contraception Preference Score
|
0.09 scores on a scale
Interval 0.02 to 0.17
|
0.09 scores on a scale
Interval 0.01 to 0.17
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 15-20 minutes after baseline (2 minutes after exposure to a poster)Women are asked what their chances of getting pregnant this year are (very high=4, high=3, moderate=2, low=1, very low=0). A good outcome in terms of reducing the risk of unprotected sex and unplanned pregnancy would be increased perceived pregnancy risk as reflected in a higher score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CDC Poster
n=466 Participants
After collecting baseline contraceptive knowledge, method preference, if participant were to switch methods during the next year, and current perceived pregnancy risk, participants will view CDC poster for contraceptive effectiveness.
View CDC Poster: The poster designed by the CDC to explain contraceptive effectiveness.
|
Patient-Centered Poster
n=470 Participants
After collecting baseline contraceptive knowledge, method preference, if participant were to switch methods during the next year, and current perceived pregnancy risk, participants will view Patient-Centered poster for contraceptive effectiveness.
View Patient-Centered Poster: The poster designed by the research team to explain contraceptive effectiveness. This poster was developed through cognitive interviews with 26 North Carolina women, and the final version of this poster was found to be more useful, acceptable, and attractive than the CDC poster by the majority of women participating.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Perceived Pregnancy Risk Score
|
0.002 scores on a scale
Interval -0.06 to 0.06
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Interval -0.03 to 0.09
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 15-20 minutes after baseline (2 minutes after exposure to a poster)Women are asked what their chances of getting pregnant this year are (very high, high, moderate, low, very low). This response is compared to the most effective contraceptive method women reported using in the past three months using the same categories of effectiveness as in the "change in effective contraception preference score" outcome. Women received a score of 1 if their perceived pregnancy risk was accurate based on their current contraceptive method and a score of 0 if it was inaccurate. Women's perceived pregnancy risk was accurate if: they used a highly effective method and they said they were at very low risk; if they used an effective method and they said they were at low or moderate risk; if they used a less effective method and said they were at moderate or high risk; or if they used no method and said they were at very high risk. A good outcome would be increased accuracy of perceived pregnancy risk as reflected by a higher score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CDC Poster
n=466 Participants
After collecting baseline contraceptive knowledge, method preference, if participant were to switch methods during the next year, and current perceived pregnancy risk, participants will view CDC poster for contraceptive effectiveness.
View CDC Poster: The poster designed by the CDC to explain contraceptive effectiveness.
|
Patient-Centered Poster
n=470 Participants
After collecting baseline contraceptive knowledge, method preference, if participant were to switch methods during the next year, and current perceived pregnancy risk, participants will view Patient-Centered poster for contraceptive effectiveness.
View Patient-Centered Poster: The poster designed by the research team to explain contraceptive effectiveness. This poster was developed through cognitive interviews with 26 North Carolina women, and the final version of this poster was found to be more useful, acceptable, and attractive than the CDC poster by the majority of women participating.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mean Accuracy of Perceived Pregnancy Risk Score
|
0 scores on a scale
Interval -0.02 to 0.02
|
0.013 scores on a scale
Interval -0.01 to 0.04
|
Adverse Events
CDC Poster
Patient-Centered Poster
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Seri Link Anderson, PhD
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place