Trial Outcomes & Findings for Psychological Intervention for Caregivers of Patients Undergoing Stem Cell Transplant (NCT NCT03328663)

NCT ID: NCT03328663

Last Updated: 2026-03-20

Results Overview

Feasibility defined if eligible caregivers randomized to intervention attend at least 50% of the intervention visits

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

100 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

15 months

Results posted on

2026-03-20

Participant Flow

8 caregivers who were enrolled were never randomized as they became ineligible prior to randomization with the transplant aborted.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
CARE Intervention
* Six psychological intervention sessions in-person or via video conferencing conducted by a trained psychologist * The CARE intervention contain 3 component * a psychoeducational component to address preparednessmanage expectations, and develop caregiving skills * a psychosocial component focusing on coping strategies, mindfulness, and facilitating acceptance while living with uncertainty * a self-care component to promote caregiver health and well-being CARE: Promote effective coping and reduce caregiving burden.
Standard Transplant Care
* Standard Transplant Care * Social work consults to help caregivers only upon request CARE: Promote effective coping and reduce caregiving burden. Standard Transplant Care: Standard cared administered by the hospital.
Overall Study
STARTED
45
47
Overall Study
COMPLETED
42
45
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Psychological Intervention for Caregivers of Patients Undergoing Stem Cell Transplant

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Standard Transplant Care
n=47 Participants
* Standard Transplant Care * Social work consults to help caregivers only upon request CARE: Promote effective coping and reduce caregiving burden. Standard Transplant Care: Standard cared administered by the hospital.
Total
n=92 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
CARE Intervention
n=45 Participants
* Six psychological intervention sessions in-person or via video conferencing conducted by a trained psychologist * The CARE intervention contain 3 component * a psychoeducational component to address preparednessmanage expectations, and develop caregiving skills * a psychosocial component focusing on coping strategies, mindfulness, and facilitating acceptance while living with uncertainty * a self-care component to promote caregiver health and well-being CARE: Promote effective coping and reduce caregiving burden.
Age, Continuous
62 years
n=151 Participants
61 years
n=305 Participants
58 years
n=154 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants
n=151 Participants
64 Participants
n=305 Participants
31 Participants
n=154 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants
n=151 Participants
28 Participants
n=305 Participants
14 Participants
n=154 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants
n=151 Participants
2 Participants
n=305 Participants
0 Participants
n=154 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=151 Participants
0 Participants
n=305 Participants
0 Participants
n=154 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=151 Participants
0 Participants
n=305 Participants
0 Participants
n=154 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
n=151 Participants
3 Participants
n=305 Participants
2 Participants
n=154 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
43 Participants
n=151 Participants
85 Participants
n=305 Participants
42 Participants
n=154 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=151 Participants
2 Participants
n=305 Participants
1 Participants
n=154 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=151 Participants
0 Participants
n=305 Participants
0 Participants
n=154 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 15 months

Population: Participants randomized to the CARE intervention

Feasibility defined if eligible caregivers randomized to intervention attend at least 50% of the intervention visits

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CARE Interventions
n=45 Participants
Feasibility measure only applies to Care intervention participants receiving the psychological intervention
Standard Transplant Care
* Standard Transplant Care * Social work consults to help caregivers only upon request CARE: Promote effective coping and reduce caregiving burden. Standard Transplant Care: Standard cared administered by the hospital.
Feasibility of the Intervention (Feasibility Description Below)
36 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: day 60

we will compare caregiver QOL as measured by CarGOQOL between study groups. The CARGOQOL ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better QOL

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CARE Interventions
n=42 Participants
Feasibility measure only applies to Care intervention participants receiving the psychological intervention
Standard Transplant Care
n=45 Participants
* Standard Transplant Care * Social work consults to help caregivers only upon request CARE: Promote effective coping and reduce caregiving burden. Standard Transplant Care: Standard cared administered by the hospital.
Compare Caregiver Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the Caregiver Oncology QOL (CarGOQOL) Questionnaire Between the Study Arms
81.22 score on a scale
Interval 77.69 to 84.74
70.96 score on a scale
Interval 67.56 to 74.36

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: day 60

we will compare caregiver caregiving burden as measured by Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA). The CRA ranges from 24-120 with higher scores indicating greater caregiving burden

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CARE Interventions
n=42 Participants
Feasibility measure only applies to Care intervention participants receiving the psychological intervention
Standard Transplant Care
n=45 Participants
* Standard Transplant Care * Social work consults to help caregivers only upon request CARE: Promote effective coping and reduce caregiving burden. Standard Transplant Care: Standard cared administered by the hospital.
Compare Caregiving Burden (CRA) Between the Study Arms
46.95 score on a scale
Interval 43.62 to 50.29
55.06 score on a scale
Interval 51.81 to 58.31

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: day 60

We will compare caregiver anxiety use the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) between the two groups. The HADS includes two subscales: depression (range 0 (no distress) to 21 (maximum distress) and anxiety (range 0 (no distress) and 21 (maximum distress)). Higher scores on HADS-Anxiety subscale indicate worse anxiety symptoms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CARE Interventions
n=42 Participants
Feasibility measure only applies to Care intervention participants receiving the psychological intervention
Standard Transplant Care
n=45 Participants
* Standard Transplant Care * Social work consults to help caregivers only upon request CARE: Promote effective coping and reduce caregiving burden. Standard Transplant Care: Standard cared administered by the hospital.
Compare Caregiver Anxiety Using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Between the Study Arms
3.62 score on a scale
Interval 2.47 to 4.77
7.22 score on a scale
Interval 6.11 to 8.33

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: day 60

We will compare caregiver self-efficacy using the Cancer Self-Efficacy Scale-transplant (CASE-t) between study groups. The scale ranges from 0 to 170 with higher scores indicate higher self efficacy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CARE Interventions
n=42 Participants
Feasibility measure only applies to Care intervention participants receiving the psychological intervention
Standard Transplant Care
n=45 Participants
* Standard Transplant Care * Social work consults to help caregivers only upon request CARE: Promote effective coping and reduce caregiving burden. Standard Transplant Care: Standard cared administered by the hospital.
Compare Caregiver Self-efficacy Using the Cancer Self-Efficacy Scale-Transplant (CASE-t) Between the Study Arms
156.20 score on a scale
Interval 150.69 to 161.71
147.06 score on a scale
Interval 141.56 to 152.57

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: day 60

Compare caregiver coping skills using the Measure of Current Status (MOCS) between the study arms. Score ranges from 0-52, with higher scores indicating higher coping skills

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CARE Interventions
n=42 Participants
Feasibility measure only applies to Care intervention participants receiving the psychological intervention
Standard Transplant Care
n=45 Participants
* Standard Transplant Care * Social work consults to help caregivers only upon request CARE: Promote effective coping and reduce caregiving burden. Standard Transplant Care: Standard cared administered by the hospital.
Compare Perceived Coping Skills (MOCS) Between the Study Arms
36.54 score on a scale
Interval 33.88 to 39.19
28.02 score on a scale
Interval 25.41 to 30.64

Adverse Events

CARE Intervention

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Standard Transplant Care

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Areej El-Jawahri

Massachusetts General Hospital

Phone: 617-724-4000

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place