LIFT Technique Versus Seton in Management of Anal Fistula
NCT03311035 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2017-10-19
Summary
Abscesses and anal fistulas represent about 70% of perianal suppuration, with an estimated incidence of 1/10,000 inhabitants per year and representing 5% of queries in coloproctology.
Anal fistula is the chronic phase of anorectal infection is characterized by chronic purulent drainage or cyclic pain associated with acute relapse of the abscess followed by intermittent spontaneous decompression.
Perianal fistulas have a troublesome pathology. The most widely accepted theory is that anal abscess is caused by infection of an anal crypt gland. Suppuration moves from the anal gland to the inter-sphincteric space, forming an abscess leading to the development of a fistula. The incidence of fistula following an abscess is nearly 33%.
A fistula can cause pain, perianal swelling, discharge, bleeding, and other nonspecific symptoms.
The diagnosis of fistula-in-ano may include a digital rectal examination, endoanal ultrasound, fistulography, and MRI.
The management of the disease is difficult and sometimes a challenge for the surgeon.
The ideal treatment is based on three central principles: control of sepsis, closure of the fistula and maintenance of continence.
The management of complex fistulas needs to balance the outcomes of cure and continence. Success is usually determined by identification of the primary opening and dividing the least amount of muscle as possible.
There is a risk of sphincter muscle damage during fistulotomy, which can lead to an unacceptable risk of anal incontinence of varying degrees.
The surgical techniques described for the treatment of fistula-in-ano are fistulotomy, core-out fistulectomy, seton placement, endorectal advancement flap, injection of fibrin glue, insertion of a fistula plug, video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) and ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), Surgical techniques are composed of 2 broad categories, including sphincter sacrificing procedures, such as, fistulotomy, fistulectomy and cutting seton. and sphincter-preserving procedures, such as fibrin glue injection, fistula plug, rectal advancement flap, VAAFT and LIFT. In general, sphincter sacrificing procedures have high success rates but are associated with high rates of fecal incontinence. In contrast, sphincter-preserving procedures have more modest success rates but are associated with a relatively minimal risk of changes in continence.
While low transsphincteric fistulae are well-addressed by fistulotomy (i.e., lay-open technique) with minimal change in long-term bowel habits, fistulae which involve more than 30 % of the internal sphincter carry a substantial risk of fecal incontinence with this approach.
Endorectal advancement flap is technically difficult and associated with high recurrence rate up to 50% and risk of incontinence up to 35%.
Fibrin glue and anal fistula plug have a little effect on incontinence but are associated with high recurrence up to 60 % and are costive.
VAAFT is effective method but is highly costive.
Setons can be employed as cutting and non-cutting kinds as dividers or markers . A few types of setons used are the Ayurveda-medicated thread , braided sutures thread, rubber band , Penrose drains and cable tie seton . Seton material should be non-absorbable, from non-slippage material, comfortable and least irritant for the patient and equally ejective in causing focal reaction in the track, leading to fibrosis .
However, setons may cause patient discomfort, both from irritation and from persistent drainage. In addition the incontinence rate may reach 67%.
The ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) was first described by Rojanasakul and colleagues in 2007. Since then, this technique has become popular among providers due to its simple technical elements, particularly when compared to anorectal advancement flaps, and favorable success rate. Among the many studies published in the literature, the success rate after LIFT ranges from 40 to 95 %, with a recurrence rate of 6-28 % .3,5-28 In comparison, success after advancement flap ranges from 60 to 94 %.
Conditions
- Anal Fistula
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Seton
The identification of the primary tract of the fistula and the placement of the thread can be performed in one single step. a non-absorbable, braided thread is inserted . After excision of the external opening and the extrasphincteric parts of the fistula, the thread is grasped and is pulled out of the anus .The thread is cut in two parts. The mucosa is incised over the muscular bridge . One thread is tied snugly around the muscle; the other is tied loosely .The snugly tied seton has to be replaced after 14 days to provide appropriate tension to cut slowly trough the muscle. This can easily be achieved with the second loosely tied seton . A new thread is folded in the middle and connected to the opened sling of the loose seton using a special knot shown in.The old thread is removed and in the same maneuver two new setons are placed. Again, one thread is tied snugly around the remaining portion of the sphincter muscle; the other is tied loosely .
- PROCEDURE
-
LIFT technique
The internal opening was identified . The intersphincteric plane was entered via a curvilinear incision corresponding to the site of the internal opening at the intersphincteric groove. The intersphincteric plane was developed by meticulous scissor and diathermy dissection up to the tract. Once identified, a small, right-angled clamp was hooked underneath or a tape passed round it. the tract was then transfixed close to the internal sphincter with 2/0 polyglactin suture . Saline was gently injected through the external opening to confirm that the tract was no longer patent and it was then divided distal to the point of ligation . After light traction, a segment of the distal tract was excised and, if needed, any defect in the external sphincter was closed. The intersphincteric incision wound was re-approximated loosely with interrupted 2/0 Vicryl. Partial core-out of the fistula tract was performed from the external opening to the external sphincter.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Assiut University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 16 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-10-18
- Primary Completion
- 2019-12-01
- Completion
- 2019-12-30
More Related Trials
-
Rerouting Seton Versus LIFT for Complex Anal Fistula
NCT04616911 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ligation of Inter-sphincteric Fistula Tract for Management of Anal Fistula
NCT05314205 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Long Term Outcomes After Surgery for Anal Fistula
NCT04588701 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of the Recovery Rate and Postoperative Incontinence of Surgical Fistulas in a Cohort of a Reference Centre
NCT03865823 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Success Rate, Continence, and Quality of Life With a Bioprosthetic Plug for Treating Complex Anal Fistula
NCT01612195 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Effect of Short Term Versus Long Term Treatment With Seton Prior to LIFT Surgery for Complex Anal Fistula
NCT01913249 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Transsphincteric Fistula Management Using LIFT and MAF
NCT06616662 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ethibond Suture vs Vessel Loop as Draining Seton for Complex Anal Fistulas
NCT05933343 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Perirectal Fistula With Cutting Seton vs. Collagen Plug
NCT00450671 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Ligation of Intersphincteric Track (LIFT) Versus Fistulectomy in Trans-sphincteric Anal Ffistula.
NCT04351074 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Diagnostic Value of Recto-perineal Ultrasound in Perianal Fistula
NCT06314945 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Outcome of Combined Partial Fistulectomy or Fistulotomy and Cutting Seton Procedure in High Perianal Fistula
NCT04796376 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Treatment of High Perianal Fistulas
NCT01997645 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract Versus Rectal Advancement Flap in the Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula
NCT05263661 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Re-routing in Treatment High Anal Fistula
NCT05476146 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Anal Fistula Plug Versus Endorectal Advancement Flap
NCT01931371 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RCT on LIFT Versus Modified Parks Technique Versus Two-Stage Seton
NCT04377542 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection on Wound Healing After Fistulotomy for Simple Anal Fistula Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
NCT07248007 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Anal Fistulae Internal Opening Closure by OTSC Clip After Video Assisted Tract Fulguration
NCT06243302 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Endorectal Three-dimensional Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cryptogenic Fistulas of the Rectum.
NCT03743701 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Two Approaches to Lower the Chances of Recurrence of Anal Fistula After Surgery
NCT06380036 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) + Biodesign for Anal Fistula
NCT01602081 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Anal Fistula Plug, a Retrospective Study
NCT04319861 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D Endoanal Ultrasound and Anal Fistula
NCT03937752 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparing Three Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Transsphincteric Perianal Fistula: (1) Traditional Fistulotomy (Lay Open), (2) Ligation of the Intersphincteric Tract (LIFT) With Adjunctive Endo Fistula Laser Ablation, and (3) Open LIFT Procedure Followed by LASER
NCT07236047 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA