Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effectiveness of Embrace Scar Therapy Device After Cutaneous Wound Closure (NCT NCT03294863)
NCT ID: NCT03294863
Last Updated: 2026-06-10
Results Overview
The Patient Observer Scar Assessment Score (POSAS) will be used to compare the cosmetic appearance of scars in the area treated with the device versus the area that was not treated. The POSAS measures scar quality in all types of scars by evaluating visual (e.g. color), tactile (e.g. pliability) and sensory (e.g. itch) characteristics of the scar from the perspective of the observer and patients. Scores for each subscale range from 1 to 10, for a sum score range from 6 to 60. Low scores indicate better outcomes.
TERMINATED
NA
49 participants
3 months
2026-06-10
Participant Flow
Participants recruited for the study had their scars divided into two sections, labeled A and B. These sections were randomized, with one section receiving standard care while the other received the study intervention. A total of 49 participants were included in the study, resulting in 98 wound halves assessed at baseline.
Unit of analysis: Wound Halves
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Embrace Scar Therapy Device
16x5-cm silicone elastomeric dressing that adheres to the skin using a pressure-sensitive silicone adhesive will be applied to 1/2 of the cutaneous wound
Embrace Scar Therapy Device: 16x5-cm silicone elastomeric dressing that adheres to the skin using a pressure-sensitive silicone adhesive.
|
Standard of Care
Another 1/2 of cutaneous wound will be treated per standard of care
Standard of Care: Without the embrace Scar Therapy Device
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
49 49
|
49 49
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20 20
|
20 20
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
29 29
|
29 29
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Embrace Scar Therapy Device
16x5-cm silicone elastomeric dressing that adheres to the skin using a pressure-sensitive silicone adhesive will be applied to 1/2 of the cutaneous wound
Embrace Scar Therapy Device: 16x5-cm silicone elastomeric dressing that adheres to the skin using a pressure-sensitive silicone adhesive.
|
Standard of Care
Another 1/2 of cutaneous wound will be treated per standard of care
Standard of Care: Without the embrace Scar Therapy Device
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
14
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
15
|
15
|
Baseline Characteristics
Effectiveness of Embrace Scar Therapy Device After Cutaneous Wound Closure
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Embrace Scar Therapy Device
n=49 Wound Halves
16x5-cm silicone elastomeric dressing that adheres to the skin using a pressure-sensitive silicone adhesive will be applied to 1/2 of the cutaneous wound
Embrace Scar Therapy Device: 16x5-cm silicone elastomeric dressing that adheres to the skin using a pressure-sensitive silicone adhesive.
|
Standard of Care
n=49 Wound Halves
Another 1/2 of cutaneous wound will be treated per standard of care
Standard of Care: Without the embrace Scar Therapy Device
|
Total
n=98 Wound Halves
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
24 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
24 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
48 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
25 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
25 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
50 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61.55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.16 • n=49 Wound Halves
|
61.55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.16 • n=49 Wound Halves
|
61.55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.16 • n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
26 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
26 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
52 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
23 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
23 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
46 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
47 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
47 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
94 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
2 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
4 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
49 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
49 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
98 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Location of Surgical Procedure
Cheek
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Location of Surgical Procedure
Chin
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Location of Surgical Procedure
Eyelids
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Location of Surgical Procedure
Forehead
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Location of Surgical Procedure
Lip
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Location of Surgical Procedure
Neck
|
1 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
1 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
2 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Location of Surgical Procedure
Preauricular
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Location of Surgical Procedure
Post-auricular
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Location of Surgical Procedure
Temple
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Location of Surgical Procedure
Scalp
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
0 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Location of Surgical Procedure
Chest
|
9 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
9 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
18 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Location of Surgical Procedure
Shoulder
|
3 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
3 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
6 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Location of Surgical Procedure
Back
|
14 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
14 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
28 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Location of Surgical Procedure
Abdomen
|
3 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
3 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
6 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Location of Surgical Procedure
Arm
|
14 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
14 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
28 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Location of Surgical Procedure
Leg
|
5 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
5 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
10 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Surgeon Experience
Fellow
|
3 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
3 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
6 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Surgeon Experience
Attending
|
28 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
28 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
56 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Surgeon Experience
Resident
|
18 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
18 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
36 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Indication for Surgery
Mohs Surgery
|
8 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
8 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
16 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
|
Indication for Surgery
Excision Surgery
|
41 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
41 Wound Halves
n=49 Wound Halves
|
82 Wound Halves
n=98 Wound Halves
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsPopulation: The study was terminated early due to inadequate participant follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in the analysis of only 20 participants. Each patient's wound was divided into two sides, labeled A and B. An intervention was randomly assigned to each side, leading to a total of 40 wound halves analyzed. However, due to the limited sample size, no conclusive results can be drawn.
The Patient Observer Scar Assessment Score (POSAS) will be used to compare the cosmetic appearance of scars in the area treated with the device versus the area that was not treated. The POSAS measures scar quality in all types of scars by evaluating visual (e.g. color), tactile (e.g. pliability) and sensory (e.g. itch) characteristics of the scar from the perspective of the observer and patients. Scores for each subscale range from 1 to 10, for a sum score range from 6 to 60. Low scores indicate better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Embrace Scar Therapy Device
n=20 wound halves
16x5-cm silicone elastomeric dressing that adheres to the skin using a pressure-sensitive silicone adhesive will be applied to 1/2 of the cutaneous wound
Embrace Scar Therapy Device: 16x5-cm silicone elastomeric dressing that adheres to the skin using a pressure-sensitive silicone adhesive.
|
Standard of Care
n=20 wound halves
Another 1/2 of cutaneous wound will be treated per standard of care
Standard of Care: Without the embrace Scar Therapy Device
|
|---|---|---|
|
Physician Observer Scar Assessment Score (POSAS)
|
20.45 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.46
|
19.28 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.84
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsPopulation: The study was terminated early due to inadequate participant follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in the analysis of only 20 participants. Each patient's wound was divided into two sides, labeled A and B. An intervention was randomly assigned to each side, leading to a total of 40 wound halves analyzed. However, due to the limited sample size, no conclusive results can be drawn.
The width of the scar on both sides will also be measured and recorded 1 cm from midline on both sides of the scar
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Embrace Scar Therapy Device
n=20 wound halves
16x5-cm silicone elastomeric dressing that adheres to the skin using a pressure-sensitive silicone adhesive will be applied to 1/2 of the cutaneous wound
Embrace Scar Therapy Device: 16x5-cm silicone elastomeric dressing that adheres to the skin using a pressure-sensitive silicone adhesive.
|
Standard of Care
n=20 wound halves
Another 1/2 of cutaneous wound will be treated per standard of care
Standard of Care: Without the embrace Scar Therapy Device
|
|---|---|---|
|
Width of the Scar
|
1.62 mm
Standard Deviation 2.40
|
1.40 mm
Standard Deviation 2.31
|
Adverse Events
Embrace Scar Therapy Device
Standard of Care
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Embrace Scar Therapy Device
n=49 participants at risk
16x5-cm silicone elastomeric dressing that adheres to the skin using a pressure-sensitive silicone adhesive will be applied to 1/2 of the cutaneous wound
Embrace Scar Therapy Device: 16x5-cm silicone elastomeric dressing that adheres to the skin using a pressure-sensitive silicone adhesive.
|
Standard of Care
n=49 participants at risk
Another 1/2 of cutaneous wound will be treated per standard of care
Standard of Care: Without the embrace Scar Therapy Device
|
|---|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Adhesive Reaction
|
18.4%
9/49 • Baseline Visit (Day 0) to Follow Up Visit (3 Months)
The data collection process for the study included a complication form designed to document all adverse events experienced by participants. The form required detailed information regarding the timing of the complications, the affected side, and any relevant contextual notes. Participants were invited to contact the research team at any time to report AEs. Furthermore, during the three-month follow-up, patients were asked about complication, and the reviewer noted any complications they observed.
|
10.2%
5/49 • Baseline Visit (Day 0) to Follow Up Visit (3 Months)
The data collection process for the study included a complication form designed to document all adverse events experienced by participants. The form required detailed information regarding the timing of the complications, the affected side, and any relevant contextual notes. Participants were invited to contact the research team at any time to report AEs. Furthermore, during the three-month follow-up, patients were asked about complication, and the reviewer noted any complications they observed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Suture Abscess
|
2.0%
1/49 • Baseline Visit (Day 0) to Follow Up Visit (3 Months)
The data collection process for the study included a complication form designed to document all adverse events experienced by participants. The form required detailed information regarding the timing of the complications, the affected side, and any relevant contextual notes. Participants were invited to contact the research team at any time to report AEs. Furthermore, during the three-month follow-up, patients were asked about complication, and the reviewer noted any complications they observed.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Baseline Visit (Day 0) to Follow Up Visit (3 Months)
The data collection process for the study included a complication form designed to document all adverse events experienced by participants. The form required detailed information regarding the timing of the complications, the affected side, and any relevant contextual notes. Participants were invited to contact the research team at any time to report AEs. Furthermore, during the three-month follow-up, patients were asked about complication, and the reviewer noted any complications they observed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Infection
|
6.1%
3/49 • Baseline Visit (Day 0) to Follow Up Visit (3 Months)
The data collection process for the study included a complication form designed to document all adverse events experienced by participants. The form required detailed information regarding the timing of the complications, the affected side, and any relevant contextual notes. Participants were invited to contact the research team at any time to report AEs. Furthermore, during the three-month follow-up, patients were asked about complication, and the reviewer noted any complications they observed.
|
4.1%
2/49 • Baseline Visit (Day 0) to Follow Up Visit (3 Months)
The data collection process for the study included a complication form designed to document all adverse events experienced by participants. The form required detailed information regarding the timing of the complications, the affected side, and any relevant contextual notes. Participants were invited to contact the research team at any time to report AEs. Furthermore, during the three-month follow-up, patients were asked about complication, and the reviewer noted any complications they observed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Localized Pain at Site
|
2.0%
1/49 • Baseline Visit (Day 0) to Follow Up Visit (3 Months)
The data collection process for the study included a complication form designed to document all adverse events experienced by participants. The form required detailed information regarding the timing of the complications, the affected side, and any relevant contextual notes. Participants were invited to contact the research team at any time to report AEs. Furthermore, during the three-month follow-up, patients were asked about complication, and the reviewer noted any complications they observed.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Baseline Visit (Day 0) to Follow Up Visit (3 Months)
The data collection process for the study included a complication form designed to document all adverse events experienced by participants. The form required detailed information regarding the timing of the complications, the affected side, and any relevant contextual notes. Participants were invited to contact the research team at any time to report AEs. Furthermore, during the three-month follow-up, patients were asked about complication, and the reviewer noted any complications they observed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dehiscence
|
2.0%
1/49 • Baseline Visit (Day 0) to Follow Up Visit (3 Months)
The data collection process for the study included a complication form designed to document all adverse events experienced by participants. The form required detailed information regarding the timing of the complications, the affected side, and any relevant contextual notes. Participants were invited to contact the research team at any time to report AEs. Furthermore, during the three-month follow-up, patients were asked about complication, and the reviewer noted any complications they observed.
|
2.0%
1/49 • Baseline Visit (Day 0) to Follow Up Visit (3 Months)
The data collection process for the study included a complication form designed to document all adverse events experienced by participants. The form required detailed information regarding the timing of the complications, the affected side, and any relevant contextual notes. Participants were invited to contact the research team at any time to report AEs. Furthermore, during the three-month follow-up, patients were asked about complication, and the reviewer noted any complications they observed.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place