MedTrace Logo

Comparison of the Bulb Aspirator to a Nasal Oral Aspirator in the Treatment of Bronchiolitis

NCT03288857 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 236

Last updated 2019-04-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators aim to compare the standard bulb aspirator with that of a nasal oral aspirator. The hypothesis is that use of a nasal oral aspirator is more effective at removing nasal secretions in the treatment of bronchiolitis as measured by a predicted 50% decrease in the rate of unscheduled bronchiolitis return visits. The primary endpoint will be the number of unscheduled bronchiolitis return visits; secondary endpoints will include measurements of oral intake, respiratory relief, parental device preference and adverse events.

Conditions

  • Bronchiolitis
  • Aspirator

Interventions

DEVICE

NeilMed Naspira

NeilMed Naspira is a nasal-oral aspirator

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas

    collaborator OTHER

  • University of Texas at Austin

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
1 Month
Max Age
24 Months
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-11-22
Primary Completion
2019-03-21
Completion
2019-03-21

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03288857 on ClinicalTrials.gov