Expanded Hemodialysis Versus Online Hemodiafiltration

Summary

Conventional hemodialysis (HD) is essential for the treatment of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, by reducing serum concentration of uremic toxins and correcting fluid overload.

Nevertheless, HD removes almost exclusively low-range uremic toxins. Therefore, medium-range molecules, such as beta-2-microglobulin might accumulate in tissues, leading to many clinical complications, such as neuropathies, tendinopathies, anemia, bone mineral disease and reduced growth in children.

Convective methods might reduce incidence of these complications, by removing molecules of medium-range molecular weight. Online hemodiafiltration (olHDF) is the most extensively used method in this regard. Nevertheless, there are some barriers to the wider introduction of this method in clinical practice, since specific machines are needed for this procedure, the costs with dialysis lines are higher and water consumption increases. More recently, the development of new membranes for hemodialysis allowed removal of medium- and high-range uremic toxins, with albumin retention. Thus, they allow removal of a broad range of uremic toxins, without changing dialysis machine or increasing water consumption. Such therapy is known as expanded hemodialysis (HDx).

The aim of this present study is to compare the extraction of middle-size molecules, the hemodynamic behavior, fluid and nutritional status of patients submitted to olHDF or HDx, in a crossover study.

Conditions

• Dialysis Related Complication
• Dialysis Hypotension
• Hemodialysis-Induced Symptom

Interventions

DEVICE

Expanded Hemodialysis

Intervention: Conversion from conventional HD to expanded hemodialysis por 1 month. High cutoff with high retention onset dialyzers allow clearance of middle molecules, without reducing significantly serum concentration of albumin. It allows higher convective clearance in comparison to conventional hemodialysis, but it is unknown if such clearance is similar to online hemodiafiltration. Therefore, the aim of the present intervention is to compare this dialyzer with online hemodiafiltration

DEVICE

Online Hemodiafiltration

Intervention: Conversion from conventional HD to online Hemodiafiltration por 1 month. Online hemodiafiltration has been associated with lower incidence of intradialytic hypotension in comparison to conventional hemodialysis.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• University of Sao Paulo

  lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

• Bruno C Silva, PhD · Renal Division, Unversity of São Paulo

Study Design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Model

CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age

18 Years

Max Age

65 Years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start

2017-11-13

Primary Completion

2018-10-18

Completion

2019-03-11

Countries

• Brazil

Study Locations