Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Grandmother Study: Grandmother Initiatives in Family Transformation (NCT NCT03263923)

NCT ID: NCT03263923

Last Updated: 2022-11-08

Results Overview

Center for Epidemiologic Disease - Depression Scale (CES-D) Radloff, 1977. Composite item derived from 20 item scale. Individual items are scored on a 4 point likert scale (0-3). Individual items are summed and possible scale scores range from 0-60. Higher scores represent greater depressive symptoms. Scores of 16 or greater are interpreted as indicating an increased risk of diagnosis of clinical depression.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

346 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

comparison of baseline with 24 weeks post journaling completion

Results posted on

2022-11-08

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Arm 1: Cognitive Behavioral Skills Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling
Cognitive behavioral skills' training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants receive cognitive behavioral skills training by online video, then participants must complete a 28 day online journal reflecting on the cognitive skills they used to handle various situations.
Arm 2: Reflective Journaling Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling
Reflective journaling training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants watch a reflective journaling video and complete a 28 day journal using a different set of prompts to reflect on their days and describe how they handled various situations.
Overall Study
STARTED
174
172
Overall Study
Completed Enrolled Participants Who Completed the Baseline Questionnaire
173
169
Overall Study
Completed Intervention and T2 Questionnaire
149
151
Overall Study
COMPLETED
149
151
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
25
21

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Arm 1: Cognitive Behavioral Skills Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling
Cognitive behavioral skills' training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants receive cognitive behavioral skills training by online video, then participants must complete a 28 day online journal reflecting on the cognitive skills they used to handle various situations.
Arm 2: Reflective Journaling Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling
Reflective journaling training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants watch a reflective journaling video and complete a 28 day journal using a different set of prompts to reflect on their days and describe how they handled various situations.
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
10
8
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
15
13

Baseline Characteristics

The Grandmother Study: Grandmother Initiatives in Family Transformation

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Arm 1: Cognitive Behavioral Skills Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling
n=173 Participants
Cognitive behavioral skills' training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants receive cognitive behavioral skills training by online video, then participants must complete a 28 day online journal reflecting on the cognitive skills they used to handle various situations.
Arm 2: Reflective Journaling Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling
n=169 Participants
Reflective journaling training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants watch a reflective journaling video and complete a 28 day journal using a different set of prompts to reflect on their days and describe how they handled various situations.
Total
n=342 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
55.792 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.080 • n=99 Participants
56.584 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.052 • n=107 Participants
56.194 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.588 • n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
173 Participants
n=99 Participants
169 Participants
n=107 Participants
342 Participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants
n=99 Participants
17 Participants
n=107 Participants
29 Participants
n=206 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
161 Participants
n=99 Participants
152 Participants
n=107 Participants
313 Participants
n=206 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Self-identified racial identity · American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Self-identified racial identity · Asian
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Self-identified racial identity · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Self-identified racial identity · Black or African American
30 Participants
n=99 Participants
34 Participants
n=107 Participants
64 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Self-identified racial identity · White
124 Participants
n=99 Participants
122 Participants
n=107 Participants
246 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Self-identified racial identity · More than one race
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
13 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Self-identified racial identity · Unknown or Not Reported
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
7 Participants
n=107 Participants
16 Participants
n=206 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
173 participants
n=99 Participants
169 participants
n=107 Participants
342 participants
n=206 Participants
Marital Status
Married or living with a partner
86 Participants
n=99 Participants
84 Participants
n=107 Participants
170 Participants
n=206 Participants
Marital Status
Not married or living with a partner
87 Participants
n=99 Participants
85 Participants
n=107 Participants
172 Participants
n=206 Participants
Job Status
Working full-time
63 Participants
n=99 Participants
54 Participants
n=107 Participants
117 Participants
n=206 Participants
Job Status
Working part-time
20 Participants
n=99 Participants
30 Participants
n=107 Participants
50 Participants
n=206 Participants
Job Status
Not working
90 Participants
n=99 Participants
85 Participants
n=107 Participants
175 Participants
n=206 Participants
Educational Attainment
8 years or less
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
Educational Attainment
Some high school
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
8 Participants
n=206 Participants
Educational Attainment
High school complete/GED
26 Participants
n=99 Participants
31 Participants
n=107 Participants
57 Participants
n=206 Participants
Educational Attainment
Post high school, business or trade school
19 Participants
n=99 Participants
13 Participants
n=107 Participants
32 Participants
n=206 Participants
Educational Attainment
1-3 years of college, no degree completed
45 Participants
n=99 Participants
47 Participants
n=107 Participants
92 Participants
n=206 Participants
Educational Attainment
Completed Associate's or other 2 year degree
31 Participants
n=99 Participants
28 Participants
n=107 Participants
59 Participants
n=206 Participants
Educational Attainment
4 years college (completed degree)
30 Participants
n=99 Participants
24 Participants
n=107 Participants
54 Participants
n=206 Participants
Educational Attainment
Graduate school
19 Participants
n=99 Participants
19 Participants
n=107 Participants
38 Participants
n=206 Participants
Number of co-residential grandchildren
One (1) in-home grandchild
93 Participants
n=99 Participants
75 Participants
n=107 Participants
168 Participants
n=206 Participants
Number of co-residential grandchildren
Two (2) in-home grandchildren
45 Participants
n=99 Participants
57 Participants
n=107 Participants
102 Participants
n=206 Participants
Number of co-residential grandchildren
Three (3) in-home grandchildren
21 Participants
n=99 Participants
26 Participants
n=107 Participants
47 Participants
n=206 Participants
Number of co-residential grandchildren
Four (4) in-home grandchildren
11 Participants
n=99 Participants
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
17 Participants
n=206 Participants
Number of co-residential grandchildren
Five (5) in-home grandchildren
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
3 Participants
n=107 Participants
6 Participants
n=206 Participants
Number of co-residential grandchildren
Six (6) in-home grandchildren
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
Number of co-residential grandchildren
Seven (7) in-home grandchildren
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
Self-appraised caregiving stress
7.847 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.394 • n=99 Participants
7.131 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.575 • n=107 Participants
7.419 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.410 • n=206 Participants
Self-appraised caregiving reward
7.865 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.43 • n=99 Participants
7.847 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.394 • n=107 Participants
7.856 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.410 • n=206 Participants
Duke Subjective Social Support
8.775 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.236 • n=99 Participants
8.773 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.443 • n=107 Participants
8.774 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.338 • n=206 Participants
Duke Instrumental Social Support
5.965 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.443 • n=99 Participants
5.799 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.236 • n=107 Participants
5.883 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.338 • n=206 Participants
Resourcefulness
81.208 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.237 • n=99 Participants
81.630 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.079 • n=107 Participants
81.422 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.631 • n=206 Participants
Depressive Cognitions
7.799 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.592 • n=99 Participants
7.76 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.09 • n=107 Participants
7.781 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.841 • n=206 Participants
Caregiving status
Primary caregivers (grandchild(ren), no parents live with grandmother)
143 Participants
n=99 Participants
140 Participants
n=107 Participants
283 Participants
n=206 Participants
Caregiving status
Multigenerational caregivers (grandchild(ren) and at least 1 parent live with grandmother)
30 Participants
n=99 Participants
29 Participants
n=107 Participants
59 Participants
n=206 Participants
Intra-family strain
5.256 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.460 • n=99 Participants
5.107 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.570 • n=107 Participants
5.182 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.513 • n=206 Participants
Family income
Under $999/month
16 Participants
n=99 Participants
20 Participants
n=107 Participants
36 Participants
n=206 Participants
Family income
$1,000-2,000/month
32 Participants
n=99 Participants
41 Participants
n=107 Participants
73 Participants
n=206 Participants
Family income
$2,001-3,000/month
32 Participants
n=99 Participants
27 Participants
n=107 Participants
59 Participants
n=206 Participants
Family income
$3,001-4,000/month
18 Participants
n=99 Participants
26 Participants
n=107 Participants
44 Participants
n=206 Participants
Family income
$4,001-5,000/month
22 Participants
n=99 Participants
24 Participants
n=107 Participants
46 Participants
n=206 Participants
Family income
Over $5,000/month
37 Participants
n=99 Participants
23 Participants
n=107 Participants
60 Participants
n=206 Participants
Family income
Prefer not to answer
16 Participants
n=99 Participants
8 Participants
n=107 Participants
24 Participants
n=206 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: comparison of baseline with 24 weeks post journaling completion

Center for Epidemiologic Disease - Depression Scale (CES-D) Radloff, 1977. Composite item derived from 20 item scale. Individual items are scored on a 4 point likert scale (0-3). Individual items are summed and possible scale scores range from 0-60. Higher scores represent greater depressive symptoms. Scores of 16 or greater are interpreted as indicating an increased risk of diagnosis of clinical depression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm 1: Cognitive Behavioral Skills Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling (N=149)
n=149 Participants
Cognitive behavioral skills' training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants receive cognitive behavioral skills training by online video, then participants must complete a 28 day online journal reflecting on the cognitive skills they used to handle various situations.
Arm 2: Reflective Journaling Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling (N = 151)
n=151 Participants
Reflective journaling training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants watch a reflective journaling video and complete a 28 day journal using a different set of prompts to reflect on their days and describe how they handled various situations.
Depressive Symptoms
Time 1 (baseline)
18.116 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.650
18.231 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.51
Depressive Symptoms
Time 4 (24 wks post-journaling)
15.135 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.650
15.873 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.425

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: comparison of baseline with 24 weeks post journaling

SF 12 individual item: overall self-appraised health. This is a single response item "In general, would you say your health is..." Participants respond on 5 point scale with response options ranging from Poor (1) to Excellent (5). Higher scores indicate better self-appraised health.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm 1: Cognitive Behavioral Skills Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling (N=149)
n=149 Participants
Cognitive behavioral skills' training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants receive cognitive behavioral skills training by online video, then participants must complete a 28 day online journal reflecting on the cognitive skills they used to handle various situations.
Arm 2: Reflective Journaling Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling (N = 151)
n=151 Participants
Reflective journaling training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants watch a reflective journaling video and complete a 28 day journal using a different set of prompts to reflect on their days and describe how they handled various situations.
Well Being
Time 1 (baseline)
2.97 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .974
3.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .982
Well Being
Time 4 (24 wks post-journaling)
2.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .929
2.95 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .909

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: comparison of baseline with 24 weeks post journaling

General Family Functioning 12 item subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD). Participants respond on a 5 point likert scale. The subscale is the mean of the participant's responses to the 12 items with possible composite scores of 0-5. Higher scores indicate worse family well being.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm 1: Cognitive Behavioral Skills Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling (N=149)
n=149 Participants
Cognitive behavioral skills' training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants receive cognitive behavioral skills training by online video, then participants must complete a 28 day online journal reflecting on the cognitive skills they used to handle various situations.
Arm 2: Reflective Journaling Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling (N = 151)
n=151 Participants
Reflective journaling training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants watch a reflective journaling video and complete a 28 day journal using a different set of prompts to reflect on their days and describe how they handled various situations.
Family Well Being - Composite Score Derived From 12 Items.
Time 1 (baseline)
2.300 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .532
2.300 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .503
Family Well Being - Composite Score Derived From 12 Items.
Time 4 (24 wks post-journaling)
2.172 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .600
2.172 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .564

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline vs 24 week followup

Normed score generated by vendor-provided software using all 12 items of the SF-12v2 Health Survey. Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better mental health. Note: the SF-12 measures 8 health domains (Physical Function, Bodily Pain, Vitality, Role-Emotional, Role-Physical, General Health, Social Function, Mental Health) across 12 individual response questions. All 12 responses are normed for gender, and country of origin and differentially weighted to calculate scores for both physical and mental health.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm 1: Cognitive Behavioral Skills Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling (N=149)
n=149 Participants
Cognitive behavioral skills' training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants receive cognitive behavioral skills training by online video, then participants must complete a 28 day online journal reflecting on the cognitive skills they used to handle various situations.
Arm 2: Reflective Journaling Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling (N = 151)
n=151 Participants
Reflective journaling training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants watch a reflective journaling video and complete a 28 day journal using a different set of prompts to reflect on their days and describe how they handled various situations.
SF-12 Mental Health Composite Score
T1 (baseline)
43.452 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.298
41.613 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.003
SF-12 Mental Health Composite Score
T4 (24 week followup post journal)
45.611 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.001
45.230 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.357

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline vs 24 week followup

Normed score generated by vendor-provided software using all 12 items of the SF-12v2 Health Survey. Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better physical health. Note: the SF-12 measures 8 health domains (Physical Function, Bodily Pain, Vitality, Role-Emotional, Role-Physical, General Health, Social Function, Mental Health) across 12 individual response questions. All 12 responses are normed for gender, and country of origin and differentially weighted to calculate scores for both physical and mental health.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm 1: Cognitive Behavioral Skills Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling (N=149)
n=149 Participants
Cognitive behavioral skills' training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants receive cognitive behavioral skills training by online video, then participants must complete a 28 day online journal reflecting on the cognitive skills they used to handle various situations.
Arm 2: Reflective Journaling Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling (N = 151)
n=151 Participants
Reflective journaling training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants watch a reflective journaling video and complete a 28 day journal using a different set of prompts to reflect on their days and describe how they handled various situations.
SF-12 Physical Health Composite Score
T1 (Baseline)
44.344 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.907
45.125 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.700
SF-12 Physical Health Composite Score
T4 (24 week followup post journal)
44.654 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.303
44.506 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.531

Adverse Events

Arm 1: Cognitive Behavioral Skills Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 52 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Arm 2: Reflective Journaling Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 45 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Arm 1: Cognitive Behavioral Skills Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling
n=173 participants at risk
Cognitive behavioral skills' training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants receive cognitive behavioral skills training by online video, then participants must complete a 28 day online journal reflecting on the cognitive skills they used to handle various situations.
Arm 2: Reflective Journaling Training & 4 Wks Online Journaling
n=169 participants at risk
Reflective journaling training and 4 weeks of online journaling. Participants watch a reflective journaling video and complete a 28 day journal using a different set of prompts to reflect on their days and describe how they handled various situations.
Psychiatric disorders
Elevated depressive symptoms at T1: Baseline
17.9%
31/173 • Number of events 31 • Participants were screened for depressive symptoms (using the CES-D 20 item scale) at baseline (T1) and 2 weeks (T2), 12 weeks (T3), and 24 weeks post-intervention (T4).
18.3%
31/169 • Number of events 31 • Participants were screened for depressive symptoms (using the CES-D 20 item scale) at baseline (T1) and 2 weeks (T2), 12 weeks (T3), and 24 weeks post-intervention (T4).
Psychiatric disorders
Elevated depressive symptoms at T2: 2 weeks post-intervention
5.2%
9/173 • Number of events 9 • Participants were screened for depressive symptoms (using the CES-D 20 item scale) at baseline (T1) and 2 weeks (T2), 12 weeks (T3), and 24 weeks post-intervention (T4).
5.3%
9/169 • Number of events 9 • Participants were screened for depressive symptoms (using the CES-D 20 item scale) at baseline (T1) and 2 weeks (T2), 12 weeks (T3), and 24 weeks post-intervention (T4).
Psychiatric disorders
Elevated depressive symptoms at T3: 12 weeks post-intervention
7.5%
13/173 • Number of events 13 • Participants were screened for depressive symptoms (using the CES-D 20 item scale) at baseline (T1) and 2 weeks (T2), 12 weeks (T3), and 24 weeks post-intervention (T4).
10.1%
17/169 • Number of events 17 • Participants were screened for depressive symptoms (using the CES-D 20 item scale) at baseline (T1) and 2 weeks (T2), 12 weeks (T3), and 24 weeks post-intervention (T4).
Psychiatric disorders
Elevated depressive symptoms at T4: 24 weeks post-intervention
4.6%
8/173 • Number of events 8 • Participants were screened for depressive symptoms (using the CES-D 20 item scale) at baseline (T1) and 2 weeks (T2), 12 weeks (T3), and 24 weeks post-intervention (T4).
7.7%
13/169 • Number of events 13 • Participants were screened for depressive symptoms (using the CES-D 20 item scale) at baseline (T1) and 2 weeks (T2), 12 weeks (T3), and 24 weeks post-intervention (T4).

Additional Information

Dr. Carol M. Musil

Case Western Reserve University

Phone: 216-368-2545

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place