Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison of F-18 FDG and C-11 Acetate PET in Multiple Myeloma (NCT NCT03262389)

NCT ID: NCT03262389

Last Updated: 2021-03-16

Results Overview

The number of lesions detected in the scans will be averaged for each technique. Two techniques (scans) will be tested on Day 1 and two techniques (scans) will be tested on Day 2.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

10 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Day 1, Day 2

Results posted on

2021-03-16

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients
New diagnosis, high risk smoldering MM, relapse as defined by investigator. Participants received 4 different techniques of diagnosis: Fludeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) PET/MRI, Sodium Acetate (C-11 acetate) PET/CT, C-11 PET/MRI, and F-18 FDG PET/CT. Each participant received both PET drugs by both diagnostic techniques and is therefore included in the analysis population for the four reporting groups. Fludeoxyglucose: Route of administration was intravenous. Dose of each injection was the standard 5 to 10 millicurie (mCi). Sodium Acetate C11: Route of administration was intravenous. Dose of each injection was 10 mCi (370 MBq).
Overall Study
STARTED
10
Overall Study
COMPLETED
7
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients
New diagnosis, high risk smoldering MM, relapse as defined by investigator. Participants received 4 different techniques of diagnosis: Fludeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) PET/MRI, Sodium Acetate (C-11 acetate) PET/CT, C-11 PET/MRI, and F-18 FDG PET/CT. Each participant received both PET drugs by both diagnostic techniques and is therefore included in the analysis population for the four reporting groups. Fludeoxyglucose: Route of administration was intravenous. Dose of each injection was the standard 5 to 10 millicurie (mCi). Sodium Acetate C11: Route of administration was intravenous. Dose of each injection was 10 mCi (370 MBq).
Overall Study
Machine malfunction Day 1, no return Day 2
1
Overall Study
opted out of the study once his clinical FDG PET CT was done.
1
Overall Study
opted out of PET/MR
1

Baseline Characteristics

Comparison of F-18 FDG and C-11 Acetate PET in Multiple Myeloma

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients
n=10 Participants
New diagnosis, high risk smoldering MM, relapse as defined by investigator. Participants received 4 different techniques of diagnosis: Fludeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) PET/MRI, Sodium Acetate (C-11 acetate) PET/CT, C-11 PET/MRI, and F-18 FDG PET/CT. Each participant received both PET drugs by both diagnostic techniques and is therefore included in the analysis population for the four reporting groups. Fludeoxyglucose: Route of administration was intravenous. Dose of each injection was the standard 5 to 10 millicurie (mCi). Sodium Acetate C11: Route of administration was intravenous. Dose of each injection was 10 mCi (370 MBq).
Age, Continuous
64.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants
n=99 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1, Day 2

Population: Each participant received both PET drugs by both diagnostic techniques (scans) and is therefore included in the analysis population for the four reporting groups.

The number of lesions detected in the scans will be averaged for each technique. Two techniques (scans) will be tested on Day 1 and two techniques (scans) will be tested on Day 2.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients
n=7 Participants
New diagnosis, high risk smoldering MM, relapse as defined by investigator. Participants received 4 different techniques of diagnosis: Fludeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) PET/MRI, Sodium Acetate (C-11 acetate) PET/CT, C-11 PET/MRI, and F-18 FDG PET/CT. Each participant received both PET drugs by both diagnostic techniques and is therefore included in the analysis population for the four reporting groups. Fludeoxyglucose: Route of administration was intravenous. Dose of each injection was the standard 5 to 10 millicurie (mCi). Sodium Acetate C11: Route of administration was intravenous. Dose of each injection was 10 mCi (370 MBq).
Mean Multiple Myeloma Lesions Detected
C-11 acetate PET CT
4.6 number of lesions
Standard Deviation 5.1
Mean Multiple Myeloma Lesions Detected
C-11 acetate PET MRI
4.4 number of lesions
Standard Deviation 5.2
Mean Multiple Myeloma Lesions Detected
18 FDG PET CT
1.1 number of lesions
Standard Deviation 1.7
Mean Multiple Myeloma Lesions Detected
18 FDG PET MRI
1.0 number of lesions
Standard Deviation 1.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Approximately one month after Day 2

Population: Each participant received both PET drugs by both diagnostic techniques (scans) and is therefore included in the analysis population for the four reporting groups.

The visual image analysis scale has a range of 0-4: (0 no uptake; 1 benign, 2 probably benign, 3 probably malignant, 4 malignant).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients
n=7 Participants
New diagnosis, high risk smoldering MM, relapse as defined by investigator. Participants received 4 different techniques of diagnosis: Fludeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) PET/MRI, Sodium Acetate (C-11 acetate) PET/CT, C-11 PET/MRI, and F-18 FDG PET/CT. Each participant received both PET drugs by both diagnostic techniques and is therefore included in the analysis population for the four reporting groups. Fludeoxyglucose: Route of administration was intravenous. Dose of each injection was the standard 5 to 10 millicurie (mCi). Sodium Acetate C11: Route of administration was intravenous. Dose of each injection was 10 mCi (370 MBq).
Visual Image Analysis of Detected Multiple Myeloma Lesions
C-11 acetate PET CT
3.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
Visual Image Analysis of Detected Multiple Myeloma Lesions
C-11 acetate PET MRI
3.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
Visual Image Analysis of Detected Multiple Myeloma Lesions
18 FDG PET CT
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
Visual Image Analysis of Detected Multiple Myeloma Lesions
18 FDG PET MRI
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9

Adverse Events

Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Michael C. Roarke, M.D.

Mayo Clinic

Phone: 480-342-0988

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place