Compare the Aesthetic Effect of Different Thyroidectomies

NCT03239769 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120

Last updated 2017-08-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

One hundred twenty female patients who underwent thyroidectomy were evenly distributed into three groups: conventional access (CA), aesthetic principles access (APA) and minimally invasive access (MIA). The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was used as the assessment tool for the linear scar. After one year follow-up, the cosmetic outcomes were assessed.

Conditions

  • Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma (DTC)

Interventions

PROCEDURE

thyroidectomy

Thyroidectomies have different approaches. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the aesthetic effects of different access procedures in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Xiao Ma, Doctor · Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-06-01
Primary Completion
2015-06-01
Completion
2015-06-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03239769 on ClinicalTrials.gov