15 Years Outcomes Following Bioprosthetic vs Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement Between 50-65 Years
NCT03239509 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 1200
Last updated 2018-07-26
Summary
Currently there is an increase in the use of bioprosthesis worldwide (\> 70% according to national data of the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery).
There is conflicting evidence regarding the long-term survival of patients aged 50-65 years with mechanical (M) or biological (B) aortic prostheses. General consensus of greater complications associated with the use of long-life anticoagulation in M and of reoperation in B.
Similar survival with lower MACCE complications in bioprosthesis could reconsider their choice in patients aged 50-65 years, specially in the current TAVI era.
The investigators are going to perform a multicentric retrospective observational study (Registry) about 15 year-outcomes Following Bioprosthetic vs Mechanical Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Aged 50 to 65 Years in 5 Cardiovascular Surgery Centers in Andalousia (south Spain)
Conditions
- Surgery
- Survival, Prosthesis
- Valve Heart Disease
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
bioprosthesis implantation between 2000-2015
Implantation of a bioprosthesis in aortic position with cardiopulmonary bypass
- PROCEDURE
-
mechanical prosthesis implantation between 2000-2015
Implantation of a mechanical prosthesis in aortic position with cardiopulmonary bypass
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
EMILIANO A RODRIGUEZ-CAULO, MD, PhD · FIMABIS, HOSPITAL VIRGEN DE LA VICTORIA DE MÁLAGA
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 50 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2018-04-30
- Completion
- 2018-04-30
Countries
- Spain
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Association Between Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and Long-term Outcomes in 50 to 65-year-olds
NCT06782620 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Aortic Cross-clamp and Opening After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: a Real Issue?
NCT05721820 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Early Valve Replacement in Severe ASYmptomatic Aortic Stenosis Study
NCT04204915 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy of an Intervention Aimed At Reducing the Length of Stay After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
NCT04503655 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Three Types of Stented Pericardial Aortic Valves
NCT01522352 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Standard Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
NCT05261204 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Randomized Trial of TAVI vs. SAVR in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis at Low to Intermediate Risk of Mortality
NCT03112980 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Coronary and Structural Interventions - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
NCT02162069 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Symptomatic, Severe Aortic Stenosis
NCT02628899 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Geriatric Evaluation to Predict Mortality and Functional Recovery After Trans Aortic Valve Implantation
NCT02424370 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Perceval Aortic Bioprostheses : Durability Study.
NCT07116265 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Future Optimal Research and Care Evaluation - Aortic Stenosis
NCT06168123 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
CoreValve Advance-II Study: Prospective International Post-market Study
NCT01624870 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Safety & Efficacy Study of the Medtronic CoreValve® System-Treatment of Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis With Significant Comorbidities in Extreme Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement
NCT01675440 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Long-term Prognosis and Valve Durability of TAVR
NCT06379386 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Parasternal vs. Sternotomy Approach for Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement
NCT04632095 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Health Status of < 50 Year Old Patients After Surgically Implanted Biological and Mechanical Aortic Valves: a Population-based Retrospective Analysis (2010-2020)
NCT05627973 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of TAVR With SAVR in Younger Low Surgical Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
NCT02825134 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Versus Mini-Sternotomy for Aortic Valve Surgery
NCT00221663 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Behavior of Valve Leaflets Following Aortic Valve Implant
NCT03200574 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Validation of Accurate Commissural Alignment During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
NCT05097183 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Long-Term Effects of Aortic Valve Mismatch
NCT00854698 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
CoreValve Advance International Post Market Study
NCT01074658 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Bioprothetic Valve Versus Mechanical Valve of Bioprothetic Valve Versus Mechanical Valve
NCT06041308 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Safety and Efficacy Continued Access Study of the Medtronic CoreValve® System in the Treatment of Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis in Very High Risk Subjects and High Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement
NCT01531374 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA