Abatacept vs Tocilizumab for the Treatment of RA in TNF Alpha Inhibitor Inadequate Responders

NCT03227419 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 224

Last updated 2023-09-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common inflammatory rheumatoid disease in France, affecting 0.3% of the general population. Without effective treatment, the persistent inflammation causes invalidating pain and joint destruction, leading to major functional disability.

Biological agents have been proposed for patients with RA who have the most severe form of the disease and that are inadequate responder patients to conventional synthetic Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). TNF inhibitors (TNFi) are historically proposed as the first biological DAMRD for inadequate responder patients to csDMARDs. A diverse therapeutic arsenal has become available in recent years with the development of non-anti-TNFα drugs whose mechanisms of action are different from the classical TNFi. This new biotherapy class includes tocilizumab and abatacept, two drugs recently available for subcutaneous administration that enables ambulatory care for patients who would otherwise require repeated in-hospital care.

The role of these new treatments in the therapeutic strategy has been emphasized by studies that demonstrated their efficacy as first-line treatments. However, in clinical practice, TNFi remain the most common first-line treatment for the majority of patients, non-anti-TNFα biological agents being reserved for inadequate responder patients.

In second line, several studies have investigated therapeutic strategies for inadequate responder patients to TNFi. Current data suggest that it could be wise to change the therapeutic target after failure of a first-line treatment with TNFi.

Data about the comparative efficacy of different biologics proposed after failure of a first-line treatment with TNFi are in progress. Meta-analyses from registries and academic trials conducted in France and The Netherlands suggest that non-anti-TNFα agents would have equivalent or superior efficacy compared with a second TNFi. This finding suggests clinicians to switch for an alternate therapeutic target after failure of a first-line TNFi.

Data comparing different non-anti-TNFα biologics in inadequate responder patients to TNFi are scare. Industrial trials have demonstrated sustained biological efficacy of non-anti-TNFα biologics after failure of a TNFi. However, there is very little solid data on the direct comparison between them.

Conditions

  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Interventions

DRUG

Tocilizumab Prefilled Syringe

Treatment arm: tocilizumab (RoActemra®): 162 mg weekly a schema for therapeutic adaptation with injection intervals determined according to transaminase levels or blood cell counts (neutropenia, thrombopenia) as recommended by Roche-Chugaï (see table below).

DRUG

Abatacept Prefilled Syringe

Treatment arm: abatacept (Orencia®) 125 mg weekly after an initial dose of 500 mg (body weight \<60kg), 750 mg (body weight between 60 and 100 kg), or 1000 mg (body weight \>100 mg) 24 hours before the first subcutaneous injection.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Lille Catholic University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Pascart Tristan, MD · GHICL

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-01-22
Primary Completion
2024-09-30
Completion
2024-11-30

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03227419 on ClinicalTrials.gov