MedTrace Logo

Immediate vs Delayed Loading of Single Tooth Implants

NCT03216122 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24

Last updated 2021-12-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Previous studies have shown high success rates of immediately loaded implants on par with conventionally loaded implants (DL), while a few studies have also reported failure rates. Various studies can be found in the English literature comparing IL to DL protocol, few of which used the flapless approach while few used cylindrical implants or were confined to maxillary anterior region. Furthermore, a perusal of literature revealed no study which used RVG for radiographic evaluation and evaluated the morbidity at the implant site in normal healthy adult population. Hence this study would help determine whether the IL protocol is on par with DL protocol, so as to reduce patient waiting time, prevent space closure and provide early patient satisfaction from an aesthetic stand point.

Conditions

  • Implant Complication

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Conventional/Delayed Loading

PROCEDURE

Immediate Loading

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • SUBRAMONY BHAGAVATHEESWARAN · PGIDS ROHTAK

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-12-01
Primary Completion
2018-04-30
Completion
2021-10-31

Countries

  • India

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03216122 on ClinicalTrials.gov