How is the Term 'Harm' Being Interpreted and Documented on Hospice DNACPR Forms Following the Tracey Judgement?

NCT03195725 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 300

Last updated 2019-06-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To investigate how discussions surrounding Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions have changed following the Tracey judgement and how "harm" is being defined by clinicians working within specialist palliative care in a hospice setting.

Conditions

  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Interventions

OTHER

Review of notes

No intervention will occur

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust

    lead OTHER_GOV

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-07-24
Primary Completion
2018-10-31
Completion
2018-10-31

Countries

  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03195725 on ClinicalTrials.gov