Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study to Evaluate ISV-305 Compared to Vehicle for Treatment of Inflammation and Pain Associated With Cataract Surgery (NCT NCT03192137)
NCT ID: NCT03192137
Last Updated: 2021-11-19
Results Overview
Biomicroscopic measurement of anterior chamber cells was conducted in the surgery eye (study eye) by the same examiner from visit to visit whenever possible. A slit-lamp biomicroscope was used at x16 magnification with a 1 x 1 mm oblique high-intensity beam. Two cell counts were summed and divided by 2 to determine an average final anterior chamber cell count. This final cell count was converted to a grade: Grades 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 were assigned for cell counts of 0, 1 to 10, 11 to 20, 21 to 50, and \> 50, respectively. If the averaged count fell between two grades, the higher grade was selected (e.g., if the two counts were 10 and 11, the average of 10.5 fell into Grade 2). Missing anterior chamber cell grade at Day 15 was imputed by last non-missing scheduled post-baseline anterior chamber cell grade assessed prior to Day 15 (last observation carried forward).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
260 participants
Day 15
2021-11-19
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
ISV-305
ISV-305 was administered as a topical ophthalmic formulation of 0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2 vehicle (InSite Vision's drug delivery system) twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days.
|
Vehicle
Vehicle (DuraSite® 2 vehicle) was administered as a matching topical ophthalmic formulation without dexamethasone twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
173
|
87
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
123
|
29
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
50
|
58
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
ISV-305
ISV-305 was administered as a topical ophthalmic formulation of 0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2 vehicle (InSite Vision's drug delivery system) twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days.
|
Vehicle
Vehicle (DuraSite® 2 vehicle) was administered as a matching topical ophthalmic formulation without dexamethasone twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
10
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
20
|
37
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
4
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Surgery Cancelled
|
4
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Other - Various Administrative Reasons
|
8
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study to Evaluate ISV-305 Compared to Vehicle for Treatment of Inflammation and Pain Associated With Cataract Surgery
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
ISV-305
n=158 Participants
ISV-305 was administered as a topical ophthalmic formulation of 0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2 vehicle (InSite Vision's drug delivery system) twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days.
|
Vehicle
n=80 Participants
Vehicle (DuraSite® 2 vehicle) was administered as a matching topical ophthalmic formulation without dexamethasone twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days.
|
Total
n=238 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
68.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.15 • n=99 Participants
|
68.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.37 • n=107 Participants
|
68.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.95 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
94 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
137 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
64 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
101 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
141 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
72 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
213 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 15Population: mITT Population - included randomized participants who underwent cataract surgery, received at least one dose of ISV-305 or vehicle, and had at least one post-surgery efficacy assessment (ACC or VAS). Participants who received rescue medications were included in the mITT Population, but were treated as failures.
Biomicroscopic measurement of anterior chamber cells was conducted in the surgery eye (study eye) by the same examiner from visit to visit whenever possible. A slit-lamp biomicroscope was used at x16 magnification with a 1 x 1 mm oblique high-intensity beam. Two cell counts were summed and divided by 2 to determine an average final anterior chamber cell count. This final cell count was converted to a grade: Grades 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 were assigned for cell counts of 0, 1 to 10, 11 to 20, 21 to 50, and \> 50, respectively. If the averaged count fell between two grades, the higher grade was selected (e.g., if the two counts were 10 and 11, the average of 10.5 fell into Grade 2). Missing anterior chamber cell grade at Day 15 was imputed by last non-missing scheduled post-baseline anterior chamber cell grade assessed prior to Day 15 (last observation carried forward).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ISV-305
n=144 Participants
ISV-305 was administered as a topical ophthalmic formulation of 0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2 vehicle (InSite Vision's drug delivery system) twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days.
|
Vehicle
n=72 Participants
Vehicle (DuraSite® 2 vehicle) was administered as a matching topical ophthalmic formulation without dexamethasone twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population
0 (did not receive rescue therapy)
|
69 participants
|
16 participants
|
|
Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population
0 (received rescue therapy)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population
1
|
64 participants
|
30 participants
|
|
Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population
2
|
5 participants
|
10 participants
|
|
Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population
3
|
6 participants
|
12 participants
|
|
Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population
4
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 29Population: mITT Population - included randomized participants who underwent cataract surgery, received at least one dose of ISV-305 or vehicle, and had at least one post-surgery efficacy assessment (ACC or VAS). Participants who received rescue medications were included in the mITT Population but were treated as failures.
Eye pain/discomfort in the study eye was evaluated at every visit except Visit 2 (Surgery; Day 0) using a VAS, scoring from 0 to 100 using a mark on a 100 mm line (0 = absent; 100 = maximum). Participants were asked to rate the feeling of the symptom in the study eye from absent to extreme by moving a slide on the side of the scale to align with images of descriptive faces.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ISV-305
n=156 Participants
ISV-305 was administered as a topical ophthalmic formulation of 0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2 vehicle (InSite Vision's drug delivery system) twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days.
|
Vehicle
n=77 Participants
Vehicle (DuraSite® 2 vehicle) was administered as a matching topical ophthalmic formulation without dexamethasone twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants Who Achieved a Pain Score of 0 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Each Post-surgical Assessment
Pain Score of 0 on Day 1
|
103 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Participants Who Achieved a Pain Score of 0 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Each Post-surgical Assessment
Pain Score of 0 on Day 8
|
133 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Participants Who Achieved a Pain Score of 0 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Each Post-surgical Assessment
Pain Score of 0 on Day 15
|
137 Participants
|
49 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Participants Who Achieved a Pain Score of 0 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Each Post-surgical Assessment
Pain Score of 0 on Day 18
|
129 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Participants Who Achieved a Pain Score of 0 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Each Post-surgical Assessment
Pain Score of 0 on Day 29
|
135 Participants
|
51 Participants
|
Adverse Events
ISV-305
Vehicle
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
ISV-305
n=158 participants at risk
ISV-305 was administered as a topical ophthalmic formulation of 0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2 vehicle (InSite Vision's drug delivery system) twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days.
|
Vehicle
n=80 participants at risk
Vehicle (DuraSite® 2 vehicle) was administered as a matching topical ophthalmic formulation without dexamethasone twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.63%
1/158 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
0.63%
1/158 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
|
Investigations
Blood magnesium decreased
|
0.63%
1/158 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.63%
1/158 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary thrombosis
|
0.63%
1/158 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
0.00%
0/80 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
ISV-305
n=158 participants at risk
ISV-305 was administered as a topical ophthalmic formulation of 0.1% dexamethasone in DuraSite® 2 vehicle (InSite Vision's drug delivery system) twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days.
|
Vehicle
n=80 participants at risk
Vehicle (DuraSite® 2 vehicle) was administered as a matching topical ophthalmic formulation without dexamethasone twice daily (one drop in the morning and one drop in the evening) for 16 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Iritis
|
3.8%
6/158 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
6.2%
5/80 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual acuity reduced
|
4.4%
7/158 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
2.5%
2/80 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pain
|
1.9%
3/158 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
5.0%
4/80 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
|
Eye disorders
Cystoid macular oedema
|
1.3%
2/158 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
3.8%
3/80 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye inflammation
|
0.63%
1/158 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
5.0%
4/80 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
|
Eye disorders
Foreign body sensation in eyes
|
1.3%
2/158 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
3.8%
3/80 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual impairment
|
2.5%
4/158 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
1.2%
1/80 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
|
Investigations
Intraocular pressure increased
|
6.3%
10/158 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
2.5%
2/80 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.63%
1/158 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
2.5%
2/80 • Adverse events (AEs) were reported from the date of signing the consent form to the date of completion of the participant's final visit (Day 29). Ongoing AEs were followed beyond the final study visit at the discretion of the investigator.
Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the Safety Population, which included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (i.e., 158 and 80 subjects in the ISV-305 and Vehicle arms, respectively).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The investigator agrees to submit the manuscript of any journal article, abstract or other presentation arising from an InSite Vision-sponsored clinical investigation to InSite Vision for editorial review prior to submission for publication or presentation. At the sponsor's request, if proprietary information is to be disclosed, proposed publications or presentations will be delayed until appropriate patent applications and/or legal documents of a similar nature have been filed.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER