BicepsTenodesis vs. Biceps Debridement in Combined RC Tears and SLAP Lesions
NCT03189147 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2021-09-22
Summary
The appropriate treatment of labral lesions such as SLAP tears in patients undergoing RC tears repair is controversial. Most surgeons are reluctant to repair RC and SLAP tears simultaneously due to the high likelihood of prolonged postoperative immobilization, stiffness and poor clinical outcomes. The current standard care interventions include debridement, biceps tenotomy or tenodesis rather than surgical repair of SLAP tears. Simple debridement is a low cost and time-saving procedure that has the advantage of maintaining the anatomy of the long head of biceps (LHB), a muscle that acts as an active depressor of the head of the humerus in patients with RC tears. Biceps tenotomy is also low cost and time-saving; however, since the LHB is released from its attachment in the shoulder joint, the anatomy is not preserved and results in decreased strength and possible development of a 'Popeye' deformity. Biceps tenodesis has higher costs and time than the other two approaches, but has the advantage of preserving the LHB anatomy and power, and a lower possibility of developing complications. Finally, labral repair has the highest costs and associated surgical time and may lead to increase stiffness after surgery, particularly in patients over 45 years old.
Currently, the standard care of the surgeons involved in this study is to use either debridement or biceps tenodesis to address labral lesions in patients undergoing surgery for their RC tear. Based on the current evidence and current practice in our facility, we aim to compare the efficacy of tenodesis versus debridement in patients with combined RC tear, degenerative labrum (SLAP tears) and a normal biceps tendon.
Conditions
- SLAP Lesion
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Biceps Tenodesis
Surgical procedure that is usually performed for the treatment of labral lesions in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
- PROCEDURE
-
Debridement
Surgical procedure that is usually performed for the treatment of labral lesions in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Alberta
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 35 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-01-15
- Primary Completion
- 2019-08-29
- Completion
- 2019-08-29
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
SLAP Repair vs. Biceps Tenodesis in Patients Under 30: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT04494932 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biceps Tenodesis with 360 Suture Anchor Versus Self Locking Tenodesis in the Absence of Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT06772103 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Self-locking Tenodesis of the Long Chief of the Biceps Vs. Lasso 360 Tenodesis in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT06774820 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Post-op Rehabilitation's Influence on Tendon Healing & Clinical Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT00756015 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biceps Tenodesis Versus Tenotomy
NCT01747902 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3T MRI Versus MR Arthrogram in SLAP Lesions
NCT01896947 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Therapeutic Exercise for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy / Subacromial Pain Syndrome - Outcomes and Mechanisms
NCT04923477 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of the Biceps With Concomitant Supraspinatus Tears
NCT05660031 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Methods of Subscapularis Management in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Tenotomy Versus Peel
NCT01404143 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Arthroscopic Transosseous vs. Anchored Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT03797287 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Results of Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT01549912 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Study Comparing Patient Function and Satisfaction With Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression Before and After Repair of Complete Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT01430598 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Early Mobilization Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT01333527 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Intraoperative Repair Tension on Postoperative Healing of Full-thickness Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT03318627 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Use of Postop Sling After Biceps Tenodesis
NCT05558579 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Tenotomy or Tenodesis of Long Head Biceps in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT02655848 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Mobilization Following Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT01741272 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Rotator Cuff Repair With Arthroscopic Acromioplasty (Shaving the Acromion Bone) Versus Repair Without Acromioplasty
NCT00664794 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Role of Postoperative Immobilization After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT02050087 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Post-operative Mobilisation After Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT02943005 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Rehabilitation of Reconstructed Shoulder Rotator Cuff
NCT01499992 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Applicability of 3T Shoulder MRI in Detection of Labral Pathology
NCT06043791 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Novel Treatment for Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT05590494 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Arthroscopic Rotator Interval Closure in Shoulder Instability Repair
NCT00901797 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness of Early Versus Conservative Rehabilitation Following Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT07324174 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA