Trial Outcomes & Findings for Decision Aids to Improve Knowledge in Patients With Prostate Cancer (NCT NCT03182998)

NCT ID: NCT03182998

Last Updated: 2023-08-02

Results Overview

The primary outcome, knowledge, will be assessed by a standardized questionnaire (i.e., Prostate Cancer Treatment Questionnaire) administered once, immediately after the clinical consultation while the patient is still at the study site. The number correct from this 12-item measure will be reduced to a proportion of total number correct. With 1.0 (12 out of 12 item average) being the best possible outcome and 0.0 (0 out of 12 item average) the worst possible outcome

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

103 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

12 months

Results posted on

2023-08-02

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Arm A (Knowing Your Options)
Arm A ("Knowing your Options") Patients receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid before their consultation visit. Internet-Based Intervention: Receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Arm B (Prostate Choice)
Patients receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid during their consultation visit. Internet-Based Intervention: Receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Arm C (Usual Care)
Patients undergo usual care. Best Practice: Undergo usual care Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Overall Study
STARTED
37
33
33
Overall Study
COMPLETED
36
33
33
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Decision Aids to Improve Knowledge in Patients With Prostate Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Arm A (Knowing Your Options)
n=37 Participants
Arm A ("Knowing your Options") Patients receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid before their consultation visit. Internet-Based Intervention: Receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Arm B (Prostate Choice)
n=33 Participants
Patients receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid during their consultation visit. Internet-Based Intervention: Receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Arm C (Usual Care)
n=33 Participants
Patients undergo usual care. Best Practice: Undergo usual care Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Total
n=103 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
63.49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.57 • n=99 Participants
65.16 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.25 • n=107 Participants
64.52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.07 • n=206 Participants
64.34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.97 • n=7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
37 Participants
n=99 Participants
33 Participants
n=107 Participants
33 Participants
n=206 Participants
103 Participants
n=7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
35 Participants
n=99 Participants
30 Participants
n=107 Participants
31 Participants
n=206 Participants
96 Participants
n=7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
6 Participants
n=206 Participants
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants
n=99 Participants
22 Participants
n=107 Participants
23 Participants
n=206 Participants
69 Participants
n=7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
37 Participants
n=99 Participants
33 Participants
n=107 Participants
33 Participants
n=206 Participants
103 Participants
n=7 Participants
Treatment Preferred
Surgery
15 Participants
n=99 Participants
13 Participants
n=107 Participants
16 Participants
n=206 Participants
44 Participants
n=7 Participants
Treatment Preferred
Radiation
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
8 Participants
n=206 Participants
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
Treatment Preferred
Active surveillance
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
Treatment Preferred
Unsure
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
10 Participants
n=107 Participants
5 Participants
n=206 Participants
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
Treatment Preferred
Missing
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

The primary outcome, knowledge, will be assessed by a standardized questionnaire (i.e., Prostate Cancer Treatment Questionnaire) administered once, immediately after the clinical consultation while the patient is still at the study site. The number correct from this 12-item measure will be reduced to a proportion of total number correct. With 1.0 (12 out of 12 item average) being the best possible outcome and 0.0 (0 out of 12 item average) the worst possible outcome

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Knowing Your Options)
n=36 Participants
Arm A ("Knowing your Options") Patients receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid before their consultation visit. Internet-Based Intervention: Receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Arm B (Prostate Choice)
n=33 Participants
Patients receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid during their consultation visit. Internet-Based Intervention: Receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Arm C (Usual Care)
n=33 Participants
Patients undergo usual care. Best Practice: Undergo usual care Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Knowledge Assessed by Prostate Cancer Treatment Questionnaire
0.69 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
0.69 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
0.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Population: Secondary outcomes were to be based on data collected at 12 months. Two of our sites (enrolling \>50% of study participants) experienced staff turnover and/or loss of contact with participants. As a result, we lost our ability and opportunity to maintain contact with nearly all participants at both sites and were unable to collect secondary outcome data at 12 months. Results reported here reflect the data we were able to collect.

The Decisional Regret Scale is a short, 5-item scale measuring "distress or remorse after a (health care) decision." The instrument has been validated in other decision aid studies. Questions are answered on a 5-point agreement scale. A score of 0 means no decisional regret and 5 is the maximum level of regret. The continuous scores were then grouped into two categories, 0 (no regret) and 1+ (at least some regret).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Knowing Your Options)
n=5 Participants
Arm A ("Knowing your Options") Patients receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid before their consultation visit. Internet-Based Intervention: Receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Arm B (Prostate Choice)
n=5 Participants
Patients receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid during their consultation visit. Internet-Based Intervention: Receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Arm C (Usual Care)
n=7 Participants
Patients undergo usual care. Best Practice: Undergo usual care Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Decisional Quality as Measured by Decisional Regret Scale
Decisional Regret Total score of 0
2 Participants
3 Participants
2 Participants
Decisional Quality as Measured by Decisional Regret Scale
Decisional Regret Total score of 1+
3 Participants
2 Participants
5 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Population: Secondary outcomes were to be based on data collected at 12 months. Two of our sites (enrolling \>50% of study participants) experienced staff turnover and/or loss of contact with participants. As a result, we lost our ability and opportunity to maintain contact with nearly all participants at both sites and were unable to collect secondary outcome data at 12 months. Results reported here reflect the data we were able to collect.

The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composit (EPIC-26) measures health-related quality of life and returns summary scores for urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains with high test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Scores will be converted into continuous summary scores using standard algorithms. For the EPIC-26 questionnaire, scores were transformed into 0 to 100 scales, with a score of 0 represented the worst possible health-related quality of life and a score of 100 representing the most favorable health-related quality of life. The questionnaire will be administered once; 12 months after the patient's initial consultation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Knowing Your Options)
n=5 Participants
Arm A ("Knowing your Options") Patients receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid before their consultation visit. Internet-Based Intervention: Receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Arm B (Prostate Choice)
n=6 Participants
Patients receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid during their consultation visit. Internet-Based Intervention: Receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Arm C (Usual Care)
n=7 Participants
Patients undergo usual care. Best Practice: Undergo usual care Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Quality of Life Assessed by Questionnaire
Urinary Incontinence
79.7 score on a scale
Interval 58.5 to 100.0
67.2 score on a scale
Interval 16.5 to 93.8
85.8 score on a scale
Interval 60.5 to 100.0
Quality of Life Assessed by Questionnaire
Urinary Irritative
80.0 score on a scale
Interval 43.8 to 93.8
90.0 score on a scale
Interval 81.2 to 100.0
83.9 score on a scale
Interval 56.2 to 100.0
Quality of Life Assessed by Questionnaire
Bowel
86.7 score on a scale
Interval 62.5 to 100.0
72.9 score on a scale
Interval 29.2 to 100.0
92.3 score on a scale
Interval 58.3 to 100.0
Quality of Life Assessed by Questionnaire
Sexual
29.4 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 70.8
35.1 score on a scale
Interval 12.5 to 73.7
20.2 score on a scale
Interval 16.7 to 27.8
Quality of Life Assessed by Questionnaire
Hormonal
86.0 score on a scale
Interval 60.0 to 100.0
80.0 score on a scale
Interval 60.0 to 95.0
76.4 score on a scale
Interval 60.0 to 100.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Population: Secondary outcomes were to be based on data collected at 12 months. Treatment choice could be ascertained immediately upon patient treatment selection. Two of our sites (enrolling \>50% of study participants) experienced staff turnover and/or loss of contact with participants. As a result, we lost our ability and opportunity to maintain contact with several participants and were unable to collect treatment choice for all participants. Results reported reflect the data we were able to collect.

Will be categorized by the type of treatment the patient elected to receive. Will be compared across intervention arms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A (Knowing Your Options)
n=26 Participants
Arm A ("Knowing your Options") Patients receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid before their consultation visit. Internet-Based Intervention: Receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Arm B (Prostate Choice)
n=21 Participants
Patients receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid during their consultation visit. Internet-Based Intervention: Receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Arm C (Usual Care)
n=24 Participants
Patients undergo usual care. Best Practice: Undergo usual care Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Utilization as Determined by Chart Review
Brachytherapy
4 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
Utilization as Determined by Chart Review
Radical prostatectomy
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Utilization as Determined by Chart Review
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Utilization as Determined by Chart Review
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
14 Participants
14 Participants
12 Participants
Utilization as Determined by Chart Review
Cryosurgery
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Utilization as Determined by Chart Review
Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
3 Participants
6 Participants
8 Participants
Utilization as Determined by Chart Review
Proton beam
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Utilization as Determined by Chart Review
Hormone therapy
4 Participants
4 Participants
10 Participants
Utilization as Determined by Chart Review
Chemotherapy
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Utilization as Determined by Chart Review
Active surveillance
3 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants

Adverse Events

Arm A (Knowing Your Options)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Arm B (Prostate Choice)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Arm C (Usual Care)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Jon C. Tilburt, MD, MPH

Mayo Clinic

Phone: 480-301-3401

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place