Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of EXPAREL When Administered Via Infiltration Into the TAP vs. Bupivacaine Alone in Subjects Undergoing Elective C-Sections (NCT NCT03176459)
NCT ID: NCT03176459
Last Updated: 2021-01-06
Results Overview
The primary endpoint is the total postsurgical opioid consumption (mg) in oral morphine equivalent dose (OMED) through 72 hours.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
186 participants
0-72 hours
2021-01-06
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266mg + Immediate Release (IR) Bupivacaine
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL EXPAREL (266 mg) combined with 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg bupivacaine HCl or 44 mg bupivacaine HCl free base equivalents, calculated as 0.886 mg bupivacaine HCl free base = 1.0 mg bupivacaine HCl equivalents) and 20 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the transversus abdominis plane (TAP), with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
IR Bupivacaine
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg) combined with 40 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the TAP, with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
96
|
90
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
91
|
83
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266mg + Immediate Release (IR) Bupivacaine
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL EXPAREL (266 mg) combined with 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg bupivacaine HCl or 44 mg bupivacaine HCl free base equivalents, calculated as 0.886 mg bupivacaine HCl free base = 1.0 mg bupivacaine HCl equivalents) and 20 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the transversus abdominis plane (TAP), with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
IR Bupivacaine
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg) combined with 40 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the TAP, with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
5
|
7
|
Baseline Characteristics
Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of EXPAREL When Administered Via Infiltration Into the TAP vs. Bupivacaine Alone in Subjects Undergoing Elective C-Sections
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266mg + Immediate Release (IR) Bupivacaine
n=97 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL EXPAREL (266 mg) combined with 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg bupivacaine HCl or 44 mg bupivacaine HCl free base equivalents, calculated as 0.886 mg bupivacaine HCl free base = 1.0 mg bupivacaine HCl equivalents) and 20 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the transversus abdominis plane (TAP), with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
IR Bupivacaine
n=89 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg) combined with 40 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the TAP, with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
Total
n=186 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
33.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.37 • n=99 Participants
|
33.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.43 • n=107 Participants
|
33.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.94 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
97 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
89 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
186 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
12 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
84 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
78 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
162 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
13 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
67 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
64 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
131 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
11 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
97 participants
n=99 Participants
|
89 participants
n=107 Participants
|
186 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
American Society of Anesthesiologists classification
ASA 1
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
American Society of Anesthesiologists classification
ASA 2
|
90 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
80 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
170 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
American Society of Anesthesiologists classification
ASA 3
|
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-72 hoursPopulation: Efficacy analysis set (also the modified intent-to-treat \[mITT\] analysis set) included all randomized subjects in the safety analysis set who underwent C-section and who also met the study criteria for correct TAP placement, local anesthetic dosing, and a multimodal post-operative analgesic regimen, with analysis based on randomized treatment (regardless of treatment received)
The primary endpoint is the total postsurgical opioid consumption (mg) in oral morphine equivalent dose (OMED) through 72 hours.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266mg + Immediate Release (IR) Bupivacaine
n=71 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL EXPAREL (266 mg) combined with 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg bupivacaine HCl or 44 mg bupivacaine HCl free base equivalents, calculated as 0.886 mg bupivacaine HCl free base = 1.0 mg bupivacaine HCl equivalents) and 20 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the transversus abdominis plane (TAP), with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
IR Bupivacaine
n=65 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg) combined with 40 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the TAP, with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Total Postsurgical Opioid Consumption Through 72 Hours After TAP Infiltration During Elective Cesarean Section
|
15.5 MED, mg
Standard Error 6.67
|
32.0 MED, mg
Standard Error 6.25
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-72 hoursPopulation: Efficacy analysis set (also the modified intent-to-treat \[mITT\] analysis set) included all randomized subjects in the safety analysis set who underwent C-section and who also met the study criteria for correct TAP placement, local anesthetic dosing, and a multimodal post-operative analgesic regimen, with analysis based on randomized treatment (regardless of treatment received)
AUC for VAS pain scores through 72 hours. Pain intensity scores were measured on a 10-cm VAS (0 cm= "no pain" to 30 cm="pain as bad as it could be"). Subjects were evaluated for pain intensity scores at rest using the 10-cm VAS at rest at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, and 72 hours after surgery and then once daily (at noon ± 4 hours) through Day 14. To assess pain intensity (VAS) at rest, the subject should rest quietly in a supine or seated position that does not exacerbate her postsurgical pain for 3-5 minutes before entering the pain score. While in the hospital, subjects are to assess, "How much pain are you experiencing right now?" and a vertical mark is placed on a 10-cm straight line to indicate the level of pain experienced at the time of assessment. Note higher AUC means more pain over time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266mg + Immediate Release (IR) Bupivacaine
n=70 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL EXPAREL (266 mg) combined with 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg bupivacaine HCl or 44 mg bupivacaine HCl free base equivalents, calculated as 0.886 mg bupivacaine HCl free base = 1.0 mg bupivacaine HCl equivalents) and 20 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the transversus abdominis plane (TAP), with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
IR Bupivacaine
n=65 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg) combined with 40 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the TAP, with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores Through 72 Hours
|
147.9 cm*hr
Standard Error 21.13
|
178.5 cm*hr
Standard Error 19.78
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-72 hoursPopulation: Efficacy analysis set (also the modified intent-to-treat \[mITT\] analysis set) included all randomized subjects in the safety analysis set who underwent C-section and who also met the study criteria for correct TAP placement, local anesthetic dosing, and a multimodal post-operative analgesic regimen, with analysis based on randomized treatment (regardless of treatment received)
Subjects were considered opioid-spared if: * For 0-72 hours opioid consumption, all doses add up to ≤15mg (oral morphine equivalent dose \[OMED\]) * AND the overall benefit of anesthesia score (OBAS) score was 0 for questions 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. For the OBAS questionnaire, 0 is considered minimal pain and 4 is considered maximum imaginable pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266mg + Immediate Release (IR) Bupivacaine
n=71 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL EXPAREL (266 mg) combined with 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg bupivacaine HCl or 44 mg bupivacaine HCl free base equivalents, calculated as 0.886 mg bupivacaine HCl free base = 1.0 mg bupivacaine HCl equivalents) and 20 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the transversus abdominis plane (TAP), with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
IR Bupivacaine
n=65 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg) combined with 40 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the TAP, with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Opioid Spared Subjects Through 72 Hours
|
53.5 percent of participants
|
24.7 percent of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-24 hoursPopulation: Efficacy analysis set (also the modified intent-to-treat \[mITT\] analysis set) included all randomized subjects in the safety analysis set who underwent C-section and who also met the study criteria for correct TAP placement, local anesthetic dosing, and a multimodal post-operative analgesic regimen, with analysis based on randomized treatment (regardless of treatment received)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266mg + Immediate Release (IR) Bupivacaine
n=71 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL EXPAREL (266 mg) combined with 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg bupivacaine HCl or 44 mg bupivacaine HCl free base equivalents, calculated as 0.886 mg bupivacaine HCl free base = 1.0 mg bupivacaine HCl equivalents) and 20 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the transversus abdominis plane (TAP), with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
IR Bupivacaine
n=65 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg) combined with 40 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the TAP, with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Total Postsurgical Opioid Consumption Through 24 Hours
|
2.4 MED mg
Standard Error 1.82
|
5.6 MED mg
Standard Error 1.70
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-48 hoursPopulation: Efficacy analysis set (also the modified intent-to-treat \[mITT\] analysis set) included all randomized subjects in the safety analysis set who underwent C-section and who also met the study criteria for correct TAP placement, local anesthetic dosing, and a multimodal post-operative analgesic regimen, with analysis based on randomized treatment (regardless of treatment received)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266mg + Immediate Release (IR) Bupivacaine
n=71 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL EXPAREL (266 mg) combined with 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg bupivacaine HCl or 44 mg bupivacaine HCl free base equivalents, calculated as 0.886 mg bupivacaine HCl free base = 1.0 mg bupivacaine HCl equivalents) and 20 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the transversus abdominis plane (TAP), with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
IR Bupivacaine
n=65 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg) combined with 40 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the TAP, with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Total Postsurgical Opioid Consumption Through 48 Hours
|
9.1 MED mg
Standard Error 4.46
|
20.5 MED mg
Standard Error 4.18
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-168 hoursPopulation: Efficacy analysis set (also the modified intent-to-treat \[mITT\] analysis set) included all randomized subjects in the safety analysis set who underwent C-section and who also met the study criteria for correct TAP placement, local anesthetic dosing, and a multimodal post-operative analgesic regimen, with analysis based on randomized treatment (regardless of treatment received)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266mg + Immediate Release (IR) Bupivacaine
n=71 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL EXPAREL (266 mg) combined with 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg bupivacaine HCl or 44 mg bupivacaine HCl free base equivalents, calculated as 0.886 mg bupivacaine HCl free base = 1.0 mg bupivacaine HCl equivalents) and 20 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the transversus abdominis plane (TAP), with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
IR Bupivacaine
n=65 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg) combined with 40 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the TAP, with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Total Postsurgical Opioid Consumption Through 168 Hours (Day 7)
|
23.3 MED mg
Standard Error 9.75
|
45.8 MED mg
Standard Error 9.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-336 hoursPopulation: Efficacy analysis set (also the modified intent-to-treat \[mITT\] analysis set) included all randomized subjects in the safety analysis set who underwent C-section and who also met the study criteria for correct TAP placement, local anesthetic dosing, and a multimodal post-operative analgesic regimen, with analysis based on randomized treatment (regardless of treatment received)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266mg + Immediate Release (IR) Bupivacaine
n=71 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL EXPAREL (266 mg) combined with 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg bupivacaine HCl or 44 mg bupivacaine HCl free base equivalents, calculated as 0.886 mg bupivacaine HCl free base = 1.0 mg bupivacaine HCl equivalents) and 20 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the transversus abdominis plane (TAP), with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
IR Bupivacaine
n=65 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg) combined with 40 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the TAP, with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Total Postsurgical Opioid Consumption Through 336 Hours (Day 14)
|
28.2 MED mg
Standard Error 11.20
|
47.8 MED mg
Standard Error 10.49
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the end of surgeryPopulation: Efficacy analysis set (also the modified intent-to-treat \[mITT\] analysis set) included all randomized subjects in the safety analysis set who underwent C-section and who also met the study criteria for correct TAP placement, local anesthetic dosing, and a multimodal post-operative analgesic regimen, with analysis based on randomized treatment (regardless of treatment received)
The time to a subject's first use of an opioid medication for breakthrough pain after the end of surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266mg + Immediate Release (IR) Bupivacaine
n=71 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL EXPAREL (266 mg) combined with 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg bupivacaine HCl or 44 mg bupivacaine HCl free base equivalents, calculated as 0.886 mg bupivacaine HCl free base = 1.0 mg bupivacaine HCl equivalents) and 20 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the transversus abdominis plane (TAP), with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
IR Bupivacaine
n=65 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg) combined with 40 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the TAP, with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to First Rescue Medication Use
|
53.2 hours
Interval 2.3 to 345.2
|
41.1 hours
Interval 2.5 to 345.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-72 hoursPopulation: Efficacy analysis set (also the modified intent-to-treat \[mITT\] analysis set) included all randomized subjects in the safety analysis set who underwent C-section and who also met the study criteria for correct TAP placement, local anesthetic dosing, and a multimodal post-operative analgesic regimen, with analysis based on randomized treatment (regardless of treatment received)
Percentage of subjects who did not received an opioid rescue medication starting from the end of surgery through 72 hours
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EXPAREL 266mg + Immediate Release (IR) Bupivacaine
n=71 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL EXPAREL (266 mg) combined with 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg bupivacaine HCl or 44 mg bupivacaine HCl free base equivalents, calculated as 0.886 mg bupivacaine HCl free base = 1.0 mg bupivacaine HCl equivalents) and 20 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the transversus abdominis plane (TAP), with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
IR Bupivacaine
n=65 Participants
60 mL of a study drug mixture containing 20 mL bupivacaine HCl 0.25% (50 mg) combined with 40 mL normal saline (total mixture 60 mL) administered into the TAP, with half of the volume (30 mL) administered to each side of the abdomen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Opioid-Free Subjects Through 72 Hours
|
51.9 percent of opioid-free participants
|
48.6 percent of opioid-free participants
|
Adverse Events
EXPAREL+Bupivacaine TAP Infiltration
Active Bupivacaine TAP Infiltration
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
EXPAREL+Bupivacaine TAP Infiltration
n=97 participants at risk
Receive a single 20-mL dose of EXPAREL 266 mg expanded in volume with 20 mL normal saline plus 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine for a total volume of 60 mL.
Exparel + Bupivacaine: EXPAREL is a local analgesic that utilizes bupivacaine in combination with the proven product delivery platform, DepoFoam®.
|
Active Bupivacaine TAP Infiltration
n=89 participants at risk
Receive 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine expanded in volume with 40 mL normal saline for a total volume of 60 mL
Bupivacaine: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride is indicated for the production of local or regional anesthesia or analgesia for surgery, dental and oral surgery procedures, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and for obstetrical procedures.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiomyopathy
|
1.0%
1/97 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
0.00%
0/89 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal wall hematoma
|
1.0%
1/97 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
0.00%
0/89 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Panic attack
|
1.0%
1/97 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
0.00%
0/89 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Retained placenta or membranes
|
0.00%
0/97 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
1.1%
1/89 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Gestational hypertension
|
0.00%
0/97 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
1.1%
1/89 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Postpartum hemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/97 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
1.1%
1/89 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/97 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
1.1%
1/89 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
EXPAREL+Bupivacaine TAP Infiltration
n=97 participants at risk
Receive a single 20-mL dose of EXPAREL 266 mg expanded in volume with 20 mL normal saline plus 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine for a total volume of 60 mL.
Exparel + Bupivacaine: EXPAREL is a local analgesic that utilizes bupivacaine in combination with the proven product delivery platform, DepoFoam®.
|
Active Bupivacaine TAP Infiltration
n=89 participants at risk
Receive 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine expanded in volume with 40 mL normal saline for a total volume of 60 mL
Bupivacaine: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride is indicated for the production of local or regional anesthesia or analgesia for surgery, dental and oral surgery procedures, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and for obstetrical procedures.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
6.2%
6/97 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
4.5%
4/89 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
24.7%
24/97 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
12.4%
11/89 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
12.4%
12/97 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
6.7%
6/89 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
3.1%
3/97 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
5.6%
5/89 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
6.2%
6/97 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
5.6%
5/89 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
6.2%
6/97 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
11.2%
10/89 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
pruritis
|
27.8%
27/97 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
31.5%
28/89 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
5.2%
5/97 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
3.4%
3/89 • Screening through postsurgical Day 14
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans whether or not considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug without any judgment about causality. Serious AEs were defined as per clinicaltrials.gov.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Results conducted at Site shall not be published before 1st multicenter publication by Sponsor but can proceed if there is no such publication ≤18 months after study completion/termination at all sites and all data have been received. Before submitting manuscript/materials to an outside person/entity, site shall give Sponsor 60 days to review and comment. Site shall, upon request, further delay publication/presentation for ≤120 days to allow Sponsor to protect its interests in Inventions.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER