Lower Femtosecond Laser Energy Levels Lead to Better Visual Recovery After Small-incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia
NCT03111160 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150
Last updated 2017-04-12
Summary
Small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), the most recently developed refractive surgical technique, is being performed in a growing number of cases. This intrastromal keratomileusis using only a femtosecond laser is a new procedure that extracts the refractive lenticule through a small corneal incision ranging from 2 to 5 mm, with the absence of a flap and the preservation of the anterior-most stromal lamellae and Bowman's layer (except for the region of the small incision). Many studies have demonstrated that SMILE achieved comparable or superior efficacy, safety, and predictability to femtosecond laser -assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx). However, the recovery of visual acuity in the early postoperative period after SMILE is slower, compared to other refractive surgery techniques. Therefore, adjusting energy might improve postoperative visual acuity and recovery time after SMILE. Nevertheless, the optimal parameters drawn from a well-organized randomized study have yet to be elucidated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the optimal femtosecond laser energy, with the aim of improving clinical outcomes during the early postoperative period after SMILE for the correction of myopia. To this end, we used a 500 kHz VisuMax with spot-spacing control at energy levels lower than 115 nJ, based on the previous studies. Therefore, we prospectively compared visual outcomes of two groups randomly divided by different laser energies: one underwent SMILE using lower energy levels of 100, 105, and 110 nJ (L-SMILE), while the other group underwent SMILE at energy levels conventionally used of 115 to 150 nJ (C-SMILE).
Conditions
- Myopia
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
SMILE procedure using lower energy (100, 105, and 110 nJ)
Based on the review of literature, we regarded SMILE using energy levels of 115 nJ or higher as 'conventional' energy-SMILE (C-SMILE). Since 500kHz VisuMax femtosecond laser used in this study had a threshold photodisruption energy level of 100 nJ, lowest energy level of L-SMILE was set at 100 nJ. Because the spot distance must be changed by approximately 1 μm when laser energy changed by 50 nJ, we could set the maximum laser energy to 150 (100 + 50) nJ as highest one of C-SMILE while keeping the spot distance constant. Finally, we established two groups divided by different laser energies: L-SMILE group using lower energy levels of 100, 105, and 110 nJ, and C-SMILE group using 'conventional', not higher, energy levels of 115 to 150 nJ.
- PROCEDURE
-
SMILE procedure using conventional energy (115 to 150 nJ)
The SMILE procedures were conducted in the Eyereum Eye Clinic (Seoul, South Korea). The target postoperative refraction was emmetropia. The surgery, using standardized techniques, was performed by an experienced surgeon (D.S.Y.K.) using the VisuMax system. The surgical parameters used during SMILE were as follows: repetition rate of 500 kHz, pulse energy 100 to 150 nJ (100, 105, and 110 nJ, L-SMILE; 115 to 150 nJ, C-SMILE), spot distance 4.5 μm (regardless of FSL energy), cap thickness 120 μm, and side-cut width 2 mm in the 12-o'clock position with an angle of 90°. After the anterior (upper) and posterior (lower) delineated plane of the intrastromal lenticule were well defined, the anterior and posterior interface were dissected with a micro-spatula with a blunt circular tip and extracted with micro-forceps. The integrity of the lenticule was also checked subsequently.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Yonsei University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-11-16
- Primary Completion
- 2017-01-15
- Completion
- 2017-01-15
Countries
- South Korea
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Corneal Irregular Astigmatism and Visual Quality Following Bilateral Sequential Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and Laser Subepithelial Keratomileusis (LASEK): A Six-Year Comparative Study
NCT06673992 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of Different Lenticule Diameters in Myopic Astigmatism Correction With SMILE Procedures
NCT06062004 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Intralase and Visumax Femtosecond Laser for Laser In Situ Keratomileusis
NCT01252654 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Efficacy and Safety of CLEAR in Myopia and Astigmatism in Chinese Population
NCT05229133 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Wavefront-guided LASIK for Correction of Myopia
NCT01682434 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating the Effect of Optical Zones on Correction for SMILE: Vector Analysis
NCT05017376 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Visumax Femtolasik Versus Moria M2 Microkeratome in Myopia
NCT03193411 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Use of the VisuMax Femtosecond Laser Lenticule Removal Procedure for the Correction of Hyperopia
NCT03431571 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Visual Outcomes After Myopic LASIK
NCT00366743 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Wavefront-guided Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) Versus Wavefront-guided Lasik for Myopia
NCT01140594 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intrastromal Correction of Ametropia by a Femtosecond Laser
NCT00928122 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Safety and Efficacy of a New Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Treatment
NCT04698174 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Refractive Transepithelial Photo-keratectomy (T-PKR) in High Myopia
NCT04917562 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Topo-guided LASIK and Photorefractive Keratectomy vs Wavefront LASIK and Photorefractive Keratectomy
NCT03075176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Axial Length on Visual Quality Following SMILE Surgery in Patients with High Myopia
NCT06898164 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
the Correlation Between Visual Quality After SMILE and LASEK in Patients With Moderate to Low Myopia
NCT07260786 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Efficiency, Predictability and Security of the Trans-epithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy
NCT02893592 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Comparison of Fellow Eyes Undergoing LASIK or PRK With a Wavefront-guided Excimer Laser Versus a Wavefront-optimized Excimer Laser
NCT01135719 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness and Safety of the TENEO 317 Model 2 Excimer Laser to Treat Myopia With or Without Astigmatism by Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy
NCT06618547 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Conventional Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) in U.S. Army Personnel, Substudy of: Initial Evaluation of Excimer Laser Keratorefractive Surgery in U.S. Army Personnel
NCT00412568 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Initial Evaluation of Photorefractive Keratectomy in U.S. Army Personnel
NCT00413673 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinical Effectiveness of SMILE Versus SMILE Xtra in Myopia
NCT06992011 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
KLEx Versus FS-LASIK for the Treatment of Myopia and Compound Myopic Astigmatism
NCT06477081 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Use of the VisuMax™ Femtosecond Laser
NCT01638390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
A Prospective, Contralateral, Eye to Eye Comparison of SMILE Surgery to LASIK Surgery
NCT03067077 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA