Comparison: Constant-rate Infusion Plus Demanding Dosing VS Variable-rate Feedback Infusion Plus Demanding Dosing

NCT03102333 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 78

Last updated 2018-07-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In the case of the newlys developed PCA, the infusion rate is increased according to the patient's need for bolus button, so that the pain can be controlled more efficiently.

Conditions

  • Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

DEVICE

Variable-rate Feedback Infusion mode

The PCA regimen consisted of fentanyl 20 μg/kg and Ramosetron Hcl 0.3 mg (total volume including saline: 100 ml) and was programmed to deliver 1 ml /h as a background infusion and a bolus of 1.5 ml on-demand, with a 15 min lockout time. It can increment or decrement rate(0.2ml/hr) by press bolus button during a 48 h period

DEVICE

Constant-rate Infusion mode

The PCA regimen consisted of fentanyl 20 μg/kg and Ramosetron Hcl 0.3 mg (total volume including saline: 100 ml) and was programmed to deliver 1 ml /h as a background infusion and a bolus of 1.5 ml on-demand, with a 15 min lockout time during a 48 h period

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-12-30
Primary Completion
2017-12-29
Completion
2017-12-29

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03102333 on ClinicalTrials.gov