Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Role of Trans-spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) in Treating Patients With Hand Spasticity After Stroke (NCT NCT03080454)

NCT ID: NCT03080454

Last Updated: 2021-04-05

Results Overview

Subjects' wrists were passively extended at fast speed by a stepper motor to induce a spastic catch response, and its resistance torque was calculated in Newton meters (Nm). Mean percent change from baseline in the area under the curve for the resistance torque were compared across two timepoints (final session at day 5 and 1 week follow-up) in two conditions (sham vs. anodal Doublestim)

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Target enrollment

26 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

baseline, final session at day 5, 1 week FU

Results posted on

2021-04-05

Participant Flow

All participants received both the anodal and sham trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation (tsDCS + pDCS) conditions, and sequence of stimulation conditions was the same across participants, with sham stimulation preceding active stimulation.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Sham Doublestim, Then Anodal Doublestim
Participants underwent 2-3 baseline evaluations, then received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of sham Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). After a washout period of 1 week, sham FU measures were collected. Participants then received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of anodal Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation), and again underwent follow-up measures 1 week after the anodal intervention. For all participants, the sham condition preceded the anodal Doublestim condition.
Baseline
STARTED
26
Baseline
COMPLETED
24
Baseline
NOT COMPLETED
2
Sham Doublestim (5days)
STARTED
24
Sham Doublestim (5days)
COMPLETED
24
Sham Doublestim (5days)
NOT COMPLETED
0
Sham FU (7days)
STARTED
24
Sham FU (7days)
COMPLETED
24
Sham FU (7days)
NOT COMPLETED
0
Anodal Doublestim (5 Days)
STARTED
24
Anodal Doublestim (5 Days)
COMPLETED
23
Anodal Doublestim (5 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
1
Anodal FU (7 Days)
STARTED
23
Anodal FU (7 Days)
COMPLETED
19
Anodal FU (7 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
4

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Sham Doublestim, Then Anodal Doublestim
Participants underwent 2-3 baseline evaluations, then received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of sham Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). After a washout period of 1 week, sham FU measures were collected. Participants then received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of anodal Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation), and again underwent follow-up measures 1 week after the anodal intervention. For all participants, the sham condition preceded the anodal Doublestim condition.
Baseline
Adverse Event
2
Anodal Doublestim (5 Days)
Adverse Event
1
Anodal FU (7 Days)
Lost to Follow-up
4

Baseline Characteristics

The Role of Trans-spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) in Treating Patients With Hand Spasticity After Stroke

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Sham Doublestim, Then Anodal Doublestim
n=26 Participants
Crossover design study: Participants first received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of sham Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). After a washout period of 1 week, they then received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of anodal Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation).
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants
n=99 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
14 Participants
n=99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
26 participants
n=99 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, final session at day 5, 1 week FU

Population: Three subjects (out of 19) were found to be significant outliers for normality testing, and were consequently removed from analysis.

Subjects' wrists were passively extended at fast speed by a stepper motor to induce a spastic catch response, and its resistance torque was calculated in Newton meters (Nm). Mean percent change from baseline in the area under the curve for the resistance torque were compared across two timepoints (final session at day 5 and 1 week follow-up) in two conditions (sham vs. anodal Doublestim)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Sham Doublestim
n=16 Participants
Participants first received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of sham Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). After a washout period of 1 week, they then received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of anodal Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). For all participants, the sham condition preceded the anodal Doublestim condition.
Anodal Doublestim
n=16 Participants
Participants first received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of sham Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). After a washout period of 1 week, they then received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of anodal Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). For all participants, the sham condition preceded the anodal Doublestim condition.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Area Under the Curve for Objectively Measured Spastic Catch Response of the Wrist Flexors at Fast Speed
Mean percent change at final session (day 5)
13.678 percent change
Standard Error 5.537
-8.783 percent change
Standard Error 4.911
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Area Under the Curve for Objectively Measured Spastic Catch Response of the Wrist Flexors at Fast Speed
Mean percent change at 1 week follow-up (FU)
15.927 percent change
Standard Error 5.537
-16.333 percent change
Standard Error 6.180

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, final session at day 5, 1 week FU

Population: Three subjects (out of 19) were found to be significant outliers for normality testing, and were consequently removed from analysis.

The Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) quantifies muscle spasticity for each joint at slow and fast velocities on a 0-5 point scale. MTS scores at fast velocity were summed across 11 joints of the upper extremity (for a total of 0-55 points), with lower scores indicating improved spasticity. Mean summed MTS scores (out of 55 total points) were compared across two timepoints (final session at day 5 and 1 week FU) in two conditions (sham vs. anodal Doublestim).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Sham Doublestim
n=16 Participants
Participants first received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of sham Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). After a washout period of 1 week, they then received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of anodal Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). For all participants, the sham condition preceded the anodal Doublestim condition.
Anodal Doublestim
n=16 Participants
Participants first received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of sham Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). After a washout period of 1 week, they then received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of anodal Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). For all participants, the sham condition preceded the anodal Doublestim condition.
Mean Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) Score
mean score at final session (day 5)
23.375 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.275
21.625 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.275
Mean Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) Score
mean score at 1 week FU
23.125 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.275
21.975 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.309

Adverse Events

Baseline

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Sham Doublestim (5 Days) + Sham FU (7days)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Anodal Doublestim (5 Days) + Anodal FU (7days)

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Baseline
n=26 participants at risk
Prior to any treatment interventions, participants performed 2-3 clinical and objective measure baseline evaluations.
Sham Doublestim (5 Days) + Sham FU (7days)
n=24 participants at risk
Following baseline evaluations, participants first received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of sham Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). After a washout period of 1 week, they received a sham follow-up (FU) measure 7 days post-sham stimulation. Participants then received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of anodal Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation), followed by an anodal FU measure 7 days post-anodal Doublestim.
Anodal Doublestim (5 Days) + Anodal FU (7days)
n=24 participants at risk
Following baseline evaluations, participants first received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of sham Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). After a washout period of 1 week, they received a sham follow-up (FU) measure 7 days post-sham stimulation. Participants then received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of anodal Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation), followed by an anodal FU measure 7 days post-anodal Doublestim.
Vascular disorders
hypotensive vasovagal event
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • eight weeks for each subject
Safety population included all participants who enrolled in study.
0.00%
0/24 • eight weeks for each subject
Safety population included all participants who enrolled in study.
0.00%
0/24 • eight weeks for each subject
Safety population included all participants who enrolled in study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • eight weeks for each subject
Safety population included all participants who enrolled in study.
0.00%
0/24 • eight weeks for each subject
Safety population included all participants who enrolled in study.
0.00%
0/24 • eight weeks for each subject
Safety population included all participants who enrolled in study.
Nervous system disorders
seizure
0.00%
0/26 • eight weeks for each subject
Safety population included all participants who enrolled in study.
0.00%
0/24 • eight weeks for each subject
Safety population included all participants who enrolled in study.
8.3%
2/24 • Number of events 2 • eight weeks for each subject
Safety population included all participants who enrolled in study.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Baseline
n=26 participants at risk
Prior to any treatment interventions, participants performed 2-3 clinical and objective measure baseline evaluations.
Sham Doublestim (5 Days) + Sham FU (7days)
n=24 participants at risk
Following baseline evaluations, participants first received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of sham Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). After a washout period of 1 week, they received a sham follow-up (FU) measure 7 days post-sham stimulation. Participants then received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of anodal Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation), followed by an anodal FU measure 7 days post-anodal Doublestim.
Anodal Doublestim (5 Days) + Anodal FU (7days)
n=24 participants at risk
Following baseline evaluations, participants first received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of sham Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation). After a washout period of 1 week, they received a sham follow-up (FU) measure 7 days post-sham stimulation. Participants then received 5 daily, consecutive 20 min sessions of anodal Doublestim (trans-spinal direct current stimulation + peripheral direct current stimulation), followed by an anodal FU measure 7 days post-anodal Doublestim.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
persistent skin redness
0.00%
0/26 • eight weeks for each subject
Safety population included all participants who enrolled in study.
0.00%
0/24 • eight weeks for each subject
Safety population included all participants who enrolled in study.
4.2%
1/24 • Number of events 1 • eight weeks for each subject
Safety population included all participants who enrolled in study.

Additional Information

Bruce Volpe

Feinstein Institute for Medical Research at Northwell Health

Phone: 516-562-3384

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place